Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Chinese Medicine , " " < wrote: " The underlying mechanism may be a kind of super-placebo effect produced by placebo and all non-specific factors working together. " " Non-specific factors " - are these the things which define one individual from another? Sham vs sham - are some 'sham' acupuncture interventions more of a 'sham' than others? 'off the point needling' - could still be in the channel? 'very superficial needling' - Japanese-style by accident? 'off-point-superficial needling' - see above 'points you wouldn't routinely use for that condition' - but which might be used in another setting according to 5 Phase theory, horarary theory, any other theory, or as adjunctive points when treating an underlying pattern? 'pretending to be administering acupuncture with a funny, fake doo- dad' - touching people makes things happen? and the last one: 'applying a one-size-fits-all point prescription protocol to an individual without regard to his or her TCM patterns of disharmony' - scam or sham? My sense is that medical research will really be onto something profoundly useful, when it seeks to understand the psycho-neuro- immunological-spiritual-biochemical processes and inter-relationships which are currently called placebo. Margi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Phil OR........ the underlying effect maybe very much tied to the effect of the Extra Cellular Matrix and specifically the fascia. When an AP needle maybe off point it still effects the channel/meridian as it enters into the fascia which is continuous. Richard Hi All, See this. AP May Benefit Patients with Low Back Pain: Verum AP, sham AP may be nearly twice as effective as conventional therapy. In patients with low back pain, both traditional Chinese verum AP and sham AP may be more effective than conventional therapy, researchers report in the Sept. 24 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine. Michael Haake, Ph.D., M.D., of the University of Regensburg in Bad Abbach, Germany, and colleagues randomly assigned 1162 patients to receive verum AP, sham AP or conventional therapy. After six months, the researchers found that the response rate (defined as a 33% improvement in pain or a 12% improvement in functional ability -- was 47.6% in the verum AP group, 44.2% in the sham AP group and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. " The superiority of both forms of AP suggests a common underlying mechanism that may act on pain generation, transmission of pain signals, or processing of pain signals by the central nervous system and that is stronger than the action mechanism of conventional therapy, " the authors write. " The underlying mechanism may be a kind of super-placebo effect produced by placebo and all non-specific factors working together. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of AP cannot be attributed merely to a placebo effect because there is no reason to believe that the action mechanism of conventional therapy is the result solely of the placebo effect. " Best regards, < traditional_Chinese_Medicine Sun, 2 Nov 2008 2:48 pm Super-placebo = effect produced by placebo + all non-specific factors working together Hi All, See this. AP May Benefit Patients with Low Back Pain: Verum AP, sham AP may be nearly twice as effective as conventional therapy. In patients with low back pain, both traditional Chinese verum AP and sham AP may be more effective than conventional therapy, researchers report in the Sept. 24 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine. Michael Haake, Ph.D., M.D., of the University of Regensburg in Bad Abbach, Germany, and colleagues randomly assigned 1162 patients to receive verum AP, sham AP or conventional therapy. After six months, the researchers found that the response rate (defined as a 33% improvement in pain or a 12% improvement in functional ability -- was 47.6% in the verum AP group, 44.2% in the sham AP group and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. " The superiority of both forms of AP suggests a common underlying mechanism that may act on pain generation, transmission of pain signals, or processing of pain signals by the central nervous system and that is stronger than the action mechanism of conventional therapy, " the authors write. " The underlying mechanism may be a kind of super-placebo effect produced by placebo and all non-specific factors working together. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of AP cannot be attributed merely to a placebo effect because there is no reason to believe that the action mechanism of conventional therapy is the result solely of the placebo effect. " Best regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Hi All, See this. AP May Benefit Patients with Low Back Pain: Verum AP, sham AP may be nearly twice as effective as conventional therapy. In patients with low back pain, both traditional Chinese verum AP and sham AP may be more effective than conventional therapy, researchers report in the Sept. 24 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine. Michael Haake, Ph.D., M.D., of the University of Regensburg in Bad Abbach, Germany, and colleagues randomly assigned 1162 patients to receive verum AP, sham AP or conventional therapy. After six months, the researchers found that the response rate (defined as a 33% improvement in pain or a 12% improvement in functional ability -- was 47.6% in the verum AP group, 44.2% in the sham AP group and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. " The superiority of both forms of AP suggests a common underlying mechanism that may act on pain generation, transmission of pain signals, or processing of pain signals by the central nervous system and that is stronger than the action mechanism of conventional therapy, " the authors write. " The underlying mechanism may be a kind of super-placebo effect produced by placebo and all non-specific factors working together. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of AP cannot be attributed merely to a placebo effect because there is no reason to believe that the action mechanism of conventional therapy is the result solely of the placebo effect. " Best regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.