Guest guest Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Fibromyalgia Treatment Update: Complementary Therapies: Acupuncture In recent years, complementary and alternative therapies have garnered increased attention as potential treatments for fibromyalgia and are used by patients.[57] Acupuncture is a treatment in traditional Chinese medicine with more than 2500 years of history for use in chronic pain and has been suggested for use in fibromyalgia.[58,59] According to traditional Chinese medicine, fibromyalgia is caused by dysfunction of the liver, spleen and kidney that interrupts or depletes the body's internal energy (Qi) and blood flow, resulting in clinical symptoms.[60] Two recent randomized controlled studies examining acupuncture in fibromyalgia samples contribute to the body of well designed studies in this area; however, the studies do little to clarify the role of acupuncture as a possible treatment for fibromyalgia. In a well designed study, Assefi and colleagues[61*] randomized 100 acupuncture-naïve, fibromyalgia patients into one of four groups (actual acupuncture designed to treat fibromyalgia and three sham acupuncture). Participants received two treatment sessions per week for 12 weeks. After good adherence to the interventions (=80% of 24 sessions), no differences were seen between groups in any of the outcome variables - pain, fatigue, sleep quality, overall well-being and physical and mental function. Similar findings were seen in a study by Harris and colleagues,[62] where the level of analgesia reported was independent of needle placement or stimulation. Conflicting findings were reported by Martin and colleagues[63] from a randomized controlled trial in 50 patients with fibromyalgia, half of whom received six sessions of actual acupuncture and the other half sham acupuncture over 3 weeks. FIQ scores improved in both acupuncture and sham groups during treatment (6.7 compared with 4.0 points). One month after treatment ended, the acupuncture group maintained the improvement while the sham group scores receded toward baseline, resulting in a mean difference of 7.4 points on the FIQ total score (P < 0.007). Significant differences were also observed between groups in scores for pain severity, fatigue, and anxiety 1 month after treatment. Differences between groups in all measures were not sustained at 7-month follow-up. The studies by Assefi, Harris and Martin et al. provide examples of methodologic differences that may explain their disparate findings and intrinsic challenges associated with acupuncture trials. First, acupuncture is known to have a powerful placebo effect in these types of trials[64] and individuals with fibromyalgia have shown a strong placebo response in other blinded intervention trials.[35*] Second, needling has beneficial effects on the variables being measured in these studies independent of placement location.[62] Additionally, needling results in similar physiological responses in people with and without fibromyalgia.[65] Third, it is not known what dose of acupuncture is sufficient to produce reliable results in fibromyalgia patients. The three studies used different numbers of sessions in their intervention, with Martin having the fewest. A final difference is the source of study participants and a possible selection bias. This may best explain the difference in findings of Assefi and Martin et al. Assefi and colleagues[61*] recruited patients from outside their clinic, whereas participants in the study by Martin et al.[63] were recruited after successfully completing an affiliated fibromyalgia-treatment program. Patients who had recently succeeded in the treatment program had additional interaction time with clinical staff. This interaction history may have translated to greater confidence in the clinicians performing the study intervention and an increased credibility of the research team, which could have promoted a placebo effect. At this time, the benefits of acupuncture for treating fibromyalgia remain unclear and require well designed controlled trials to identify its potential role in managing this patient population. Treatment should center on evidence-based interventions. However, because studies have not reported safety issues unique to the person with fibromyalgia, acupuncture could be considered as an option in certain patients who are unresponsive or resistant to pharmacotherapy and self-management approaches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2009 Report Share Posted June 21, 2009 Thank you for this, Alon. Study results I have seen for acupuncture treatment of fibromyalgia have been varied; some pro, some con. My own experience as a person living with FM, and treating others who have it, is that acupuncture is indeed helpful for reducing and managing symptoms, increasing the patient's sense of available energy for activity, reducing fatigue, improving sleep, and reducing depression and stress. Over the years since I started studying TCM in 1997, I can also say my underlying constitutional (contributing) factors have also gradually improved. I see different patterns presenting among the FM-diagnosed population, but liver, qi, and blood stagnation are present in all of them, often with a mix of underlying deficiencies. LAc's should be aware that, just as FM patients present with different patterns, they commonly also present with different symptoms. For example, FM is most well-known as a pain disorder, but the pain presentation is extremely variable - and this is not well-known among practitioners. Pain varies from burning to aching to stabbing to paresthesias and more, and very commonly varies with weather changes. In my own case, I don't have a sensation of constant pain, but I am tender to the touch just about everywhere. My own greatest problematic symptom is muscle stiffness and cramping - which used to commonly persist for months at a time. With my own education in TCM helping me to make better choices in self-care, my FM symptoms are greatly reduced, to the point that for several months out of every year, I can almost say I no longer have it. The main things I do are keep my stress low, avoid foods that increase dampness and phlegm, daily Tai Qi, and acupuncture and herbs to address my underlying patterns. When I do have flareup, I do an auricular treatment focusing on the spine area, since my cramps always occur in the mid-thoracic area. LAc's who do not have fibromyalgia often have questions about what can be done to help patients who do have it. I hope this is helpful, and folks are always welcome to contact me if they get stuck in treating someone who has FM. Andrea Beth Traditional Oriental Medicine Happy Hours in the CALM Center 635 S. 10th St. Cottonwood, AZ 86326 (928) 274-1373 --- On Sun, 6/21/09, alonmarcus2003 <alonmarcus wrote: alonmarcus2003 <alonmarcus FM Chinese Medicine Sunday, June 21, 2009, 10:10 AM Fibromyalgia Treatment Update: Complementary Therapies: Acupuncture In recent years, complementary and alternative therapies have garnered increased attention as potential treatments for fibromyalgia and are used by patients.[57] Acupuncture is a treatment in traditional Chinese medicine with more than 2500 years of history for use in chronic pain and has been suggested for use in fibromyalgia.[58,59] According to traditional Chinese medicine, fibromyalgia is caused by dysfunction of the liver, spleen and kidney that interrupts or depletes the body's internal energy (Qi) and blood flow, resulting in clinical symptoms.[60] Two recent randomized controlled studies examining acupuncture in fibromyalgia samples contribute to the body of well designed studies in this area; however, the studies do little to clarify the role of acupuncture as a possible treatment for fibromyalgia. In a well designed study, Assefi and colleagues[61*] randomized 100 acupuncture-naïve, fibromyalgia patients into one of four groups (actual acupuncture designed to treat fibromyalgia and three sham acupuncture). Participants received two treatment sessions per week for 12 weeks. After good adherence to the interventions (=80% of 24 sessions), no differences were seen between groups in any of the outcome variables - pain, fatigue, sleep quality, overall well-being and physical and mental function. Similar findings were seen in a study by Harris and colleagues,[62] where the level of analgesia reported was independent of needle placement or stimulation. Conflicting findings were reported by Martin and colleagues[63] from a randomized controlled trial in 50 patients with fibromyalgia, half of whom received six sessions of actual acupuncture and the other half sham acupuncture over 3 weeks. FIQ scores improved in both acupuncture and sham groups during treatment (6.7 compared with 4.0 points). One month after treatment ended, the acupuncture group maintained the improvement while the sham group scores receded toward baseline, resulting in a mean difference of 7.4 points on the FIQ total score (P < 0.007). Significant differences were also observed between groups in scores for pain severity, fatigue, and anxiety 1 month after treatment. Differences between groups in all measures were not sustained at 7-month follow-up. The studies by Assefi, Harris and Martin et al. provide examples of methodologic differences that may explain their disparate findings and intrinsic challenges associated with acupuncture trials. First, acupuncture is known to have a powerful placebo effect in these types of trials[64] and individuals with fibromyalgia have shown a strong placebo response in other blinded intervention trials.[35*] Second, needling has beneficial effects on the variables being measured in these studies independent of placement location.[62] Additionally, needling results in similar physiological responses in people with and without fibromyalgia.[65] Third, it is not known what dose of acupuncture is sufficient to produce reliable results in fibromyalgia patients. The three studies used different numbers of sessions in their intervention, with Martin having the fewest. A final difference is the source of study participants and a possible selection bias. This may best explain the difference in findings of Assefi and Martin et al. Assefi and colleagues[61*] recruited patients from outside their clinic, whereas participants in the study by Martin et al.[63] were recruited after successfully completing an affiliated fibromyalgia-treatment program. Patients who had recently succeeded in the treatment program had additional interaction time with clinical staff. This interaction history may have translated to greater confidence in the clinicians performing the study intervention and an increased credibility of the research team, which could have promoted a placebo effect. At this time, the benefits of acupuncture for treating fibromyalgia remain unclear and require well designed controlled trials to identify its potential role in managing this patient population. Treatment should center on evidence-based interventions. However, because studies have not reported safety issues unique to the person with fibromyalgia, acupuncture could be considered as an option in certain patients who are unresponsive or resistant to pharmacotherapy and self-management approaches. --- Subscribe to the free online journal for TCM at Times http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com Help build the world's largest online encyclopedia for Chinese medicine and acupuncture, click, http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/wiki/CMTpedia and adjust accordingly. Please consider the environment and only print this message if absolutely necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Andrea As usual they are not saying patients did not feel better, they are saying several studies show no difference between sham and real 400 29th St. Suite 419 Oakland Ca 94609 alonmarcus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Folks, are we seeing a pattern here with the " scientific " research? Don Snow, DAOM, MPH, L.Ac. Chinese Medicine alonmarcus Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:51:28 -0700 Re: FM Andrea As usual they are not saying patients did not feel better, they are saying several studies show no difference between sham and real 400 29th St. Suite 419 Oakland Ca 94609 alonmarcus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.