Quackwatch unveiled?

[Guest guest]

I still have access to YL pages as a previous distributor and in

their virtual log in access - they list a link that refutes the

quackwatch site....It's a pdf file and is 18 page...and while

most of it of course is complimentary to GY and YL - I did find

the info on Dr. Barret and the other guy on his site very

disconcerting - they sound worse than GY!

 

Trying to be objective here on both sides....since I'm kinda in

the 'middle' of the oil thing with my mom who is deeply into YL

and her 'better than mine' oils....so if anyone has any

clarification on this paper that YL wrote, would appreciate it.

If this is OT - personal replies are appreciated too.

 

http://enews.essentialscience.net/welcome.exm

 

Blessings,

Pam

 

TLC Naturally - Pure Essential Oils & Soaps

http://www.tlcnaturally.com

E Web Express - Design & Hosting Service

http://www.ewebexpress.com

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

, " Pam " <pam@e...> wrote:

> I still have access to YL pages as a previous distributor and in

> their virtual log in access - they list a link that refutes the

> quackwatch site....It's a pdf file and is 18 page...and while

> most of it of course is complimentary to GY and YL - I did find

> the info on Dr. Barret and the other guy on his site very

> disconcerting - they sound worse than GY!

>

> Trying to be objective here on both sides....since I'm kinda in

> the 'middle' of the oil thing with my mom who is deeply into YL

> and her 'better than mine' oils....so if anyone has any

> clarification on this paper that YL wrote, would appreciate it.

> If this is OT - personal replies are appreciated too.

>

> http://enews.essentialscience.net/welcome.exm

>

> Blessings,

> Pam

 

 

Well, in reading the Quackwatch site for other " articles " --I couldn't

believe what I was reading. That guy (Barret) being awarded or

praised for his viewpoints on health issues? I mean the guy is a

psychiatrist --not a medical doctor.

 

I took everything that I read there and threw it out the window... I

don't trust anything that a psychiatrist has to say. Psychiatrists

push pills... dangerous pills/medications made from

petro-chemicals.... what good would he possibly have to say about

vitamins... it most certainly does sound like the backing of special

interests. This guy attacks many of the basics by which I live my

life. What would make me take his word about anything else?

 

I didn't like what I read about the DDS that partners with him

regarding his stance on " mercury fillings are not bad for you " .

Sorry... I'm married to a DDS... he and I have both done the research

on this one and there are **no** silver fillings placed in his office.

We have never trusted the ADA either... full of ________, they are.

 

Okay, Quackwatch bashes YL/GY and YL/GY bashes Quackwatch. Do I know

if any of the statements on either side are true? Nope. But I did

read quite a few things on the Quackwatch site that are disconcerting

to me. I don't trust them at all.

 

I do not have any researched data about YL or GY. I still have

nothing to add to this debate other than I will never use undiluted

oils on myself or family and that I do not understand why some are

willing to take what Steven Barret has stated on his web site as " the

truth " . What happened to research instead of just trusting someone's

heresay?