Guest guest Posted May 13, 2010 Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 http://health-news.yu-ms.com/aol-health/study-finds-food-allergies-are-commonly-\ misdiagnosed/ If you're one of the 12 million Americans who has been diagnosed with a food allergy and have been lamenting the fact that you can't eat peanuts or have a toddler who cries because he can't have ice cream due to a milk allergy, you know how food allergies can impact not only your health but your quality of life. But a new study suggests that the alarming frequency of food allergies — 4 percent of adults have them — may reflect over-diagnosis. " Many people who get a diagnosis of food allergy could instead have a food intolerance, " says Dr. Matthew Fenton, chief of the Asthma, Allergy and Inflammation Branch of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. NIAID funded the newly released study on food allergy diagnoses by RAND Corporation, Stanford University and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, which appeared in the latest issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. The study, which reviewed more than 70 pre-existing studies on food allergies, indicates there are no consistent definitions of what constitutes a food allergy nor is there any uniformity for criteria in making food allergy diagnoses. Milk, eggs, peanuts and soy are the most commonly diagnosed food allergies and, by default, are most likely to be misdiagnosed. So why is this problematic? Fenton says that often the treatment for food allergies and intolerances is the same — avoiding the culprit food. But that's not always necessary, and he worries that some patients misdiagnosed with a food allergy may be unknowingly harming themselves. " If a patient is misdiagnosed and put on a restricted diet, she could be subject to nutritional deficiencies, " he says. Fenton says one major issue is that a fair number of people with food intolerance are being misdiagnosed. Whereas a food allergy involves an immune system response, food intolerance does not. He explains that someone who has a milk allergy must avoid dairy products in order to avoid immune system responses that could lead to anything from a skin rash to a more severe reaction like anaphylaxis, while someone with lactose intolerance does not necessarily have to avoid milk. He can take a lactase pill and still enjoy the nutritional benefits of dairy products. " What we're recommending as a result of this study is creating comprehensive food allergy diagnoses guidelines, " says Fenton. The study's researchers, led by a team at Stanford University, concluded that allergies afflict somewhere between 1 and 10 percent of the American population, but said it's unclear whether allergies are actually on the rise. Americans disagree: Thirty percent of us are convinced we have food allergies, which can be accompanied by diverse, vague and confusing reactions. Anything from nausea to a headache can indicate an allergic reaction. They also zeroed in on the allergens thought to be responsible for most reactions: eggs, milk, fish, and peanuts and tree nuts. A milk allergy, which affects less than 1 percent of Americans, can trigger fatal anaphylactic shock. Lactose intolerance, however, afflicts an estimated 75 percent of adults worldwide — but can be managed with avoidance and supplements. Right now there is no industry standard, and misdiagnoses are common, particularly for patients who don't have access or haven't been referred to an allergist. In order to accurately diagnose a food allergy, Fenton says a doctor must do three things: 1. Obtain a good patient history that includes a listing of patient symptoms and the foods that seem to cause those symptoms. 2. Laboratory tests, both a skin-prick test and a blood test, to measure the response of antibodies to a potential allergen. 3. An oral food challenge where the patient is given the potential allergen in increasing doses to track allergic response This should only be done by an experienced doctor at a facility where a severe allergic response could be promptly treated. Fenton advises patients to be proactive if they suspect a food allergy and to ask their doctors if they have the expertise to tell the difference between an allergy and an intolerance. Fenton also encourages patients to ask to see a specialist. http://health-news.yu-ms.com/aol-health/study-finds-food-allergies-are-commonly-\ misdiagnosed best wishes you and your healthy life style team http://www.yu-ms.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 I read that article and the thing that jumped out at me: "If a patient is misdiagnosed and put on a restricted diet, she could be subject to nutritional deficiencies," he says.Fenton says one major issue is that a fair number of people with food intolerance are being misdiagnosed. Scuse me but if a patient is misdiagnosed and NOT put on a restrictive diet they can get terribly ill for consuming foods to which their entire body is intolerant...... The article did not mention that one! Just my thoughts as I have been in that particular place myself. Just me in T I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.SPAMfighter has removed 27 of my spam emails to date.The Professional version does not have this message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.