Guest guest Posted July 25, 2003 Report Share Posted July 25, 2003 South China Morning Post http://hongkong.scmp.com/hknews/ZZZSMOL5DID.html Friday, July 25, 2003 by ANNA HEALY FENTON Worried pet owners have come out of the woodwork since the recent announcement that only fish and birds will be allowed in public housing. The number of animals affected by the new hygiene points system is now becoming clearer. One indicator is the 100-plus phone calls received each day by the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). A typical caller, according to SPCA spokeswoman Doris Yiu Wai-fun, is the single mother bringing up two difficult sons. Since the family got their two cats, the boys' behaviour has improved, and says Ms Yiu, " now she's scared if the cats go, she will no longer be able to manage her sons. " Pet ownership has always been disallowed at Hong Kong's housing estates, though enforcement was lax until Team Clean - the government's post-Sars task force on hygiene - announced its points system. Under the system, pet ownership is one of the sins for which tenants will be assigned points, and those who accumulate too may points will be evicted. Until now, the Housing Department has claimed not to know how many animals will be evicted as a result of the system. " The pets are usually hidden so we have no way of counting them,'' a department spokeswoman says. Last year, 257 pet owners were warned and one evicted. In the first six months of this year, there were 447 warnings and seven notices to quit. From April to June there have been 174 warnings, with no evictions. Estate management staff, " have been keeping an eye out for pets recently,'' she adds. The Housing Department has not been able to muster much sympathy for the pets and pet owners put in jeopardy by the new policies. A department spokeswoman suggests hopefully that people could give the animals away to friends and added that some help might be given but could not detail what form the aid will take. " Well, it's their responsibility anyway, they signed the lease. Before the implementation of the marking scheme they must make arrangements, " she says. Based on a survey finding that 28 per cent of Hong Kong people keep pets, Ms Yiu says, there could be as many as 200,000 households in the city's public housing system that keep animals - with many keeping more than one. The Housing Department's stance on the owners' responsibility to dispose of the pets has shifted the burden to other government departments - such as the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation - and to private agencies such as SPCA. Many of these agencies, already bursting at the seams with unwanted pets, are calling for a re-evaluation of the points system and of community attitudes toward animals in general. " A compassionate society should be developed in Hong Kong,'' says Doctor John Wedderburn of the Asian Animal Protection Network, one of the 12 animal welfare organisations that took part in a protest of the points system last Friday. " The right for life starts with animals.'' Lee Cert-quinn, chief housing manager [support services] in the Housing Department, agrees that people's right to keep animals and the rights of animals should be respected. He adds, however, that congestion is the real reason for the new rules. There are still 10,000 public housing tenants living in less than 5.5 square metres each, he says, when the target is seven metres. " There simply isn't enough space for pets too.'' The newest public units measure 422 square feet for four to five people. For hygiene and nuisance reasons, pet keeping is not feasible, he adds. " We have a Chinese saying: when one dog barks at a shadow, 100,000 dogs bark.'' But SPCA deputy executive director Pauline Taylor dismisses this argument. As long as the dogs are trained, sterilised, exercised and properly licensed and registered, they should be allowed to live in public housing, she says. " Even in the smallest flats.'' Of course no one should have to live next door to 10 Rottweilers, she adds. " In Singapore, it's one toy dog of an approved breed. " There is no reason why a similar approach could not work in Hong Kong, Ms Taylor says. " I appreciate the housing is different there but the fundamentals are the same.'' She calls for proper animal regulations in Hong Kong. The existing rules date back to the 1960s when villagers were first housed in public blocks and brought all their animals with them. She recalls a photo of fire services winching a cow out of a Mongkok public block. " All the rules need updating.'' But Mr Lee won't budge. " We are the housing department and our job is to provide affordable housing. It is the responsibility of other government departments to look after the welfare of animals, " he says. " We have to ensure we provide a safe, clean environment. " The irony of it all, says Ms Taylor, is that Hong Kong's crackdown comes just as Beijing is looking at relaxing its Draconian dog laws. anna.healyfenton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.