Guest guest Posted July 31, 2002 Report Share Posted July 31, 2002 Jim and all, Tardy reply. > For those less self-motivated or less able to learn Chinese (an [ . . .] > considering the limited time avaiable. >From the perspective of a merchant, I would look at the problem from the outside-in, rather than from the inside-out. I think we need to make peace with the fact that we are preparing people to earn their living in a medical delivery system that is so deeply rooted in our economies that our future as a profession, perhaps even our survival as a profession, depends on having both a sufficient and positive medical and economic impact. If we cannot prepare the " average college graduate " to leave our schools equipped to provide a known population with enough cost-justified therapy to pay their student loans, buy an " average " house, and send their 2.25 average kids to college, we will not become a self-governing profession because we will lack the resources necessary to govern access to and delivery of CM. Thus, while I agree that this takes more than just Chinese language, I think that the answer to what more it takes lays in listening to the peoples to whom we offer our services and preparing our graduates to meet their needs. To me this means a greater concentration on who our patient's are and what they want both in terms of the practice development issues Honora Wolf has addressed but also in designing curriculum to provide the necessary therapeutic foundation and experience. Although I don't think that schooling must be only " job training " and I certainly feel that were graduates provided a solid knowledge of Chinese cultural topics they would have a clearer understanding of their skills and how to use them, we also need to know what the surrounding culture wants from us and to teach graduates to efficiently provide it. We could accomplish this except that we continue to view CM as an " alternative " to biomedicine, rather than as a service we are offering our patients justified by its own results. Consider, for example, the response to the PRC's integrated medicine. Because we have allowed the discussion of integrated medicine to be dominated by issues of " purity " - a notion that depends on seeing CM as an alternative to biomedicine - we have failed to note that it is the PRC's road map for the participation of CM physicians in a biomedically-dominated medico-economic system. Their system is not ours, and we will not do what they do, but we can certainly look at it as an idea of how to work within our own medical economies. > If publishers got a better ROI because more texts were used in > classes and reading and research skills were developed earlier, they could > include the Chinese characters in each translation and in that way help > develop an intellectual environment where the Chinese characters > themselves would be more immediate, accessible, and influential. I don't think that the problem is publisher's return on investment. If you look at the cost of pre-production, production and distribution of texts commonly used in the CM schools, the percentage return is likely higher than that for biomedical texts because the pre-production costs are so much lower. The relative profit numbers are smaller because the market is smaller not because the return is deficient. We would not be seeing the largest publishers in the world jumping-in if a bunch of MBA's didn't think there was a useful return. I think the problem is that the field generally does not believe that the explicit relationship of Chinese to English is important, otherwise we would not have lecture materials or textbooks that are neither fully documented or glossed. All anyone would need to say is that to be acceptable as a CM textbook a work must meet generally accepted peer review standards and publishers would see investment in the textbook market in an entirely different light because the limits to competition would be resolved. Bob bob Paradigm Publications www.paradigm-pubs.com 44 Linden Street Robert L. Felt Brookline MA 02445 617-738-4664 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.