Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 LIVE EXPORT END INEVITABLE: RSPCA By REBECCA RAWLINGS THE RSPCA has claimed farmers need to accept the inevitable end of the live export trade. In a brave address at the WA Farmers Federation (WAFF) annual conference pastoral dinner last week, RSPCA president Lynn Bradshaw told producers that her organisation's view was that the live export of animals for slaughter is cruel, costs Australians jobs, and is unnecessary. " The RSPCA has long maintained that livestock should be slaughtered as close as possible to the point of production, because of the suffering associated with their transport, " Ms Bradshaw said. Ms Bradshaw said exported livestock could be humanely slaughtered in Australian abattoirs, which would create jobs and build more resilient economies in rural and regional communities. She said that research, and international experience, such as the banning of live export of lambs in New Zealand, had shown banning the trade did not need to adversely affect farmers. Ms Bradshaw warned farmers not to buy into the myth that markets in South East Asia and the Middle East demand only live animals for religious or cultural purposes. She said Australia already exports chilled and frozen meat to every significant market for live exports, and this means Australian meat is competing with Australian live exports in the same overseas markets. " It was Gandhi who said, 'The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated,' " Ms Bradshaw said. " The continuation of the live export trade is a sad reflection on our country, and is hardly representative of the wishes of the vast majority of Australians. " Producer groups and farmer's federations must come to realize that 85pc of the community supports the RSPCA, and it is the Australian community which must be satisfied over animal welfare issues. " The RSPCA's policy is that live stock exports should be banned and replaced with a carcass trade. Ms Bradshaw said the RSPCA would continue to lobby the end of the trade, and whilst they would welcome any improvements in current animal welfare regulations, RSPCA's position on live exports would not change. " We encourage the farming community to recognise what we see as an inevitable end to the trade, and to start working toward an orderly transition to carcass only export before community pressure becomes overwhelming, " Ms Bradshaw said. WAFarmers pastoral president Helen Newland said the RSPCA was very closed-minded about live export, and although Ms Bradshaw had agreed to discuss live export at the WAFarmers pastoral conference she clearly demonstrated the RSPCA would never support the trade. Ms Newland said if the RSPCA was successful in banning live export a lot of people would be out of work, and essentially this could put the top end of Australia out of business. Ms Newland said there was not a big enough market for boxed beef to replace live exports from Australia. If it was that simple then producers would prefer to process animals in Australia. However this was not a reality. " If Australia stops live export then other countries will take over, " Ms Newland said. Ms Newland said the RSPCA was naive to think live exports could be replaced with a carcass only trade without having adverse effects on WA's farming community. " The RSPCA is living in la-la land, " she said. " The markets for boxed beef are not there; even if live export was banned there is not the killing space in WA abattoirs to process the livestock numbers that would result from stopping the trade. " Banning live export would definitely have an adverse effect on rural Australia. " Ms Newland said it was important industry kept trying to improve animal welfare standards in the live export trade. " Action speaks louder than words, " she said. " Hopefully people will see that a less than 1pc mortality rate on live export ships is a high standard of animal welfare, especially when the mortality rate of sheep on farms is 3pc. " Ms Newland said that education of the general public was needed to ensure the future of live export. She said she would be interested know where Ms Bradshaw's figures were from that stated 85pc of the WA community supported the ban of live export from Australia. She thought more than likely the results were from a city-based survey where people had no understanding of live export. " Live export needs to be reported accurately, fairly and truthfully, " Ms Newman said. " I think the RSPCA has lost their direction. " Ms Bradshaw said that banning live export would create an extra 9000 jobs in the processing industry, but this is not the RSPCA's agenda, their main concern is animal welfare. " Ms Bradshaw said the RSPCA doesn't like being aligned with PETA, however their actions are just as radical. " http://fw.farmonline.com.au/news.asp?editorial_id=62057 & class_id=2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.