Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 >'Anecdotal knowledge' IS herbalism and aromatherapy ... way back ourancestors didn't have GC/MS analysis or any other analysis< Yes that's right but you seem to ignore the fact that traditional medicine took thousands of years to develop and in that time many people died as the result of inaccurate information. Nowadays herbal medicine is backed by substantial amounts of scientific studies. Unevaluated herbal knowledge spread by amateurs who have not studied the subject properly is in itself very dangerous indeed. They have rarely studied modern knowledge on the subject which can prove traditional remedies were not always safe or effective. Here I am not referring to CM as she has got some good knowledge. I am referring to the amateurs on the newsgroups who pick up snippets of information from books or the web and then come onto newsgroups as knowledgeable when they are not. >I strongly believe that a whole natural extract used in the right< >dilution can never be as harmful as its lab-isolated orchemically- reproduced equivalent.< Well your belief system is unsound. Are you suggesting that ricin is safe at great dilutions? It's a perfectly natural substance. Are you suggesting it is safer and more effective to inject poppy extract into someones veins when they are in agony rather than morphine? Are you suggesting that expressed bergamot oil is safer if diluted and used by someone living at high altitude than a processed version or even a synthetic equivalent? In reality many synthetic fragrance materials are known to be far safer on the skin than their natural equivalents. That does not mean I am recommending synthetics, but beliefs should be based on facts not suppositions. In the case of this discussion on natural preservatives it is well documented that hardly any are safer than the equivalent synthetic ones. Even citrus seed extract is often itself preserved with synthetic preservatives and I am not aware of any skin safety testing. I have seen the results of using benzoin on a young ladies face and it was just dreadful. I have photos of two cases of bergamot oil photosensitisation also on the face from only 3 years ago. Likewise very disfiguring. >In France they banned medical herbalism< No they did not. What they banned was traditional healers from offering medical type treatments for payment. There is nothing in France to stop individuals treating themselves or their families with herbs. Martin , <jane@a...> wrote: > Hi Christa > 'Anecdotal knowledge' IS herbalism and aromatherapy ... way back our ancestors didn't have GC/MS analysis or any other analysis ... just what their parents and grandparents taught them. We may be 'proving' it with science now but 'accepted wisdom' amongst cultures the world over is not to be sniffed at. We're talking about personal choices here ... I strongly believe that a whole natural extract used in the right dilution can never be as harmful as its lab- isolated or chemically-reproduced equivalent. > I just know I'm about to get shot down in flames but I'll take that risk ... you stick to the knowledge you're happy with. In France they banned medical herbalism in 1940-something and now all their plant- lore is disappearing. There is even an ethno-botanical museum created just to keep growing strains of the wild plants previously used medicinally and they have created a record from all the 'old' people of the surrounding villages of what was used for what. > Here is their site .... > http://www.musee-de-salagon.com/ > Best wishes > Jane > > - > Christa Maria > > Wednesday, December 15, 2004 1:28 PM > Re: Re:Preservatives/Styrax benzoin > > > When I wrote about balsam poplarbuds tincture and Benzoin, I just passed > on anecdotal knowledge. > Not scientific one. > This is what I was told by Keewaydenoqua* ( she taught ethnic botany) > AND had a good functioning knowledge of phytochemistry, > That the tincture would do as a preservative AS Benzoin would do. > That does not mean it would have the same effects a commercial Benzoin, > nor that the poplar Balsam may not have it's own problems. > I just don't know. Don't know if anyone has taken poplar balsam buds to > investigate. > The original question was , what there was out there on a 'natural' > preservative. > I gave my 2 scents, am not a phyto Chemist. > However, if Martin would say not to use it, I'll go along with it, for > he has mor eknowledge in this field than anyone and I trust his research. > C-M > > Ojibway wise woman and for many years my friend and teacher.She has > passed on. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 Told y'all I'd get shot down in flames for my personal beliefs! Jane - aromamedical2003 Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:17 PM Re:Preservatives/Styrax benzoin-to jane >'Anecdotal knowledge' IS herbalism and aromatherapy ... way back ourancestors didn't have GC/MS analysis or any other analysis< Yes that's right but you seem to ignore the fact that traditional medicine took thousands of years to develop and in that time many people died as the result of inaccurate information. Nowadays herbal medicine is backed by substantial amounts of scientific studies. Unevaluated herbal knowledge spread by amateurs who have not studied the subject properly is in itself very dangerous indeed. They have rarely studied modern knowledge on the subject which can prove traditional remedies were not always safe or effective. Here I am not referring to CM as she has got some good knowledge. I am referring to the amateurs on the newsgroups who pick up snippets of information from books or the web and then come onto newsgroups as knowledgeable when they are not. >I strongly believe that a whole natural extract used in the right< >dilution can never be as harmful as its lab-isolated orchemically- reproduced equivalent.< Well your belief system is unsound. Are you suggesting that ricin is safe at great dilutions? It's a perfectly natural substance. Are you suggesting it is safer and more effective to inject poppy extract into someones veins when they are in agony rather than morphine? Are you suggesting that expressed bergamot oil is safer if diluted and used by someone living at high altitude than a processed version or even a synthetic equivalent? In reality many synthetic fragrance materials are known to be far safer on the skin than their natural equivalents. That does not mean I am recommending synthetics, but beliefs should be based on facts not suppositions. In the case of this discussion on natural preservatives it is well documented that hardly any are safer than the equivalent synthetic ones. Even citrus seed extract is often itself preserved with synthetic preservatives and I am not aware of any skin safety testing. I have seen the results of using benzoin on a young ladies face and it was just dreadful. I have photos of two cases of bergamot oil photosensitisation also on the face from only 3 years ago. Likewise very disfiguring. >In France they banned medical herbalism< No they did not. What they banned was traditional healers from offering medical type treatments for payment. There is nothing in France to stop individuals treating themselves or their families with herbs. Martin , <jane@a...> wrote: > Hi Christa > 'Anecdotal knowledge' IS herbalism and aromatherapy ... way back our ancestors didn't have GC/MS analysis or any other analysis ... just what their parents and grandparents taught them. We may be 'proving' it with science now but 'accepted wisdom' amongst cultures the world over is not to be sniffed at. We're talking about personal choices here ... I strongly believe that a whole natural extract used in the right dilution can never be as harmful as its lab- isolated or chemically-reproduced equivalent. > I just know I'm about to get shot down in flames but I'll take that risk ... you stick to the knowledge you're happy with. In France they banned medical herbalism in 1940-something and now all their plant- lore is disappearing. There is even an ethno-botanical museum created just to keep growing strains of the wild plants previously used medicinally and they have created a record from all the 'old' people of the surrounding villages of what was used for what. > Here is their site .... > http://www.musee-de-salagon.com/ > Best wishes > Jane > > - > Christa Maria > > Wednesday, December 15, 2004 1:28 PM > Re: Re:Preservatives/Styrax benzoin > > > When I wrote about balsam poplarbuds tincture and Benzoin, I just passed > on anecdotal knowledge. > Not scientific one. > This is what I was told by Keewaydenoqua* ( she taught ethnic botany) > AND had a good functioning knowledge of phytochemistry, > That the tincture would do as a preservative AS Benzoin would do. > That does not mean it would have the same effects a commercial Benzoin, > nor that the poplar Balsam may not have it's own problems. > I just don't know. Don't know if anyone has taken poplar balsam buds to > investigate. > The original question was , what there was out there on a 'natural' > preservative. > I gave my 2 scents, am not a phyto Chemist. > However, if Martin would say not to use it, I'll go along with it, for > he has mor eknowledge in this field than anyone and I trust his research. > C-M > > Ojibway wise woman and for many years my friend and teacher.She has > passed on. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 You did not get shot down, Jane...you just got Martinized... Personally, I would never get peeved to be shot down by Martin, as I know he has much more knowledge than I have, in a much deeper scientific way. I might know more what the Natives in my area used, but could in no way scientifically substantiate it. Martin can and has done that, extensively. I respect true knowledge. When it comes to herbalism, I've been blessed to have some of the best teachers one could have. My grandmother in childhood,several Ojibway/Ottawa Elders in my region , especially Keewaydenoqua who also had a degree in botany and taught at the University of Milwaukee as well as every summer on an unpopulated island in Lake Michigan, primitive and the 'old' way. Joyce Wardwell, who is my buddy, living close by and who wrote a wonderful little herbal book.She also has much common sense and works it with modern medicine when necessary. In general, the only herbs I work with are the ones I know and was taught by someone I trusted. I never had the guts to just study a book and go from there... I need to see the plant grow, the whole environment with it and have experimented myself what the plant does. That does not mean that I don't' read herbal books, got about over 100 of them and there is not ONE that gives me all of it that I would want to know.. I agree with Martin that just book reading or ' I've heard that' can at times, be a dangerous thing. Plants ARE medicine and not exactly harmless. About ' natural' ! What a misnomer. Uranium is natural...! I bought a goose for Christmas the other day. The label said, ' All natural north american goose'... Hmm, I did not expect to find a decoy made out of plastic at the store.. C-M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 Martin, This is one of the reasons why I looked to learning from you. Birth knowledge is the same type of arena. We 'know' so much anecdotally but we birth care providers cannot stem nor change the tide of medicalized birth without having proven what we 'know.' On the one hand it's painful to constantly bang your head into the wall seeing time after time the harm and ill conceived perception that birth is safe only when you have that damn electronic fetal monitor or that breaking the bag of waters helps speed labor or that induction MUST be done. We could not begin to reach women beyond the scope of those who just 'knew' in their hearts that those were scary things. We had to have research to back it up. I've had attorneys in my classes and fast track career moms with college degrees that I will probably never have the time to go after myself. They would have walked out on my class if I did not have sound research or documentation to back-up information I had that was directly in conflict with the medical establishment. On the other hand there are some things that I will never be able to prove such as babies remember their births. I have my own personal little story that confirms that. I can relate it to couples. It is not a medically proved story but it certainly has swayed many a couple regarding their original birth and labor beliefs. Then of course, and this I believe Martin can really relate to, there is the pain of having your documentation and research resources and STILL people continue the way they do. Jane, I am quite certain that you may feel that Martin is being that 'troll' that some folks mention and some folks think it here but keep it to themselves. You and the others should know that Martin is on the right track in getting this information out. It's a very hard road to take. I take it a lot and sometimes ask myself how much longer I can continue. Martin is not attacking you or anyone else personally. He is righting the huge wrong in the mounds of misinformation that is out there that could really hurt people. He sees it in others besides YL. He sees it when someone gets the wrong information from the starting blocks. That is my concern too with birth. Why I will keep doing what I do - did I just say that I'm going to continue? I try to reach women so that their first birth experience is a positive one and is a strong foundation to build their family and home. Martin tries to reach aromatherapists so that they have an educated foundation to stand on and what they give to others as a service provider becomes a positive and healthy experience for them. Think of the people we all know who would never try aromatherapy. Most likely they either have a firm belief in the medicalized way of health, think AT is all hype (and if you look at what the majority of people refer to as AT it is) or some new age, hippie concept. You and I and a host of others on this list are representing a very small percentage of people who practice or provide AT to others. It is the same in the birth world...I believe less than 1.5% of births occur at home with about 5% occurring in free standing birth centers was the last statistic I saw and a small percentage of unassisted births being unaccounted for. I would say the odds of truly educated and knowledgeable practicing AT folks is around the same with the complementing majority percentage going for the medicine based on 'research.' Jane, I hope - before I read the next post where I see your name - that you did not take Martin's post here the wrong way. He comes across very blunt sometimes and he knows that about himself. I know from the course I am taking with him. He is also very protective and caring of his students and how they will take care of others. It takes tremendous foresight and perseverance to use that as your guide. Butch, I see that you posted right after Jane. Such obvious clues to what I believe I will find as I read further. Butch, I really hope that you were the kind person that I've grown accustomed to seeing. I will admit, speaking to you as a friend, that I did see one or two replies from you that came back a little unlike you. If I'm guessing right, well you all see my replies here first!! Dale - aromamedical2003 Wednesday, December 15, 2004 6:17 PM Re:Preservatives/Styrax benzoin-to jane >'Anecdotal knowledge' IS herbalism and aromatherapy ... way back ourancestors didn't have GC/MS analysis or any other analysis< Yes that's right but you seem to ignore the fact that traditional medicine took thousands of years to develop and in that time many people died as the result of inaccurate information. ... snip .... Well your belief system is unsound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 No Jane!! You're a sweetheart and you know so much. I'm sure there are more people besides myself that understood what you meant by your post. Martin just took the parts of your post that could be mis-interpreted by others and addressed it quickly. Dale - jane Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:30 AM Re: Re:Preservatives/Styrax benzoin-to jane Told y'all I'd get shot down in flames for my personal beliefs! Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.