Guest guest Posted October 4, 2005 Report Share Posted October 4, 2005 http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/oct32005/state195032005102.asp Tiger trail: Cloning not an alternative DH News Service Bangalore: Taking a dig at the Centre for investing Rs 3 crore in trying to clone the cheetah, Dr Karanth asked, ‘Where will the cloned cheetahs live?’ Cloning is the buzzword in today’s world and tigers are the most spoken about animals in India today because of the rapidly depleting numbers. So why can’t we clone a tiger to save them from extinction? According to Dr Ullas Karanth, noted tiger biologist, cloning is not the solution to save the tiger. “Cloning is irrelevant because tigers normally breed in large numbers. What we are concerned about is protecting wildlife by conserving habitats for them to live and not by increasing their numbers,” he said. Instead of initiating steps to protect them, we are talking about bringing up tigers in well-equipped labs, he said, criticising the idea. When questioned whether cloning would help in conserving tigers, he said the tigers cannot be sold like cows. The numbers may be there but wildlife has a premium, which is why poachers are interested in them, he felt and added that such captive breeding had not helped in conservation wherever such an experiment was done. Conserve habitats In the interactive session that followed the screening of the film ‘Tigers Fighting Back’, Dr Karanth took a dig at the Central government for investing Rs 3 crore in trying to clone the cheetah which disappeared from India almost 50 years ago. “Even if they are cloned where will they live?” he asked, stating that the cheetah habitat had been wiped out completely. The enthusiasm of the audience in conserving wildlife was encouraging given the number of queries that Dr Karanth received on the public’s role in protecting wildlife and environment. Dr Karanth said, “One should love watching animals. That’s what will drive you. Else one may buckle under the pressure of being a conservationist.” “There are immense opportunities if one is willing to set aside time for conservation,” he added. Co-existence the key As to whether humans and wildlife could co-exist, he explained that there were a few sub-sects which cannot co-exist with human beings. Excluding these sub-sects, humans can and have to co-exist with wildlife, he added. As for radio-collaring of animals and its effect, he said the effect would depend on the size of the animal and the size of the tags used. Today, radio collaring is a very professional thing and thanks to miniaturisation of technology, concerns about radio collaring is limited to very small animals, he added. The film was screened as part of Wildlife Week celebrations by Wildlife Conservation Society - India, in association with Wildlife First and Centre for Wildlife Studies. It shows work of 3 tiger biologists who followed the trail of the tiger through the tropical jungles of India, the rainforests of Thailand and the cold barrens of Siberia. Demythifying the buzz surrounding the eco- tourism, Dr Ullas Karant warned that eco-tourism could have a negative impact, if it was not done in the right way. “There are cases in which eco-tourism has expanded the landbase for wildlife. But a legitimate case has to be made,” he said, regretting that India has not done a good job when it comes to eco-tourism. Rightly put, the revenue from eco-tourism should go towards conservation of wildlife and to locals who assist in these activities, for their benefit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.