Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Latest on vitamins-oils next?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Thought some of you may find the below of interest. This court

decision has relevance to similar legislation on fragrance

ingredients. Now that the food supplements industry in Europe has

lost their battle, this means no one is going to challenge European

Commission decisions on essential oil restrictions, at the European

court. It is now looking increasingly likely that the sale of neat

Tea tree oil will in the near future be banned as well as its use in

many products. My guess is that will be followed by other essential

oils. You think this wont happen in the USA - watch this space!

 

Martin Watt

http://www.aromamedical.com

Please only email me via my website not this Lycos address

==========================

 

Published: Tue, 12 Jul 2005

 

The EU's highest court has ruled in favour of tough new Europe wide

controls in the health supplements market.

 

The proposal - known as the EU food supplements directive - bans

around 200 food supplements across the EU and puts restrictions on

the upper limits of vitamin doses.

 

Under laws backed by the European Court of Justice on Tuesday

supplements will only be able to include vitamins and minerals from

an approved list.

 

Vitamins taken off the list include boron and sulphur, and 1000mg

Vitamin C tablets.

 

Tuesday's ruling goes against an opinion delivered by the same

court's advocate-general in April, which argued that the law should

be scrapped due to procedural anomolies.

 

The judges have now backed new laws saying in a statement

that: " A 'positive list' system is appropriate for securing the free

movement of food supplements and ensuring the protection of human

health. "

 

The directive, approved by EU governments in 2002, is designed to

regulate the fast growing market in " health food " products, including

natural remedies, vitamin supplements and plant extracts.

 

BEUC, the European consumers organisation welcomed the ruling as " a

clear victory for European consumers and for the EU's right to

regulate on the safety of food products. "

 

The Food Supplements Directive is due to come into force on August 1

this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

On a related note .. for folks who DON'T want to see stuff like this

happen here in the US ...

 

*Smile*

Chris (list mom)

http://www.alittleolfactory.com

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

http://www.stopcafta.com/

 

Notify everyone you can think of!

 

Below is a sample letter.

 

Dear Congressman _______,

 

I am very concerned about the coming CAFTA vote and this summary will

explain to you and your Legislative Advisors just what CAFTA brings.

CAFTA membership sets the US up for excessive, restrictive, global trade

guidelines for vitamins and minerals as just passed 7/4/05, in the 28th

General Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission.

 

No one has believed that this could happen here. If you agree to CAFTA,

you will be party to bringing this nightmare to our country. This is

something your constituents will be extremely upset to have passed. It

will affect us all! Imagine coming down with a cold and going to the

drug or health food store to buy Vitamin C, 1000 or even 500 milligrams,

finding that it is illegal! International agreements have been passed,

which we will be forced to obey, if we are signatory to CAFTA. They

lower available vitamin dosages to non-effective amounts and replace

natural with ineffective synthetics.

 

My friends, family, co-workers and the people of this country are

closely watching this issue.

 

Respectfully yours,

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

On Behalf Of aromamedical2003

 

 

Thought some of you may find the below of interest. This court

decision has relevance to similar legislation on fragrance

ingredients. Now that the food supplements industry in Europe has

lost their battle, this means no one is going to challenge European

Commission decisions on essential oil restrictions, at the European

court. It is now looking increasingly likely that the sale of neat

Tea tree oil will in the near future be banned as well as its use in

many products. My guess is that will be followed by other essential

oils. You think this wont happen in the USA - watch this space!

 

Martin Watt

http://www.aromamedical.com

Please only email me via my website not this Lycos address

==========================

 

Published: Tue, 12 Jul 2005

 

The EU's highest court has ruled in favour of tough new Europe wide

controls in the health supplements market.

 

The proposal - known as the EU food supplements directive - bans

around 200 food supplements across the EU and puts restrictions on

the upper limits of vitamin doses.

 

Under laws backed by the European Court of Justice on Tuesday

supplements will only be able to include vitamins and minerals from

an approved list.

 

Vitamins taken off the list include boron and sulphur, and 1000mg

Vitamin C tablets.

 

Tuesday's ruling goes against an opinion delivered by the same

court's advocate-general in April, which argued that the law should

be scrapped due to procedural anomolies.

 

The judges have now backed new laws saying in a statement

that: " A 'positive list' system is appropriate for securing the free

movement of food supplements and ensuring the protection of human

health. "

 

The directive, approved by EU governments in 2002, is designed to

regulate the fast growing market in " health food " products, including

natural remedies, vitamin supplements and plant extracts.

 

BEUC, the European consumers organisation welcomed the ruling as " a

clear victory for European consumers and for the EU's right to

regulate on the safety of food products. "

 

The Food Supplements Directive is due to come into force on August 1

this year.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think some clarification is needed here b/c it was my understanding from

the original post that it was the EU that passed the " anti-vitamin C " laws

and this petition Chris just posted is attributing it to the UN and Central

American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)??

 

I think this is a bait and switch of the extreme right to get more people to

side with their " end of American Independence and way of life " hogwash

regarding international cooperation.

 

While I do not want to see Vitamin C becoming illegal this seems like there

is a bit of smoke and mirrors going on here.

 

How exactly does the Central American Free Trade Agreemtn CAFTA have

anything to do with the EU?

 

At the very least, I would be careful about actually sending the below

message to your congressional representatives as it seems to be incorrect in

attributing the EU's new laws to the UN (and then trying to pass that off

onto the upcoming CAFTA vote ... which seems to be a confusing stretch)

 

... unless I missed something and the UN actually did pass a new guideline

.... is that what the EU's ruling was based on?? I guess I need to go find

more articles related to this ... I don't have time right now, but I'll

share anything I uncover. If anyone has any further information

 

The whole world has gone mad. It IS something in the water, isn't it???

 

 

-

" Christine Ziegler " <chrisziggy

 

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:49 AM

RE: Latest on vitamins-oils next?

 

 

On a related note .. for folks who DON'T want to see stuff like this

happen here in the US ...

 

*Smile*

Chris (list mom)

http://www.alittleolfactory.com

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

http://www.stopcafta.com/

 

Notify everyone you can think of!

 

Below is a sample letter.

 

Dear Congressman _______,

 

I am very concerned about the coming CAFTA vote and this summary will

explain to you and your Legislative Advisors just what CAFTA brings.

CAFTA membership sets the US up for excessive, restrictive, global trade

guidelines for vitamins and minerals as just passed 7/4/05, in the 28th

General Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission.

 

No one has believed that this could happen here. If you agree to CAFTA,

you will be party to bringing this nightmare to our country. This is

something your constituents will be extremely upset to have passed. It

will affect us all! Imagine coming down with a cold and going to the

drug or health food store to buy Vitamin C, 1000 or even 500 milligrams,

finding that it is illegal! International agreements have been passed,

which we will be forced to obey, if we are signatory to CAFTA. They

lower available vitamin dosages to non-effective amounts and replace

natural with ineffective synthetics.

 

My friends, family, co-workers and the people of this country are

closely watching this issue.

 

Respectfully yours,

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

On Behalf Of aromamedical2003

 

 

Thought some of you may find the below of interest. This court

decision has relevance to similar legislation on fragrance

ingredients. Now that the food supplements industry in Europe has

lost their battle, this means no one is going to challenge European

Commission decisions on essential oil restrictions, at the European

court. It is now looking increasingly likely that the sale of neat

Tea tree oil will in the near future be banned as well as its use in

many products. My guess is that will be followed by other essential

oils. You think this wont happen in the USA - watch this space!

 

Martin Watt

http://www.aromamedical.com

Please only email me via my website not this Lycos address

==========================

 

Published: Tue, 12 Jul 2005

 

The EU's highest court has ruled in favour of tough new Europe wide

controls in the health supplements market.

 

The proposal - known as the EU food supplements directive - bans

around 200 food supplements across the EU and puts restrictions on

the upper limits of vitamin doses.

 

Under laws backed by the European Court of Justice on Tuesday

supplements will only be able to include vitamins and minerals from

an approved list.

 

Vitamins taken off the list include boron and sulphur, and 1000mg

Vitamin C tablets.

 

Tuesday's ruling goes against an opinion delivered by the same

court's advocate-general in April, which argued that the law should

be scrapped due to procedural anomolies.

 

The judges have now backed new laws saying in a statement

that: " A 'positive list' system is appropriate for securing the free

movement of food supplements and ensuring the protection of human

health. "

 

The directive, approved by EU governments in 2002, is designed to

regulate the fast growing market in " health food " products, including

natural remedies, vitamin supplements and plant extracts.

 

BEUC, the European consumers organisation welcomed the ruling as " a

clear victory for European consumers and for the EU's right to

regulate on the safety of food products. "

 

The Food Supplements Directive is due to come into force on August 1

this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Here ya go Bonnie - a link to the U.S. Codex Office

http://tinyurl.com/96pum

The aim of Codex is to " harmonise " world food trade/standards -

http://tinyurl.com/9dkjv this one takes you to " Understanding the Codex

Alimentarius "

" From their beginnings, FAO and WHO have assisted in the improvement of

quality and safety standards applied to food. The highest priority of the

Codex Alimentarius Commission, as stated in Article 1 of its statutes, is to

protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the food trade "

 

Note the words " safety standards " in the above sentence........

The EU Supplement Directive was passed on the basis of " consumer safety "

and applies to all of the EU.

Under Codex harmonisation this - so called - " consumer safety " measure will

(eventually) applied to all Countries that are members of the WHO (World

Health Organisation)

Check here

http://tinyurl.com/8bols for Member Countries.......

http://tinyurl.com/aphhn takes you to the WHO deliberations and reports on

suppliments........

HTH

Liz

 

 

On 13/07/05, Bonnie Walker <webgrrl wrote:

>

> I think some clarification is needed here b/c it was my understanding from

> the original post that it was the EU that passed the " anti-vitamin C " laws

>

> and this petition Chris just posted is attributing it to the UN and

> Central

> American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)??

>

> I think this is a bait and switch of the extreme right to get more people

> to

> side with their " end of American Independence and way of life " hogwash

> regarding international cooperation.

>

> While I do not want to see Vitamin C becoming illegal this seems like

> there

> is a bit of smoke and mirrors going on here.

>

> How exactly does the Central American Free Trade Agreemtn CAFTA have

> anything to do with the EU?

>

> At the very least, I would be careful about actually sending the below

> message to your congressional representatives as it seems to be incorrect

> in

> attributing the EU's new laws to the UN (and then trying to pass that off

> onto the upcoming CAFTA vote ... which seems to be a confusing stretch)

>

> ... unless I missed something and the UN actually did pass a new guideline

> ... is that what the EU's ruling was based on?? I guess I need to go find

> more articles related to this ... I don't have time right now, but I'll

> share anything I uncover. If anyone has any further information

>

> The whole world has gone mad. It IS something in the water, isn't it???

>

>

> -

> " Christine Ziegler " <chrisziggy

> < >

> Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:49 AM

> RE: Latest on vitamins-oils next?

>

>

> On a related note .. for folks who DON'T want to see stuff like this

> happen here in the US ...

>

> *Smile*

> Chris (list mom)

> http://www.alittleolfactory.com

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

> http://www.stopcafta.com/

>

> Notify everyone you can think of!

>

> Below is a sample letter.

>

> Dear Congressman _______,

>

> I am very concerned about the coming CAFTA vote and this summary will

> explain to you and your Legislative Advisors just what CAFTA brings.

> CAFTA membership sets the US up for excessive, restrictive, global trade

> guidelines for vitamins and minerals as just passed 7/4/05, in the 28th

> General Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission.

>

> No one has believed that this could happen here. If you agree to CAFTA,

> you will be party to bringing this nightmare to our country. This is

> something your constituents will be extremely upset to have passed. It

> will affect us all! Imagine coming down with a cold and going to the

> drug or health food store to buy Vitamin C, 1000 or even 500 milligrams,

> finding that it is illegal! International agreements have been passed,

> which we will be forced to obey, if we are signatory to CAFTA. They

> lower available vitamin dosages to non-effective amounts and replace

> natural with ineffective synthetics.

>

> My friends, family, co-workers and the people of this country are

> closely watching this issue.

>

> Respectfully yours,

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

>

>

> On Behalf Of aromamedical2003

>

>

> Thought some of you may find the below of interest. This court

> decision has relevance to similar legislation on fragrance

> ingredients. Now that the food supplements industry in Europe has

> lost their battle, this means no one is going to challenge European

> Commission decisions on essential oil restrictions, at the European

> court. It is now looking increasingly likely that the sale of neat

> Tea tree oil will in the near future be banned as well as its use in

> many products. My guess is that will be followed by other essential

> oils. You think this wont happen in the USA - watch this space!

>

> Martin Watt

> http://www.aromamedical.com

> Please only email me via my website not this Lycos address

> ==========================

>

> Published: Tue, 12 Jul 2005

>

> The EU's highest court has ruled in favour of tough new Europe wide

> controls in the health supplements market.

>

> The proposal - known as the EU food supplements directive - bans

> around 200 food supplements across the EU and puts restrictions on

> the upper limits of vitamin doses.

>

> Under laws backed by the European Court of Justice on Tuesday

> supplements will only be able to include vitamins and minerals from

> an approved list.

>

> Vitamins taken off the list include boron and sulphur, and 1000mg

> Vitamin C tablets.

>

> Tuesday's ruling goes against an opinion delivered by the same

> court's advocate-general in April, which argued that the law should

> be scrapped due to procedural anomolies.

>

> The judges have now backed new laws saying in a statement

> that: " A 'positive list' system is appropriate for securing the free

> movement of food supplements and ensuring the protection of human

> health. "

>

> The directive, approved by EU governments in 2002, is designed to

> regulate the fast growing market in " health food " products, including

> natural remedies, vitamin supplements and plant extracts.

>

> BEUC, the European consumers organisation welcomed the ruling as " a

> clear victory for European consumers and for the EU's right to

> regulate on the safety of food products. "

>

> The Food Supplements Directive is due to come into force on August 1

> this year.

>

>

Step By Step Instructions On Making Rose Petal Preserves:

> http://www.av-at.com/stuff/rosejam.html

>

> To adjust your group settings (i.e. go no mail) see the following link:

> /join

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Bonnie,

 

There is language in CAFTA mandating that the US " harmonize with CODEX " . .

..

http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/index.cfm?action=Events & ID=54

http://brain.hastypastry.net/forums/showthread.php?t=88941

http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/update07.13.05.htm

http://weblog.vitaminlady.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/8/1007536.html

 

In addition to this step backwards for health choice and freedom, there are

already disturbing human rights issues that suggest we should oppose CAFTA.

Some webs to peruse on this:

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040202 & s=engler (a good report in the

Nation from Mark Engler)

http://www.wola.org/economic/cafta.htm

http://www.citizen.org/trade/cafta/

http://www.cispes.org/english/Campaign_Against_CAFTA_FTAA/

http://www.stopcafta.org/

http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/globaleconomy/cafta_ftaa_main.cfm

 

Be well,

Marcia Elston, Samara Botane, http://www.wingedseed.com

" First of all, cultivate a contented spirit; a garden is a good place to

begin. "

 

 

________________________________

 

On Behalf Of Bonnie Walker

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:50 PM

 

Re: Latest on vitamins-oils next?

 

 

I think some clarification is needed here b/c it was my understanding from

the original post that it was the EU that passed the " anti-vitamin C " laws

and this petition Chris just posted is attributing it to the UN and Central

American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...