Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

FWD: Timber certification rejected

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

***************************Advertisement***************************

TechCentral

http://star-techcentral.com

 

*****************************************************************

This message was forwarded to you by yitzeling.

 

Comment from sender:

 

 

This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my)

URL:

http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2004/2/20/features/7357470 & sec=f\

eatures

 

________________________

 

Friday February 20, 2004

Timber certification rejected

By TAN CHENG LI

 

OVER 250 indigenous communities have signed a petition rejecting the timber

certification scheme designed by the Malaysian Timber Certification Council

(MTCC).

 

These communities were unaware of the certification scheme and did not support

it as it did not take indigenous rights into account, Adrian Lasimbang,

secretary-general of the Indigenous People's Network of Malaysia, told a press

conference on the sidelines of the global biodiversity meet in Kuala Lumpur.

 

Over the past two months, 59 orang asli villages in Peninsular Malaysia, 80

native villages in Sabah and 114 longhouse communities in Sarawak have signed

the petition.

 

Lasimbang said indigenous groups pulled out from talks on the MTCC scheme in

2001 as their views were ignored. “We felt our presence there was just to

endorse the scheme.”

 

The MTCC was set up in 1998 to develop a certification scheme to ensure that

Malaysian timber originated from sustainably-managed forests. Under

globally-agreed criteria, timber certification schemes must address the concerns

of stakeholders such as environment societies, social groups and local

communities.

 

In the MTCC scheme, however, Lasimbang said the indigenous community was

represented by the Department of Orang Asli Affairs, Sarawak Dayak National

Union, Sarawak Council for Tradition, Sabah Indigenous Iranun Association, Sabah

Tidung Association and the Sabah Kedayan Association.

 

“While these organisations may be indigenous-based, we feel that they do not

represent the indigenous communities that are facing the direct impact of

logging in their forest homelands. Some of these communities are coastal

dwellers, not forest dwellers,” said Lasimbang.

 

He said the MTCC failed to recognise and protect indigenous rights over

traditional lands. Citing an example, he said their rights over the land would

be extinguished should the site be declared as a forest management unit (FMU)

for logging. Currently, there are 10 FMUs in Sabah, each about 100,000ha.

 

“If the MTCC is genuinely concerned about guaranteeing the social and cultural

sustainability of indigenous communities, it should halt all logging in

traditional lands until at least the highest standards of timber certification

are in place,” said Lasimbang, who is also a resource person with the

Sabah-based Partners of Communities Organisation (Pacos).

 

He said an acceptable certification scheme should comply with these conditions:

recognition of their rights to traditional land, compliance with the criteria of

the globally-accepted Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification scheme,

participation of credible indigenous people as assessors, and consent from local

communities before logging was allowed in their ancestral land.

 

MTCC in a press statement, insisted that non-governmental organisations (NGOs)

and local communities had participated in the certification scheme, with

involvement from 58 groups representing various stakeholders in the first

national consultation in 1999. It said a number of social and environment groups

withdrew from the consultations in 2001 as they were dissatisfied with MTCC's

response to their demands. MTCC said some of these demands were beyond its

jurisdiction, while others could be included in the certification standard only

after negotiations with other stakeholders.

 

It said a national-level meeting held in October 2001 saw the participation of

71 organisations, including 22 environment and social NGOs.

 

Earlier this week, Greenpeace International had urged governments in Europe to

support an international system for timber certification, claiming that the MTCC

scheme was questionable and had little or no involvement of indigenous people.

 

<p>

 

________________________

Your one-stop information portal:

The Star Online

http://thestar.com.my

http://biz.thestar.com.my

http://classifieds.thestar.com.my

http://cards.thestar.com.my

http://search.thestar.com.my

http://star-motoring.com

http://star-space.com

http://star-jobs.com

http://star-ecentral.com

http://star-techcentral.com

 

1995-2003 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written

permission of Star Publications is prohibited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...