Guest guest Posted May 10, 2009 Report Share Posted May 10, 2009 I agree with you, Hugo. But if you read my discussions, I didn't initiate the term xie to describe the action which resulted from my treatment, but rather sedate. There is no disagreement. As far as considering Chai Hu an herb which sedates, I think I would agree, as it harmonizes Shao Yang, and uninhibits liver Qi stagnation. --- On Fri, 5/8/09, Hugo Ramiro <subincor wrote: Hugo Ramiro <subincor Re: Terminology and Etymology Chinese Medicine Friday, May 8, 2009, 10:31 AM Hi Yehuda and All: --Yehuda- sedatus which means to compose, moderate, or quiet. If before I needle there is intercostal tenderness, burping and irritability, and after I needle the patient is happy and calm, can I not say that they are sedate (using the noun form)? --- The root of sedate as you describe it would then fit comfortably with actions such harmonization, regulation and balancing. Sedate, with a root as you describe it, does not fit with drain. Chai Hu is an herb which could, according to your definition, be described as sedating. Huang Qin or Long Dan Cao, on the other hand, cannot be described in this manner (since they drain), although they are likely to have a *secondary* effect of " sedation " based on their dosage, combination and length of use. Thoughts? Hugo ____________ _________ _________ __ Hugo Ramiro http://middlemedici ne.wordpress. com http://www.chinesem edicaltherapies. org ____________ _________ _________ __ > Friday, 8 May, 2009 2:48:21 Re: Terminology and Etymology Again, Daniel, I refer back to the etymological root of sedate, the Latin term: Remember, as I mentioned earlier in this discussion, sedation does not mean numbing. That is anesthesia. www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. net www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. blogspot. com --- On Thu, 5/7/09, Daniel Schulman <daniel.schulman@ > wrote: Daniel Schulman <daniel.schulman@ > Re: Terminology and Etymology Thursday, May 7, 2009, 9:23 PM Obviously this is a debate that will go on forever. To put my two cents in - on the one hand I do agree in instances that are particularly egregious that correct terminology is important - and I do think 'sedation' is one of those instances - because quite simply, no matter how you look at it, I don't see how we can think we sedate anything with acupuncture - we do drain things and get things moving where they are stuck. On the other hand, the dogmatism of the etymological purists can go too far - I just don't see how 'torpid intake' is an improvement over 'lack of appetite' or 'poor appetite' - I never knew the word 'torpid', still don't know it, I can't relate to it, my patients certainly can't relate to it and referring to eating as 'intake' sounds bizarre too. Regards Daniel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.