Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

FWD: Species threatened with extinction

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

This message was forwarded to you by yitzeling.

 

Comment from sender:

 

 

This article is from The Star Online

URL:

http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2004/12/28/features/9507980 & sec=\

features

 

________________________

 

Tuesday December 28, 2004

Species threatened with extinction

By HILARY CHIEW

 

THE world’s biological diversity continues to decline, with the latest World

Conservation Union’s (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species revealing that 15,589

species face extinction in the near future.

 

Released at the 3rd IUCN World Conservation Congress in Bangkok last month, the

authoritative list is an update of the last major analysis in 2000, which showed

that one in eight birds (12%) and one in four mammals (23%) were threatened with

extinction.

 

The new report titled A Global Species Assessment showed that the pressure on

birds and mammals has not eased and the infamous line-up has now been joined by

one in three amphibians (32%) and almost half (42%) of turtles and tortoises.

 

Craig Hilton-Taylor, IUCN’s Red List programme officer, said the number of

threatened species highlighted in the report was an under-estimate since only a

fraction of known species had been assessed. “There is still much to be

discovered about key species-rich habitats such as tropical forests and marine

and freshwater systems, as well as invertebrates, plants and fungi which make up

the majority of biodiversity.”

 

The latest list covered 38,047 species, less than 3% of the world’s 1.9 million

described species. The conservation status of 26,220 animals and 11,824 plants

was studied. In comparison, the previous list assessed 16,507 species and found

11,406 in a threatened state.

 

The 191-page report included for the first time, complete assessments of

amphibians, cycads and conifers. It also highlighted which species were at

greatest risk of extinction, where they occurred, and the many threats facing

them as well as successful rescue of species from the brink of extinction.

 

In the vertebrate groups, amphibians are the most threatened. The report

pointed out that while the status of vertebrates was relatively well documented

(roughly 40% has been assessed), scientists know very little about species in

non-terrestrial systems (such as freshwater and marine), species-rich habitats

(tropical forests and the deep ocean) and or species-rich groups (invertebrates,

plants and fungi).

 

 

 

Conceived in 1963, the Red List is produced by the IUCN Species Survival

Commission (SSC) – a network of some 8,000 scientists in 120 specialist groups

working in almost every country – and possibly holds the most complete

scientific knowledge on the biology and current conservation status of species.

 

Not withstanding all the scientific efforts, conservationists are at their

wits’ end on how to make the rest of the world take their foreboding findings

seriously.

 

IUCN director-general Achim Steiner admitted that despite years of producing

scientific data highlighting the impending crisis, the conservation community

still faced difficulties in making people believe them and understand the

significance of their finds. “This is not just the passion of some individual

scientists to shock people into believing the consequences of the loss. These

findings are being ignored. We’re reaching the limit of exploitation and we must

reverse the fate,” he said, adding that the loss of one species would have a

domino effect on entire ecosystems.

 

The report said the current rate of species loss, dubbed the sixth wave of

extinction, was 50 to 500 times higher than those in fossil records. These

records appear to be punctuated by five major mass extinctions, the most recent

of which occurred 65 million years ago.

 

And while the vast majority of extinctions documented since 1500 had occurred

on oceanic islands, the report warned that continental extinctions were becoming

common with 27 species suffering that fate in the past 20 years.

 

The total number of extinctions listed by IUCN has grown from 766 in 2000 to

784 this year while the number of “extinct in the wild” species (found only in

captivitivity) rose from 50 to 60. Extinct in the wild species are in many

respect, extinct, as they no longer play a functional role in their ecosystems.

And because successful reintroductions are rare, it cannot be assumed that these

species will be restored to the wild.

 

Steiner, however, remained hopeful as two-thirds of the world’s governments are

members of IUCN. He believed the much-needed political will for policy

development could be garnered to speed up inter-governmental co-operation to

halt biodiversity loss.

 

“Most threats to biodiversity are human-driven but human action alone can

prevent many species from becoming extinct. There are many examples of species

being brought back from the brink, such as the southern white rhino and black-

footed ferret, and thousands of dedicated people around the world are doing

their utmost to reverse the extinction rate. “But this cannot continue to be the

task of the environmental community alone. Governments and businesses must

commit to these efforts as well,” he added.

 

The European Commission’s 25 member countries responded by initiating Countdown

2010 – Halt the loss of biodiversity in May. The target year of 2010 is in

accordance with the goal set at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in

Johannesburg in 2002 to reduce the rate of species loss.

 

In this initiative, European governments will co-ordinate their commitments to

a series of global and regional agreements aimed at protecting biodiversity such

as the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Millennium Development Goals.

 

World Wide Fund for Nature International director-general Claude Martin,

however, commented that governments are not good at making commitments and worse

at keeping their words.

 

“Politicians are more likely to listen when there’s a strong public opinion, so

we need to co-ordinate these voices. And Europe must take note of its ecological

footprints outside the continent,” he said in reference to European subsidies in

the fisheries sector that is fuelling destructive fishing practices in waters

beyond Europe.

 

Indeed, the 2010 goal hinges on the sincerity of developed countries to remove

such perverse incentives and channel the financial resources to developing

countries, which hold the most threatened species but are least able to invest

resources into conservation.

 

<p>

 

________________________

Your one-stop information portal:

The Star Online

http://thestar.com.my

http://biz.thestar.com.my

http://classifieds.thestar.com.my

http://cards.thestar.com.my

http://search.thestar.com.my

http://star-motoring.com

http://star-space.com

http://star-jobs.com

http://star-ecentral.com

http://star-techcentral.com

 

1995-2004 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written

permission of Star Publications is prohibited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...