Guest guest Posted October 11, 2001 Report Share Posted October 11, 2001 I was just having this conversation with myself -- not really, a friend -- today. I have thought about the ramifications of leather v. man-made and I've always decided that a leather-free existence makes much more sense to me. My brain hurts...long day...so, I won't expound. Just lending my support. xxk@xx ashley.hooper [ashley.hooper]On Behalf Of Ashley Hooper 11 October 2001 14:25 vegan-network [100% veg*n ] Environmental concern/veganism Which is worse - use of a byproduct of the meat industry, i.e. leather - direct consequences to an already-dead animal: negligible OR pollution and destruction of the environments and habitats of animals - indirect consequences to wild, living animals: often death, possibly extinction? but ....having said that leather as a byproduct subsidises the price of meat and killing animals. Our wearing of leather may legitimise use of animals as a resource to non-vegans. This is one of those 'grey areas' and each vegan's decision to be made for themselves. For me the strongest argument is I like to think we can show others that it's entirely possible to lead a normal life without the use of animal products, to be prototypes, perhaps, for the 'next generation' of humanity . Ash _________________________ Visit http://www.visto.com. Find out how companies are linking mobile users to the enterprise with Visto. To to the Digest Mode [ recommended ], send an email to: vegan-network-digest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.