Digest Number 2447

[Guest guest]

Bob -

 

I am 100% agreement with you about how we substantiate claims. The sharing

of clinical stories is a very different process than research and yet, both

must be driven by critical thinking processes.

 

Will

 

Will,

 

I think your chemical comparison is compelling, and I will have to

take that into account. This is not my strong suit, but it is

definitely germane to the discussion. However, it was the statements

you made based on clinical experience that I wanted clarification of.

It seems to me that how we substantiate claims of function and

efficacy is extremely important. I believe we have been too naive and

trusting, not to say gullible, for too long.

 

Bob