CT scanners (Rapiscan) 100 X the X-Ray radiation dosage!!!

[Guest guest]

If you are going to fly, you’d better decide before

you go to the airport, whether you will accept this full body scan.  There is

NO safe level of radiation.  It is all destructive to your cells. One scan

emits 100 times the dosage of radiation you’d receive in an X-Ray, and

you know even the x-ray tech, has a lead apron and leaves the room!  I will NOT

fly if I have to have this.  They can search me if they need to, but they will

not scan me.  Make up your own mind!  You might also want to call or write the

airlines and tell them your thoughts.  If they think they’ll lose

business they’ll put pressure on the airports to back off.  Jan

 

 

CT scanners (Rapiscan) 100 X the X-Ray

radiation dosage!!!

==========

Despite the clearance of some CT scanners (Rapiscan), the FDA’s

website shows that no data has ever been presented to the agency as

to the safety of these devices and states that it has never approved

these devices as being safe because some Food and Drug

Administration officials were worried that full-body CT screening

scans (Rapiscans) may be exposing thousands of Americans to

unnecessary and potentially dangerous radiation and that CT scans

of the chest delivered 100 times the radiation of a

conventional

chest x-ray  between .2 to 2 rads of

radiation during a single scan. 

 

 

The government has been forcing

prisoners, the majority of whom

are Blacks and Hispanics, to be subject of these types of inhumane

experiments for years. They recall the Tuskegee

experiments, where

400 Black men were allowed to suffer with syphilis for 40 years so

that doctors could study the disease. Also, Dr.

Albert Kilgman, at

Holmesburg Prison near Philadelphia,

under the direction of major

pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Dupont, exposed Black

prisoners to herpes, gonorrhea, malaria, dysentery and even

athlete’s foot from the 1950s to the 1970s.

=========

 

http://snipurl.com/uztei [san

Francisco Bayview]

Prisoners forced to submit to radiation experiments for private

foreign companies

Posted By mary On March 20, 2010 @ 7:31 pm

 

by Eddie Milton Garey Jr.

 

The Rapiscan Secure 1000 has been called a virtual strip search.  

It shows a person’s private parts but obscures the face. Bush’s

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff heads the so-called full

body scanner lobby.

 

In Illinois,

federal judges have allowed at least two lawsuits to

proceed against correctional officials for using full body scanners

to reveal the anatomy of both prisoners and visitors without removing

their clothing. This is the very same device that airports are

seeking to implement on some inbound flights to the United States.

 

The cases of Young v. County of Cook, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 64404

(N.D. 111.), and Zboralshi v. Monohan, 616 Supp.2d 792, 798 (2006,

N.D. Ill), explain,  Rapiscan is a machine that uses back-

scatter x-ray technology to conduct a body scan.  There is no

significant difference between using Rapiscan and computer tomography

(CT scan) whole body scanning.

 

Despite the clearance of some CT scanners (Rapiscan), the FDA’s

website shows that no data has ever been presented to the agency as

to the safety of these devices and states that it has never approved

these devices as being safe because some Food and Drug

Administration officials were worried that full-body CT screening

scans (Rapiscans) may be exposing thousands of Americans to

unnecessary and potentially dangerous radiation and that CT scans

of the chest delivered 100 times the radiation of a conventional

chest x-ray, between .2 to 2 rads of radiation during a single

scan.   See, e.g., Virtual Physical Ctr-Rockville,

LLC v. Philips

Med. Sys., 478 F.Supp.2d 840, 842-43(D. Md.

2007) and FDA Raises

Body Safety Issue by Marlene Cimons in the Los Angeles Times, June

5, 2001.

 

The Federal Bureau of Prisons officials have been forcing inmates at

USP Big Sandy to submit to random computerized tomographic whole body

radioactive scanners. If they refuse to submit to these radiation

experiments, prison officials are charging them with disobeying a

direct order and subjecting them to a wide range of sanctions,

including but not limited to loss of good time credits, resulting in

an extended time in prison, even if they agree to be subjected to an

ordinary visual strip search as a reasonable alternative to radiation

exposure from the whole body scanner. These images are saved and

viewed by male and female staff and available online to certain

civilian populations.

 

Regulations at 28 CFR 512.11 and 512.12

prohibit the government

from using inmates for this type of experimentation and require them

to give both the inmates and the public notice of their intent to use

inmates as test subjects as well as all of the possible effects

related to being subjected to any such experimentation and then

only on a voluntary basis. See also Administrative Procedure

Act, 5

U.S.C. § 551(4) and 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)-(d).

 

Federal regulations also prohibit the use of x-ray, MRI or similar

devices on inmates for any reason other than legitimate medical

purposes or only when there exists reasonable suspicion that the

inmate has recently secreted contraband and then only by a

licensed practitioner in the manner set out in 28 CFR 552.13(b)

(1) and 541.48.

The government has been forcing prisoners, the majority of whom are

Blacks and Hispanics, to be subject of these types of inhumane

experiments for years. They recall the Tuskegee

experiments, where

400 Black men were allowed to suffer with syphilis for 40 years so

that doctors could study the disease. Also, Dr. Albert Kilgman, at

Holmesburg Prison near Philadelphia,

under the direction of major

pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Dupont, exposed Black

prisoners to herpes, gonorrhea, malaria, dysentery and even

athlete’s foot from the 1950s to the 1970s.

 

In 1952 over 300 Black inmates at an Ohio

state prison were injected

with live cancer cells so that doctors at the Sloan-Kettering

Institute could study the effects. In these cases the research

subjects’ rights were violated because either they were not told

that they were participating in an experiment or the government knew

the experiments had no therapeutic value, or both.

 

Other cases include Heinrich v. Sthemet, 62 F.Supp.2d 282(D.Mass.

1999) (government utilized false pretenses to lure plaintiffs into

participating in radiation experiments which the government knew had

no therapeutic value); Stadt v. Univ.

of Rochester, 921 F.Supp.

1023

(W.D.N.Y. 1996) (plaintiff, who thought she was receiving medical

treatment for scleroderma, was injected with plutonium without her

knowledge or consent as part of a U.S. Army study); In re Cincinnati

Radiation Litig., 874 F.Supp. 796 (S.D. Ohio 1995) (plaintiffs were

not informed that the radiation they were receiving from the

Department of Defense was part of a military experiment rather than

treatment of their cancer).

 

In Allen v. United States,

588 F.Supp. 247, 399 (D. Ut.

1984), the

court held that it is becoming established that shortening of life

span is a general effect of whole body exposure to ionizing

radiation. Experiments have also shown a similar reduction may be

caused by irradiation of substantial portions of the body from

ingestion of radioactive materials.

 

In all of those cases, both the state and

federal government had told

the subjects that they experimented on that the radiation levels were

harmless only for the victims to learn later that they were in

fact not harmless, but deadly!

 

It has also been reported that these whole

body Rapiscan scanners

have been malfunctioning. They have caused electrical shocks as

in

the case of Carrie Milton v. Rapiscan, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 11574

(E.D. La.).

An airport security screener was severely shocked and

suffered permanent injury to her hand operating one of these Rapiscans.

 

Independent tests on Rapiscan devices have also shown that the EEPROM

chips, which are used to calibrate the radiation levels of the whole

body scanners, have repeatedly malfunctioned, resulting in greater

radiation exposure than Rapiscan reports on its own websites. Some

prisoners have experienced blurriness of vision, headaches and groin

pains after being subjected to these whole body radiation scans.

Many

of these prisoners have been Rapiscanned up to three times in a

single day, even though they never left the institution or had any

contact with anyone outside the institution.

 

In the 1960s and 70s the Bureau of Prisons forced inmates

mostly Black and Hispanic prisoners to submit to radiation

exposure to their testes in order to study the effects. See the case

of Bibea v. Pacific Norththemst Research, 980 F. Supp. 349(D.Or.

1997); See also, Clay v. Martin, 509 F.2d 109(2d. Cir. 1974) (The

court reversed the decision that dismissed prisoner’s complaint

against defendants, federal government and prison officials, holding

that it was against public policy to dismiss the complaint on

pleading technicalities because the action involved experimentation

on humans.)

 

Other experiments include testing psychotropic narcotics on inmates

who have not been prescribed them just to see their effects, such as

in the recent case of Walker v. Hastings, 2009

U.S. Dist. Lexis

80924, Case No. 09-CV-074-ART(E.D.

KY). Walker was diagnosed with H

Pylori, a bacterium that can infect one’s stomach or intestines, but

was given Zyprexa, a psychotropic narcotic on at least nine different

occasions by a prison pharmacist at USP Big Sandy seeking to test the

effects of the medications for pharmaceutical companies.

 

If this is a legitimate security concern and not for the mere use of

inmates as test subjects for private interests of companies like

Rapiscan Corp., then ask the Obama administration, Eric Holder and

Department of Justice officials why are they threatening inmates and

charging them with disciplinary infractions for disobeying unlawful

orders to submit to these radiation experiments, even when they are

willing to submit to an ordinary strip search?

 

Update: Record long lockdown punishes cross-racial unity

 

The inmates have only refused to be

exposed to harmful amounts of

radiation and not to be the subject of a human radiation experiment,

but they never disobeyed any lawful orders. Yet on March 1, the

warden at USP Big Sandy

imposed a lockdown that is expected to last

at least two months.

 

The lockdown is clearly in retaliation against Black prisoners for

exercising their First Amendment rights to petition the government

for redress of grievances. Since this prison has been open, no

lockdown has lasted more than 21 days not even when there were

repeated back-to-back murders.

 

But when all the inmates have found common ground for unifying

lawfully, the federal white overseers have deemed this to be a threat

to the order, security and discipline of the institution.

 

This warden finds it a serious security threat when all of the

different factions of inmates decide not to focus on killing one

another but on coming together in peaceful, lawful challenges to

tyrants’ abuse of power in total, reckless disregard of our basic

human rights and bodily integrity. Even the skinheads, Aryan

Brotherhood and American Born whites came to an agreement with Blacks

not to be subject to these human radiation experiments.

 

To my knowledge, there were no threats of violence, there were no

 

assaults and there were no mass demonstrations  just individuals

refusing to be the government’s test dummy for this Rapiscan x-ray

product being illegally used on us in violation of the Code of

Federal Regulations. But if we had ganged up on an inmate, no such

lockdown would’ve occurred for more than a couple of days to a week.

 

Imagine that!

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Thanks Jan - only last week here on National Radio they were discussing the dangers of CT scanning ordered far to much by the average doc and wreaking havoc with people's health.

 

 

If you are going to fly, you’d better decide before you go to the airport, whether you will accept this full body scan. There is NO safe level of radiation. It is all destructive to your cells. One scan emits 100 times the dosage of radiation you’d receive in an X-Ray, and you know even the x-ray tech, has a lead apron and leaves the room! I will NOT fly if I have to have this. They can search me if they need to, but they will not scan me. Make up your own mind! You might also want to call or write the airlines and tell them your thoughts. If they think they’ll lose business they’ll put pressure on the airports to back off. Jan

 

 

[Guest guest]

There are people sensitive to the EMF waves emitted by the wires in their homes, power lines over their property, and even their cellphones. Why would anyone submit to the unnecessary radiation of these scanners? I won't stop flying if I need to but I won't let them scan me>--- On Mon, 3/22/10, Jan Slama <slamajama2 wrote:

Jan Slama <slamajama2 CT scanners (Rapiscan) 100 X the X-Ray radiation dosage!!!"Jan Slama" <slamajama2Monday, March 22, 2010, 1:38 AM

 

 

 

If you are going to fly, you’d better decide before you go to the airport, whether you will accept this full body scan. There is NO safe level of radiation. It is all destructive to your cells. One scan emits 100 times the dosage of radiation you’d receive in an X-Ray, and you know even the x-ray tech, has a lead apron and leaves the room! I will NOT fly if I have to have this. They can search me if they need to, but they will not scan me. Make up your own mind! You might also want to call or write the airlines and tell them your thoughts. If they think they’ll lose business they’ll put pressure on the airports to back off. Jan

 

 

CT scanners (Rapiscan) 100 X the X-Ray radiation dosage!!!==========Despite the clearance of some CT scanners (Rapiscan), the FDA’s website shows that no data has ever been presented to the agency as to the safety of these devices and states that it has never approved these devices as being safe because some Food and Drug Administration officials were worried that full-body CT screening scans (Rapiscans) may be exposing thousands of Americans to unnecessary and potentially dangerous radiation and that CT scans of the chest delivered 100 times the radiation of a conventional chest

x-ray between .2 to 2 rads of radiation during a single scan.

The government has been forcing prisoners, the majority of whom are Blacks and Hispanics, to be subject of these types of inhumane experiments for years. They recall the Tuskegee experiments, where 400 Black men were allowed to suffer with syphilis for 40 years so that doctors could study the disease. Also, Dr. Albert Kilgman, at Holmesburg Prison near Philadelphia , under the direction of major pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Dupont, exposed Black prisoners to herpes, gonorrhea, malaria, dysentery and even athlete’s foot from the 1950s to the 1970s.=========

http://snipurl. com/uztei [san Francisco Bayview]Prisoners forced to submit to radiation experiments for private foreign companiesPosted By mary On March 20, 2010 @ 7:31 pmby Eddie Milton Garey Jr.The Rapiscan Secure 1000 has been called a virtual strip search. It shows a person’s private parts but obscures the face. Bush’s Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff heads the so-called full body scanner lobby.

In Illinois , federal judges have allowed at least two lawsuits to proceed against correctional officials for using full body scanners to reveal the anatomy of both prisoners and visitors without removing their clothing. This is the very same device that airports areseeking to implement on some inbound flights to the United States .The cases of Young v. County of Cook, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 64404 (N.D. 111.), and Zboralshi v. Monohan, 616 Supp.2d 792, 798 (2006, N.D. Ill), explain, Rapiscan is a machine that uses back- scatter x-ray technology to conduct a body scan. There is nosignificant difference between using Rapiscan

and computer tomography (CT scan) whole body scanning.

Despite the clearance of some CT scanners (Rapiscan), the FDA’s website shows that no data has ever been presented to the agency as to the safety of these devices and states that it has never approved these devices as being safe because some Food and Drug Administration officials were worried that full-body CT screening scans (Rapiscans) may be exposing thousands of Americans to unnecessary and potentially dangerous radiation and that CT scans of the chest delivered 100 times the radiation of a conventional chest x-ray, between .2 to 2 rads of radiation during a single scan. See, e.g., Virtual Physical Ctr-Rockville, LLC v.

PhilipsMed. Sys., 478 F.Supp.2d 840, 842-43(D. Md. 2007) and FDA RaisesBody Safety Issue by Marlene Cimons in the Los Angeles Times, June5, 2001.The Federal Bureau of Prisons officials have been forcing inmates atUSP Big Sandy to submit to random computerized tomographic whole bodyradioactive scanners. If they refuse to submit to these radiationexperiments, prison officials are charging them with disobeying a direct order and subjecting them to a wide range of sanctions, including but not limited to loss of good time credits, resulting in an extended time in prison, even if they agree to be subjected to an ordinary visual strip search as a reasonable alternative to radiation exposure from the whole body scanner. These images are saved andviewed by male and female staff and available online to certain

civilian populations.Regulations at 28 CFR 512.11 and 512.12 prohibit the government from using inmates for this type of experimentation and require them to give both the inmates and the public notice of their intent to use inmates as test subjects as well as all of the possible effects related to being subjected to any such experimentation and then only on a voluntary basis. See also Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551(4) and 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)-(d).Federal regulations also prohibit the use of x-ray, MRI or similar devices on inmates for any reason other than legitimate medical purposes or only when there exists reasonable suspicion that the inmate has recently secreted contraband and then only by a licensed practitioner in the manner set out in 28 CFR 552.13(b) (1) and 541.48.The government has been forcing prisoners,

the majority of whom areBlacks and Hispanics, to be subject of these types of inhumaneexperiments for years. They recall the Tuskegee experiments, where400 Black men were allowed to suffer with syphilis for 40 years so that doctors could study the disease. Also, Dr. Albert Kilgman, at Holmesburg Prison near Philadelphia , under the direction of major pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Dupont, exposed Black prisoners to herpes, gonorrhea, malaria, dysentery and even athlete’s foot from the 1950s to the 1970s.In 1952 over 300 Black inmates at an Ohio state prison were injected with live cancer cells so that doctors at the Sloan-Kettering Institute could study the effects. In these cases the researchsubjects’ rights were violated because either they were not told that they were participating in an experiment or the government knew the experiments had no therapeutic value, or

both.Other cases include Heinrich v. Sthemet, 62 F.Supp.2d 282(D.Mass. 1999) (government utilized false pretenses to lure plaintiffs intoparticipating in radiation experiments which the government knew had no therapeutic value); Stadt v. Univ. of Rochester , 921 F.Supp. 1023(W.D.N.Y. 1996) (plaintiff, who thought she was receiving medical treatment for scleroderma, was injected with plutonium without her knowledge or consent as part of a U.S. Army study); In re Cincinnati Radiation Litig., 874 F.Supp. 796 (S.D. Ohio 1995) (plaintiffs werenot informed that the radiation they were receiving from the Department of Defense was part of a military experiment rather than treatment of their cancer).In Allen v. United States , 588 F.Supp. 247, 399 (D. Ut. 1984), thecourt held that it is becoming established that shortening of life span is a general effect of whole body exposure to ionizing

radiation. Experiments have also shown a similar reduction may becaused by irradiation of substantial portions of the body from ingestion of radioactive materials.In all of those cases, both the state and federal government had toldthe subjects that they experimented on that the radiation levels were harmless only for the victims to learn later that they were in fact not harmless, but deadly!It has also been reported that these whole body Rapiscan scannershave been malfunctioning. They have caused electrical shocks as inthe case of Carrie Milton v. Rapiscan, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 11574 ( E.D. La. ). An airport security screener was severely shocked andsuffered permanent injury to her hand operating one of these Rapiscans.Independent tests on Rapiscan devices have also shown that the

EEPROMchips, which are used to calibrate the radiation levels of the whole body scanners, have repeatedly malfunctioned, resulting in greater radiation exposure than Rapiscan reports on its own websites. Someprisoners have experienced blurriness of vision, headaches and groin pains after being subjected to these whole body radiation scans. Manyof these prisoners have been Rapiscanned up to three times in a single day, even though they never left the institution or had any contact with anyone outside the institution.In the 1960s and 70s the Bureau of Prisons forced inmatesmostly Black and Hispanic prisoners to submit to radiation exposure to their testes in order to study the effects. See the caseof Bibea v. Pacific Norththemst Research, 980 F. Supp. 349(D.Or. 1997); See also, Clay v. Martin, 509 F.2d 109(2d. Cir. 1974) (The court reversed the

decision that dismissed prisoner’s complaint against defendants, federal government and prison officials, holding that it was against public policy to dismiss the complaint on pleading technicalities because the action involved experimentation on humans.)Other experiments include testing psychotropic narcotics on inmateswho have not been prescribed them just to see their effects, such as in the recent case of Walker v. Hastings, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 80924, Case No. 09-CV-074-ART( E.D. KY ). Walker was diagnosed with H Pylori, a bacterium that can infect one’s stomach or intestines, but was given Zyprexa, a psychotropic narcotic on at least nine different occasions by a prison pharmacist at USP Big Sandy seeking to test the effects of the medications for pharmaceutical companies.If this is a

legitimate security concern and not for the mere use ofinmates as test subjects for private interests of companies like Rapiscan Corp., then ask the Obama administration, Eric Holder and Department of Justice officials why are they threatening inmates and charging them with disciplinary infractions for disobeying unlawful orders to submit to these radiation experiments, even when they are willing to submit to an ordinary strip search?Update: Record long lockdown punishes cross-racial unityThe inmates have only refused to be exposed to harmful amounts ofradiation and not to be the subject of a human radiation experiment, but they never disobeyed any lawful orders. Yet on March 1,

thewarden at USP Big Sandy imposed a lockdown that is expected to last at least two months.The lockdown is clearly in retaliation against Black prisoners forexercising their First Amendment rights to petition the government for redress of grievances. Since this prison has been open, nolockdown has lasted more than 21 days not even when there were repeated back-to-back murders.But when all the inmates have found common ground for unifyinglawfully, the federal white overseers have deemed this to be a threat to the order, security and discipline of the institution.This warden finds it a serious security threat when all of thedifferent factions of inmates decide not to focus on killing one another but on coming together in peaceful, lawful challenges to tyrants’ abuse of power in total, reckless disregard of our basic human rights and bodily integrity. Even

the skinheads, AryanBrotherhood and American Born whites came to an agreement with Blacks not to be subject to these human radiation experiments.To my knowledge, there were no threats of violence, there were no

assaults and there were no mass demonstrations just individuals refusing to be the government’s test dummy for this Rapiscan x-ray product being illegally used on us in violation of the Code of Federal Regulations. But if we had ganged up on an inmate, no suchlockdown would’ve occurred for more than a couple of days to a week.

Imagine that!