Guest guest Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Chinese Medicine , Yangchu Higgins <ycmgh wrote: > " In many circles the search for " orgins " is considered a blind alley... Medicine like language changes constantly, taking on a life of its own, relevant to the particularities of its context. " Yet it is the future which may be more intriguing for adherents of any traditional medicine, in the face of allopathy's current dominance, and the fact that we humans literally and figuratively cross-fertilize with each other. In 200 years - assuming we continue to migrate, integrate and comunicate at blistering speeds - how do we imagine our medical models will be? What will they be called? Who will practice them? Will being custodians of 'origins' and the 'past' help to maintain the coherence of CM - and other traditional healing systems - or will the sweet young things of the future become ever more dismissive of the past, and ancient histories? Margi Macdonald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 Hi Margi: Can't see how being dismissive of the past can lead to good things. Standing on the shoulders of giants... Without knowing our origins we will become watered down. If the past isn't important, then only the now and the future are, and we end up enmeshed, once again, in our modern myth of 'progress'. Hugo ________________________________ Hugo Ramiro http://middlemedicine.wordpress.com http://www.middlemedicine.org ________________________________ margi.macdonald <margi.macdonald Chinese Medicine Thursday, 17 September, 2009 8:45:20 Re: Ayurveda-- & medicines of the future Traditional_ Chinese_Medicine , Yangchu Higgins <ycmgh wrote: > " In many circles the search for " orgins " is considered a blind alley... Medicine like language changes constantly, taking on a life of its own, relevant to the particularities of its context. " Yet it is the future which may be more intriguing for adherents of any traditional medicine, in the face of allopathy's current dominance, and the fact that we humans literally and figuratively cross-fertilize with each other. In 200 years - assuming we continue to migrate, integrate and comunicate at blistering speeds - how do we imagine our medical models will be? What will they be called? Who will practice them? Will being custodians of 'origins' and the 'past' help to maintain the coherence of CM - and other traditional healing systems - or will the sweet young things of the future become ever more dismissive of the past, and ancient histories? Margi Macdonald Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2009 Report Share Posted September 18, 2009 Well said, Hugo! ________________________________ Hugo Ramiro <subincor Chinese Medicine Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:06:07 PM Re: Re: Ayurveda-- & medicines of the future Hi Margi: Can't see how being dismissive of the past can lead to good things. Standing on the shoulders of giants... Without knowing our origins we will become watered down. If the past isn't important, then only the now and the future are, and we end up enmeshed, once again, in our modern myth of 'progress'. Hugo ____________ _________ _________ __ Hugo Ramiro http://middlemedici ne.wordpress. com http://www.middlemedicine.org ____________ _________ _________ __ margi.macdonald <margi.macdonald@ gmail.com> Thursday, 17 September, 2009 8:45:20 Re: Ayurveda-- & medicines of the future Traditional_ Chinese_Medicine , Yangchu Higgins <ycmgh wrote: > " In many circles the search for " orgins " is considered a blind alley... Medicine like language changes constantly, taking on a life of its own, relevant to the particularities of its context. " Yet it is the future which may be more intriguing for adherents of any traditional medicine, in the face of allopathy's current dominance, and the fact that we humans literally and figuratively cross-fertilize with each other. In 200 years - assuming we continue to migrate, integrate and comunicate at blistering speeds - how do we imagine our medical models will be? What will they be called? Who will practice them? Will being custodians of 'origins' and the 'past' help to maintain the coherence of CM - and other traditional healing systems - or will the sweet young things of the future become ever more dismissive of the past, and ancient histories? Margi Macdonald Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.