Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

hunting vote on monday and the good doctors moral maze?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Do you mean it is " our law " in that you speak as a member of the

establishment or " our law " in that it has been wholly imposed on us

without any scope for question it?

 

 

[ is it the hunting vote at the UK Houses of Parliament tomorrow Monday?

must be a demo down there ... details anyone? ]

 

 

Barry Horne was found guilt of arson to suit the interest of the

Establishment who wanted to make an example of him.

 

yet clearly he was not an arsonist.

 

Mens Rea versus Mens Acteus in legal terms. His intent was never just arson,

he was on a moral crusade. but the Establishment would never accept anything

like that.

 

Privileged and educated people, those with the power of forming and

confirming ideas put about a vision of the legal and moral framework of our

society as a level playfield; two parties sitting at a table on equal terms.

 

it is as far from that as possible.

 

a far better image would be on one huge personal throttling a child on the

floor while beating the hell of out him. if the child lifts one finger to

try and stop that abuse, the bully cries for the justification of his attack

and intensifies it. in this case, the child being the moral activist and the

bully being the Establishment.

 

this has been the policy of the Establishment as it has evolved to its

position of total authority through violence of one form or other from at

least Ancient Greece. note the way the Athenians kept the Theban slave caste

down by sending their young men in amongst them in disguise, finding anyone

with leadership potential and killing them. cut off the head and the beast

dies.

 

of course a few less folk die these days but instead a corrupted and self

interested law is used as violence against moral dissenting individuals,

especially if they are right about the changes they tried reasonably for a

long time to make. the law has been so hugely corrupted in favour of the

property owners [ which we can prove to be the property thieves ] and

against the moral activists. in fact, the law has practically nothing to do

with morals and righteous

 

so your pejorative use of the term " firebomber " regarding Hornes activism

was confirming the establishments prejudices and you were using your

position of privilege as an educated opinion former to do what? I did not

know if it was just second nature, or if you were confirm your privileges

within the Establishment by voicing the opinion of the Establishment or

using it to establish a moral high ground for yourself.

 

So would our cause benefit more from a Royal Commission or the personal

sacrifice of a few folk making a direct action. Given that our Monarchy is

rather keen on hunting and the Establishment rather keen on its roast beef,

I think that is a closed argument. And we will see what they make of even

fox hunting in the next few days.

 

My bet goes on a complete unsatisfactory fudge but I look forward to being

pleasantly - or peasantly - surprised.

 

Tony Bank, our wonderful veggie MP said some great things against the

current " Third Way " stand. He said there were no compromises and in a case

like this there was only a winner and loser. we'll see.

 

so it was not a personal attack so much as a wish to make you confront

perhaps unconscious motivations that corrupt your thinking. this is a

similar set of conditions to that of the September 11th debate.

 

one can buy in, recycle and promulgate what the Establishment wants you to

recycle and confirm in the minds of those less privileged and able or you

that it is right. or you can stop and ask who is more in the wrong and

defend the well meant actions, however misdirected they might be, of those

that question and oppose the current regime we live under.

 

at the end of the day, I know where hope and positive change lies and I know

what we are up against. History has sadly proven it never comes about

without the personal sacrifice of those that throw themselves onto the guns

and against the ramparts.

 

it used to be that the Establishments used to use the peasants to thrown

them onto the guns and against the ramparts other Establishments. Now that

the Establishment is practically one and global what we have seen in the

evolution of peasants taking action for themselves first through the social

justice and women's movements, now through the environmental and animal

rights movements - with an aside to development issues in the exploited

nations. the struggle continuing in all those spheres. I am just so amazed

by, so revere people that will sacrifice their lives for not even another

human but just dumb animals or plants.

 

so where does the moral right lie?*

 

whose side are you on?

 

if you take the " we've got to play by Daddy's rules now children "

approach, you are screwed. because Daddy's rules don¹t included us winning.

and Daddy does not get beaten. look as Israel so see how rough Daddy plays.

 

changes requires action and I would accept at one end of the scale direct

action without blame and at the other the practice of spiritual path as such

as Gandhi largely followed. we are still up against guns and ramparts of

the same people he faced up but the guns have become a hell of a lot bigger

and the ramparts much higher.

 

 

 

John

 

* pretty good play on words, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...