Guest guest Posted January 21, 2000 Report Share Posted January 21, 2000 Suppose some rich raw foodist funds a splashy study. How much will he have to spend on some money-hungry university food-science department to run a well-designed cross-sectional study involving photographing, weighing, and cataloging all the eatings of 1) long-time raw-foodists; 2) recent " converts " ; (3) fudists from macrobiotics to McDonalds obeesos. Also, periodic med-exams and tailored toxemia immunology studies. <br><br>Said rich raw-foodist, (if Robin Williams is indeed a raw foodist, as a recent magazine said, then ask him to do this), could get good returns by having all the university-overhead portion of the research charges be declared a tax-deductible donation. Or whatever.<br><br>Would that guy ever be hated! But it would sure establish a lot of converts.<br><br>I'd also like to see discussions of raw food restuarants and what it takes to start one (and where?). Which said rich dude could help out, etc.<br><br>Lacking such studies, in a few decades the now-older ones of us will be staying abnormally spry and youngish looking. At 55 I look forward to the next 50 years, now that I'm an agile 140-lb t sprinter again (after 20 years) instead of the fatso 190 I was a year ago, secretly humiliatted at being too clumsy to run. <br><br>What if I don't change much in the next 20 years? I already look ten years younger than I am. <br><br>What if they find out that emmortality therapies only work in the long run with raw food?<br><br>We all would like it to happen overnight, but I guarantee it will take 2 generations. (Next post for how.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.