Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

sedation and chai hu

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I agree with you, Hugo.  But if you read my discussions, I didn't initiate the

term xie to describe the action which resulted from my treatment, but rather

sedate.  There is no disagreement. As far as considering Chai Hu an herb which

sedates, I think I would agree, as it harmonizes Shao Yang,  and uninhibits

liver Qi stagnation. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Fri, 5/8/09, Hugo Ramiro <subincor wrote:

 

 

Hugo Ramiro <subincor

Re: Terminology and Etymology

Chinese Medicine

Friday, May 8, 2009, 10:31 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Yehuda and All:

 

--Yehuda-

 

sedatus which means to compose, moderate, or quiet. If before I

needle there is intercostal tenderness, burping and irritability, and

after I needle the patient is happy and calm, can I not say that they

are sedate (using the noun form)?

---

 

The root of sedate as you describe it would then fit comfortably with actions

such harmonization, regulation and balancing. Sedate, with a root as you

describe it, does not fit with drain.

 

Chai Hu is an herb which could, according to your definition, be described as

sedating. Huang Qin or Long Dan Cao, on the other hand, cannot be described in

this manner (since they drain), although they are likely to have a *secondary*

effect of " sedation " based on their dosage, combination and length of use.

 

Thoughts?

 

Hugo

 

____________ _________ _________ __

Hugo Ramiro

http://middlemedici ne.wordpress. com

http://www.chinesem edicaltherapies. org

 

____________ _________ _________ __

>

 

Friday, 8 May, 2009 2:48:21

Re: Terminology and Etymology

 

Again, Daniel, I refer back to the etymological root of sedate, the Latin term:

Remember, as I mentioned earlier in this discussion, sedation does not mean

numbing. That is anesthesia.

 

 

www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. net

www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. blogspot. com

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Daniel Schulman <daniel.schulman@ > wrote:

 

Daniel Schulman <daniel.schulman@ >

Re: Terminology and Etymology

 

Thursday, May 7, 2009, 9:23 PM

 

Obviously this is a debate that will go on forever. To put my two cents in - on

the one hand I do agree in instances that are particularly egregious that

correct terminology is important - and I do think 'sedation' is one of those

instances - because quite simply, no matter how you look at it, I don't see how

we can think we sedate anything with acupuncture - we do drain things and get

things moving where they are stuck. On the other hand, the dogmatism of the

etymological purists can go too far - I just don't see how 'torpid intake' is an

improvement over 'lack of appetite' or 'poor appetite' - I never knew the word

'torpid', still don't know it, I can't relate to it, my patients certainly can't

relate to it and referring to eating as 'intake' sounds bizarre too.

Regards

Daniel

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...