Guest guest Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 While in many areas of my life I have been called " hard core " or a " purist " I have definitely gotten past the " I'll only use what I'd eat on my the outside " or " Its food so its got to be ok for my skin " Two quick examples off the top of my head ... I'll eat habanera peppers, but I wouldn't DARE put them on my skin! On the other hand I am super strict about not eating hydrogenated oils (ask my hubby who has dubbed me the " food nazi " but I'll use them on my skin as the reasons I won't eat them have nothing to do with skin application. Soy wax is hydrogenated soy oil, olive wax (and butter) is hydrogenated olive oil, etc ... Then we get into the " solvent extracted " area .. carnauba wax is a solvent extracted wax. Absolutes are solvent extracted. Many vegetable oils are solvent extracted (not all, but many). Do I prefer to use stuff that hasn't been solvent extracted, SURE! Do I get totally anal about it at this point - well, not as much, but I still won't use synthetic fragrance oils ... and I do generally prefer to use things that haven't been solvent extracted, but I'm not about to toss my jasmine absolutes or carnation absolute out the window either How natural IS an essential oil even - when you're exposing plant material to an unnatural heat which is a catalyst that causes it to fractionate into different parts and chemical components and not retain all of its original botanical composition (or in the case of blue chamomile oil - new chemical components are actually created - the azuline) ... Do I try to stay as much of a purist as possible - I sure do .. as I said - I don't use synthetic fragrances, synthetic FD & C colors (in or outside the body), etc ... but do I use chemicals extracted from botanical sources sometimes ... I don't know of a " vitamin E bush " that secretes drops of pure vitamin E oil *lol* - but I'll use natural source vitamin E for a variety of purposes What is natural is a great question! To some folks unless whatever it is stays exactly as it was when it came out of the ground it is not natural (I am on some raw foods lists that have folks on them that believe cooking food in any way is unnatural), while folks on the other end of the spectrum say " well, crude oil and petroleum comes out of the ground, so all those products are natural source too " ! Then you have everything in between ... I suppose it is something we have to all figure out for ourselves and some days I am in a stricter mood than others (with skin items, not with food - when it comes to food I'm a " nazi " every day , but it is not a cut and dry black and white issue, that is for sure ... *Smile* Chris (list mom - going to bed now that I've blah blah'ed y'all with my two cents for the night http://www.alittleolfactory.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 Thank you, Chris, for the excellent post... there is indeed complexity here. It's been enough to make me consider using an oil blend, perhaps thickened with a small percentage of butters, instead of lotion... an option that's still on the table. I'm lucky to have escaped the " food nazi " title, although it's probably not undeserved :-) But I'm still not so sure about putting something like hydrogenated oils on my skin. First, I'm not sure that the science is there--do we know these things aren't absorbed? My impression is that we still have a long way to go in understanding our skin, absorption, and related topics. Second, on a not so scientific note, how does processing affect the energetics of the ingredients? There seems to be a fine line between simply using parts, and the fragmentation connected to use of refined ingredients. I'm still undecided, for example, on fractionated coconut oil... coconut oil of course being a great example of something I love on skin but won't eat (regardless of what the more recent science says, the clinical experience still says otherwise). What I've read says mechanically processed carnauba is available... as opposed to, say, candelilla... and my concern with solvent extracted items doesn't just have to do with the traces of solvent left in the product, but also with supporting a market for those solvents. Hexane is a petroleum product and a pollutant. I want to be part of lessening, if not ending, its use, not sustaining it. I don't own any absolutes (yet?) Of course, if I'm going to compromise anywhere, trust me to compromise for jasmine! :-) So with food the question I ask isn't, " Is it natural? " but " Is it whole? " , which kind of obviates the former. And the whole foods framework I've been using then looks at derivatives and judges them by their effect. The ones with effects we want are viewed more as medicinals, rather than nutritives--for use as long as indicated. For example, oils are *not* whole foods. And so they're taken for specific reasons, in specific ways. Olive oil is just about the only one recommended for regular use. Omega-3 oils and others until an imbalance is addressed, but the ideal is that the diet is designed to promote and sustain balance after that. I would change what you said slightly... I would say that we " get " to figure it out for ourselves. I love that we get to choose what we're comfortable with, make decisions based on the system(s) that resonate for us, and be completely irrational when we want as well. It's a day to day thing for me--you should see the commercial crap I've been rubbing on my clients ;-) Even with the food, I compromise a lot more than I would like right now. That generally looks like eating out (there are NO whole foods restaurants here in SF, none that I know about anyway), but can also look like buying non-grass fed beef, or <gasp> cheaper chocolate :-D BTW, have you all had Rapunzel brand chocolate? Oh. My. God. }{ugs, Josh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 Hi Chris: I think the bigger question is: why food nazi, why obsessed with what goes in the body and on the skin? It's a late-20th Century cultural and societal phenom. I was a food nazi at 18, with macrobiotics. Then vegan (before the word vegan was known). I grew up and got over it, since I'm not the parent or caretaker for my friends, I had no right to diss what they ate. I actually didn't do that, I would just champion my lifestyle. That's called being a boor. I decided to stop being boorish. 100 years ago the life expectancy was mid-40s. People are living longer now, often twice that, or more, and the obsession seem to be control your food and you'll live longer still. (Controlling environmental pollutants is a close second, and in the case of chemical dump sites, I agree.) No big point to make here, just some early-morning musings on the obsession. My German grandmother ate pork and sugar and used Avon crap on her skin, and went to take a nap and died peacefully. At 89. I like that we can control what we want to use on and in our bodies more now, but I draw the line at " friends " who, when dining, dissect every carb, fat, or whatever molecule being taken in, while reciting their latest doctors reports and/or fad obsession. Shut up, boor. Many of us reject chemically-laden foods, perfumes, and other personal items because we have had bad reactions, allergies and the like. That makes sense, I'm sure they did that even 100 years ago. The unhealthy aspect of this knowledge and wanting to make everyone in your sphere of influence (mothers like Chris excepted because they're the gatekeepers for the family, ditto wives and husbands for their own union) is that it tends to create factions and fractions among people who should be united. Let someone use a product they don't " approve " of, and the user is maligned. Nasty, but true, and I'm sure many of you have suffered from " political correctness nazis " . Boors. They should stay out of your personal business, or let you live your professional life as you want, yet they'll resort to attacks to " convince " you. Yeah, that'll work, lol. I'm reminded of the story of Alex Wek, a famous Sudanese model. As a child, she had terrible psoriasis on her body. The other children shunned her, and she was in pain. Her aunt came to visit, took one look at her, and slathered her head-to-toe in petroleum vaseline. Within a week, the psoriasis was gone. Won't work for everybody, sure, but it did for her. Good thing, too. Don't forget this is the land where shea and other natural butters are readily available. <shrug> It's all just really mindboggling. Nobody knows everything, and we should look more to what unites us - the desire to use nice, natural products on our body and in our body -- and less at what divides us, whether it be political correctness or product correctness, otherwise we may shorten our lives through stress. End of musings re: looking back at almost 40 years of seeing the rise of " health " consciousness in America. http://naturalperfumery.com The premier site on the Web to discover the beauty of Natural Perfume " The Age of the Foodie is pass & #65533;. It is now the Age of the Scentie. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 Hi Anya, It seems like you're talking about two different things, and I'm having trouble figuring out which of your thoughts applies to which. The first thing is being " obsessed with what goes in the body and on the skin " ... the second is being a nazi or boor about it. And of course I don't think the latter invalidates the former :-) Plenty of boors, I know... I read your post with a smile, remembering times I've been with such people, and the times I've BEEN that person :-) I'm glad to have not seen that in this discussion, though... so refreshing on the 'net, too, where conversations so quickly devolve into flame wars. I haven't felt maligned by anyone regarding where I'm coming from, and I hope no one's felt maligned by me. It's been a pleasure having these conversations with you folks. It's also interesting to see the range... from folks who don't mind making lotion out of Crisco, to others I've talked with who won't use polysorbates and such, and everything in between. So, on to some of the other things you brought up. Sure, some people grow quite old and die peacefully doing all kinds of things... and people die young doing all kinds of things. I don't know that staving off death is what it's *really* about. I think much of it is about *what* will kill us, rather than *when*. For example, the reason I cut corn syrup out of my food consumption is because of its link with diabetes. However, I didn't feel like I was denying myself anything... quite the opposite... I feel offended by what we let companies get away with calling " food " , especially as I've learned more about whole foods and the connections between processed food and disease. Anyway, beyond the links to degenerative diseases, there are more immediate benefits, such as improved digestion, fewer cravings/balanced blood sugar, nervous system/brain function benefits, enhanced immunity, emotional harmony, facilitating better relationships with food and our bodies, etc. Not that most things advertised for " health " or " fitness " concentrate on these... plenty are concerned only on changing appearances--less size with fad diets, more size with weights--or providing placebo benefits, such as the processed- " but organic! " -foods sold in health food stores. These are the types of things that give health consciousness a bad name, I think. Such an abundance of misnomers in our culture: " health food " that depletes, rather than nurtures... " fitness " that has nothing to do with fitting into our bodies... and now, " whole grain bread " that isn't ;-) I'm with you on focusing on the things that unite us--and I think taking a holistic view means also seeing how our choices are connected to the other people we share the planet with. I'm not sure how taking better care of our cars than our bodies aligns with that... and that's about folks doing nothing, not folks doing someone else's notion of the " wrong " thing. Anyway, lately I try simply to hold space for complete freedom, and make information available to those who are interested when it naturally comes up. One has so much more*influence* in one's sphere of influence that way ;-) }{ugs, Josh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.