Guest guest Posted November 30, 2004 Report Share Posted November 30, 2004 This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my) URL: http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2004/11/30/features/9364111 & sec=features ________________________ Tuesday November 30, 2004 Alleged smuggling of monkeys by Thai zoo investigated Where did the 100 orang utans at a private zoo in Bangkok come from? HILARY CHIEW traces the campaign to free the arboreal apes. Intense campaigning by conservation groups has so far failed to pressure the Thai Government to resolve the alleged smuggling of some 100 orang utans by private zoo Safari World in Bangkok. Groups such as the Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation (BOS), its Thai counterpart the Wildlife Friends of Thailand (WFFT) and ProFauna of Indonesia have demanded that the Asian great apes be returned to Indonesia, where they were likely poached from. WFFT director Edwin Wiek said, however, that there has been a glitch in DNA analyses to determine the origins of the apes. Early last month, a government lab failed to identify the genetic code of 50 orang utans, citing insufficient tissue samples. Fresh ones would have to be collected, causing further delay. Trade in orang utans is prohibited under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) and the questionable high ratio of young animals in the zoo-cum-amusement park challenges the owner’s claim that the orang utans were born in captivity. Of the 115 orang utans seen during the initial Forestry Police raid on Safari World early last November, 101 were juveniles and babies. Safari World director Pin Kewkacha insisted that there had been a 20-year breeding programme, and it had registered seven births every year. Scientific analyses of the birthrate, however, shatter that claim. Dr Willie Smits, an orang utan expert at BOS, said it was biologically impossible for 31 babies aged between two and four years to have been conceived by Safari World’s three female adults given the species’ birth intervals of between three and four years. “There is no theoretical way to explain how the 115 orang utans can be there legally,” said Smits, who was enlisted by the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry to assist in the investigation. He also said the orang utans belong to three different subspecies, which suggested that they were likely poached from the wild. Furthermore, those familiar with the zoo scene in Thailand pointed out that there was not a single orang utan in Safari World prior to 1989. The Forestry Police, meanwhile, is frustrated by the evasive response of the National Parks, Wildlife and Plants Conservation Department (DNP). In an unprecedented move, Commander of the Forestry Police, Major General Sawek Pinsinchai, in July filed charges against Safari World for illegal possession as only 46 of the apes have proper documents. The DNP, which should have been the party taking action against Safari World, instead advised against the legal suit. DNP director-general Dr Schwann Tunhikorn even urged Sawek to drop the charges, saying there was “no evidence of any wrongdoings” at the zoo. The DNP has been accused of stalling the DNA analyses as it had raised the difficulties of proving the orang utans’ origins and pointed out the lack of testing facilities. The Indonesian government, however, has dismissed these concerns, noting that DNA reference material was available in Indonesia; thus the animals’ origins could be established with certainty. Although there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that these orang utans were wild caught and illegally imported, the only way to prove their origins is through DNA tests on every individual. If all juveniles were bred at the zoo, a family band between the juveniles and the adults would show up in DNA tests. Hair, blood and saliva samples have been taken for analysis by Katsaert University. The findings would be crucial for further prosecution and the future of the apes. Campaigners have accused the zoo of tampering with what is essentially court evidence. An Indonesian delegation, which was in Thailand in late July to conduct an inventory of the orang utans, found only 69 orang utans in Safari World. They were told that the other animals had died from a pneumonia outbreak and their carcasses had been cremated. The explanation was not acceptable to the delegation comprising government officials as well as Smits and Wiek. BOS has appointed Wiek as their representative to co-ordinate all matters regarding illegally obtained orang utans within Thailand. Wiek was sceptical of the claim as the boxing show had continued in spite of the “pneumonia epidemic” and there was no effort to separate the animals to keep the ailment in check. Two weeks after the Indonesian team left, Sawek was informed about the transportation of some orang utans to Safari World. It turned out that 37 orang utans had joined the 69 apes at the amusement park. The exposure confirmed Wiek’s suspicions that the animals were relocated to avoid the inspection. They were probably sent to a Safari World facility at Koh Kong, an island across the Cambodian border. The team is making an inventory of ape pictures taken at both the Bangkok and Koh Kong zoos to identify the animals based on the dark patches on their bellies and limbs which are unique, like fingerprints. The illegal trade in orang utans in Thailand was first documented by the British-based Monkey World and the Taiwanese Pingtung Rescue Centre following a three-year investigation. Monkey World has since offered £100,000 (RM680,000) to pay for the return of the orang utans to their Indonesian home as soon as the Thai authorities release them. The British and Taiwanese team documented large numbers of orang utans at several zoos and safari parks in Thailand, the worst offender being Safari World. When pressed for a response on this issue, Cites senior enforcement officer John Sellar said: “The Secretariat has recently written to the Cites Management Authority of Thailand to ensure that it is aware of an offer by Indonesia to provide long-term care for the orang utans that we understand have been seized. We have encouraged Thailand to make use of this offer, as soon as the animals have been formally confiscated.” The Cites secretariat monitors and advises its member nations on trade in endangered species. Meanwhile, the animals remain in the zoo in squalid conditions and until days before a Cites conference in Bangkok in October, continued to be featured in boxing shows and used as photo-prop by tourists, antics that non-government organisations said demean the creatures and alter their natural behaviour. “The cages that some of the orang utans are kept in are so small that they cannot even stand up and many need urgent medical care,” observed Smits in his report to the Indonesian government. He noted not only skin diseases on the orang utans but also herpes, and three had serious neurological disturbances. Up to 10 of them could be suffering from Hepatitis B or C. More animals are at risk as poor husbandry in the zoo encouraged the spread of contagious diseases.<p> ________________________ Your one-stop information portal: The Star Online http://thestar.com.my http://biz.thestar.com.my http://classifieds.thestar.com.my http://cards.thestar.com.my http://search.thestar.com.my http://star-motoring.com http://star-space.com http://star-jobs.com http://star-ecentral.com http://star-techcentral.com 1995-2004 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Star Publications is prohibited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.