Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31, 2009??????

[Guest guest]

For a video presentation of this

material...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmrF9KjlGsc & feature=PlayList & p\

=620C418DC70E7F99 & playnext=1 & playnext_from=PL & index=22

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmrF9KjlGsc & feature=PlayList & p=620C418DC\

70E7F99 & playnext=1 & playnext_from=PL & index=22>

------\

---------------

Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)

Summarized in 7 Points

HealthFreedomUSA.org, the website of the Natural Solutions Foundation,

is beholden to no one: our only interest is health freedom. Rima E.

Laibow, MD, successful natural medicine physician since the 1970s, has

studied 16,000 pages of Codex documentation. Her conclusion is that

people who say that Codex is " consumer protection " ,

" voluntary " , or " harmless " are, at best, seriously

mistaken.

 

Codex in Depth: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161>

1) Started in 1962 by UN, Imposed by WTO Sanctions

Codex Alimentarius was created in 1962 as a trade Commission by the UN

to control the international trade of food. Its initial intentions may

have been altruistic but it has been taken over by corporate interests,

most notably the pharmaceutical, pesticide, biotechnology and chemical

industries.

 

Codex Alimentarius is backed up by the crippling trade sanctions of the

World Trade Organization (WTO). Any non Codex-compliant nation would

face huge economic punishment since they would automatically lose in any

food-trade dispute with a Codex compliant country.

2) " Nutrients are Toxins " Is Junk Science

Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) has two committees which impact

nutrition.

 

One of them, the " Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special

Dietary Uses " (CCNFSDU), is chaired by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, a

physician who believes that nutrition has no role in health. This is the

" top-guy " for Codex nutritional policy, and he has stated

<http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/11/25/codex_2003_grossklaus_a\

nd_mathioudakis_nutrition_not_relevant_to_health.htm> that

" nutrition is not relevant to health " .

 

As unbelievable as it may sound, Dr. Grossklaus actually declared

nutrients to be toxins in 1994 and instituted the use of toxicology

(Risk Assessment) to prevent nutrients from having any impact on humans

who take supplements! It is worth mentioning that Dr. Grossklaus happens

to own the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and Codex on this

issue. This company makes money when its toxicology services are used

for the " assessment " of nutrients. Here in the U.S. we call that

a " conflict of interest " .

 

Codex is made up of thousands of standards and guidelines. One of them,

the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), is designed to permit only

ultra low doses of vitamins and minerals (and make clinically effective

nutrients illegal). How can the VMG restrict dosages of vitamins and

minerals? By using Risk Assessment (toxicology) to assess nutrients.

 

While Risk Assessment is a legitimate science (it is a branch of

toxicology), it is the wrong science for assessing nutrients! In fact,

in this context, it is actually junk science

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_science> . Biochemistry, the science

of life processes, is the correct science for assessing nutrients. Codex

Alimentarius treats nutrients as toxins, which is literally insane.

 

Nutrients are not toxins - they are essential for life.

 

No matter what Codex Alimentarius officials say to convince you that

Risk Assessment is a " science-based " approach to nutrients, it

is not.

 

And it is worth repeating that Dr. Grossklaus, the head of Codex

Alimentarius, owns the Risk Assessment company advising CCNFSDU and

Codex on the " benefit " of using Risk Assessment to assess

nutrients.

3) Not Consumer Protection - That's Propaganda

Contrary to the propaganda, Codex Alimentarius has nothing to do with

consumer protection. Nothing! Codex is about the economic ambitions of

multi-national corporations, in particular, the pharmaceutical industry.

 

Using their multi billion-dollar marketing budgets, these industries

have launched a massive media propaganda campaign to paint Codex

Alimentarius as a benevolent tool of " consumer protection " , as

well as to negatively taint the image of natural health options and

mislead people to fear them as " dangerous " , so they will take

drugs (which really are dangerous). Natural health products and options

have an amazing safety record

<http://www.doctoryourself.com/testimony.htm> and are remarkably

effective, especially when compared to pharmaceutical drugs.

 

Unfortunately, one-time defenders of health freedom such as National

Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible

Nutrition (CRN) have joined the propaganda bandwagon and are spreading

false information

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=160> saying that

Codex Alimentarius is either " harmless " or benevolent

" consumer protection " . Neither is true.

 

The membership of these one-time defenders of health freedom has become

permeated by people from the pharmaceutical industry (for example, CRN

counts as its members corporations such as Monsanto® and Bayer®).

4) Codex: Serious Threat to Health and Health Freedom

If Codex Alimentarius is implemented in the United States of America,

therapeutic dosages of vitamins and minerals (and all other nutrients

soon to follow) will become unavailable because they will literally

become illegal.

 

Here's how it would work, in a nut-shell:

 

Due to the junk science use of Risk Assessment

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=164> (toxicology) to

assess supposedly toxic nutrients, a false belief is being engineered

saying that " nutritional supplements are dangerous to people's

health " .

 

Using this false belief generates calls to " protect " people from

these " toxic " nutrients. After the calls come the bills

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/action/step2.shtml> to set ultra low

permissible dosages (remember, nutrients are deemed " dangerous

toxins " under this false belief). If enough of us and our

Congressional delegates buy this nonsense, we and Congress would blindly

comply with Codex Alimentarius' VMG. And blind compliance is what

the industries behind Codex Alimentarius intend.

 

Blind compliance goes hand-in-hand with lack of activism. This lack of

activism allows our protective laws, classifying nutrients as foods with

no upper limits (such as DSHEA), to be easily repealed and replaced with

draconian laws to classify nutrients as toxins. And

" harmonization " with the pro-illness, pro-pharmaceutical

industry Vitamin and Mineral Guideline is there to fill the void.

 

Only intentionally ineffective, ultra low dose supplements would be

legal, with or without a prescription, on the VMG list. If enough people

do not take action

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=183> , we can expect

to watch nutritional supplement manufacturers and, thus health food

stores, to go out of business, in a domino effect. The only player left

standing would be Big Pharma.

 

Therapeutic grade vitamins, minerals, and amino acids would be

eliminated from the marketplace (although a few low-dose supplements

would be allowed by Codex, as a symbolic measure to avoid suspicion

about their ulterior motive).

 

Natural health professionals would lose the tools of their trade

(nutritional supplements) and health conscious people would be unable to

choose natural health options for health promotion and disease

treatment.

 

And that is, in a nutshell, how Codex Alimentarius is poised to make

Natural and Nutritional Medicine (NNM) disappear from the legal health

world and go underground. Who benefits? Big Pharma.

 

It would take a few years for the above scenarios to be feasible (Codex

Alimentarius is meant to go into full global effect by 2010). The slower

the process takes, the less alarmed people will be. That's probably

the logic of the architects of Codex Alimentarius.

5) Serves Economic Interests of Sickness Industries Through WTO and

Napoleonic Code

More and more people are turning to natural health products globally.

The " wellness " trend is a major trend in today's society.

The more natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they buy.

The pharmaceutical industry, which is part of the " Sickness

Industry " , fears the inevitable shift toward natural health care.

 

Instead of accepting the will of the people and rethinking the future of

the pharmaceutical industry, the industry has decided upon an unethical

course of action: the use of deception and deceit to eliminate natural

health products completely.

 

Codex Alimentarius is a shrewd vehicle for protecting the pharmaceutical

industry from the loss of income it stands to suffer due to the

inevitable growth of natural healthcare.

 

Codex Alimentarius is the resistance of the dinosaurs to inevitability:

the burgeoning desire of humanity for a healthier, saner, and more

sustainable way of life.

 

The World Trade Organization (WTO) intends to force Codex Alimentarius

upon the nations of the world, including the U.S. This would be done

under the threat of massive economic sanctions if WTO-countries do not

comply with Codex Alimentarius.

 

Furthermore, Codex is based in the Napoleonic Code, not Common Law. That

means that under Codex Alimentarius, anything not explicitly permitted

is forbidden. Under Common Law, we hold that anything not explicitly

forbidden is permitted. The difference is the difference between health

freedom and health tyranny. Codex Alimentarius would be able to ban

supplements by default.

6) DSHEA Protects America From Codex Alimentarius

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA, 1994), an

American law classifying our supplements and herbs as foods (which can

have no upper limit set on their use), was passed by unanimous

Congressional consent following massive grass-roots support organized by

health food stores. Millions of American activists told Congress, in no

uncertain terms:

 

" Protect nutritional supplements as foods or we will remove you from

office " .

 

Congress listened and carried out the will of the people.

 

DSHEA appropriately classifies nutritional supplements as foods which

can have no upper limits set on their use. DSHEA recognizes that people

use nutrients safely to deal with their individually differing needs for

nutrients. The concept of biochemical individuality means that people

have different needs for nutrients at different times. Are nutrients

toxins? No, they are not toxins. They are substances essential to

prevent, treat and cure any chronic condition, in differing doses at

different times in different people.

 

DSHEA protects the US from Codex Alimentarius' deadly Vitamin and

Mineral Guideline. We must reach our Congressional members, educate them

about the facts on Codex Alimentarius and direct them to vote against

anything that would threaten DSHEA.

 

Congress holds the keys to our health freedom. And it is their job to

listen to us. Let's not allow cynicism to tell us otherwise. We did

it for DSHEA in 1994. We can do it again this year.

7) Your Action is Needed Now!

DSHEA is under significant legislative attack

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=186> right now. Your

letter-writing is crucial: if the members of Congress know that voting

against health freedom means losing their jobs come election time, they

will listen. Our job is to make sure they get the message loud and

clear. Take action via our 3 easy steps

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=183> and send

personalized emails to Congress right now.

 

After taking action on HealthFreedomUSA.org, consider getting together

with others in your area and visit your Congressional members in their

home offices <http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/> . If we wait, we lose

our health freedoms. Once we " HARMonize " with Codex, by the way,

we no longer have the right, while we belong to the WTO, to repeal or

change that " HARMonization " !

Conclusion

The objective of the pro-Codex Alimentarius multi nationals is to

" boil the frog slowly " so that we do not wake up to it in time

to avoid Codex.

 

Once we have " HARMonize " to Codex Alimentarius, as long as we

are in the WTO, we cannot amend or change what we've been

" HARMonize " to.

 

Codex Alimentarius will go into global implementation by December 31,

2009, unless We, the People, avert it. We must act now because right

now, with $758 Million spent on declared Congressional lobbying by Big

Pharma last year, there are members of Congress who are trying to

overturn DSHEA and allow Pharma-friendly free reign for Codex. If

protective laws like DSHEA are destroyed, the sanctioning power of the

autocratic WTO kicks in, and it will be impossible to get out from under

Codex Alimentarius. We can protect our access to high potency nutrients

and stave off an adulterated food supply only by putting pressure on

Congress.

 

If you would like more in-depth information about Codex Alimentarius

before taking action

<http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=183> , please click

here <http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=161> .

 

DID YOU KNOW:

 

The Natural Solutions Foundation protected infants world-wide through

our actions at the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special

Dietary Uses, Chiang Mai, Thailand, October 30-November 3, 2006 where we

made our fluoride dossier available to pro-health consortium Codex

member nations prior to and at the Codex Committee on Nutrition and

Foods for special Dietary Uses, Chiang Mai, Thailand, October

30-November 3, 2006. Largely because of our document, fluoride was

banned as an added ingredient in infant formula for healthy babies.