Here's what FAT ALBERT (aka ALGORE) isn't telling you in his quest to make money

[Guest guest]

 

 

----

 

 

Kimberly Dawley

5/01/2010 4:28:10 a.m.

Kimberly Dawley

Here's what FAT ALBERT (aka ALGORE) isn't telling you in his quest to make money

 

ED NOTE> When ALGORE proposes a complete halt to ongoing atmospheric military aerosols for military purposes, we'll know he's serious about "GLOBAL WARMING". Please also see the 2004 emails directly below this article which I sent out on this very subject!

 

Global Warming: An Effect of Weather Manipulation

 

Chinese Weather Rockets

 

 

We are being told to reduce our carbon footprints in an attempt to reduce the catestrophic effects of global warming. Will this do any good? Until we know the past and future effects of Global Governmental weather manipulation on our climate we cannot take steps to save our planet.

For the past twenty plus years, the planet has been subject to increasingly unusual weather patterns.

Governments are encouraging companies and individuals to reduce their carbon footprints to tackle “global warming” – caused by modern-day energy expenditure.

Is this the whole truth?

Weather control is not sci-fi, it is a reality, yet very little is publicised about it and the long term effects of weather manipulation are an unknown.

In the knowledge that if a country can control the weather, they can control the world, an Environmental Modification Treaty was signed or ratified by 70 of the world governments in 1977 to prevent hostile weather manipulation.

Actions that would contravene the treaty would be: triggering earthquakes, manipulating ozone levels, alteration of the ionosphere, deforestation, provoking flood or drought, use of herbicides, setting fires, seeding clouds, introduction of invasive species, eradication of species, creation of storms, destruction of crops.

Weather control is the ultimate weapon.

Forget nuclear weaponry, bombs, rockets and guns – weather control technology is the new weapon of mass destruction, the technology is the ultimate state / terrorist weapon and / or deterrent.

To assume that in signing the treaty, Governments would completely disregarded weather control research – the ultimate weapon – would be naïve to say the least.

Chinese Weather rockets at the Olympic Games held in Beijing in 2008

In June 08, the LA Times reported that in response to criticism of the 2008 Olympic Games being held in Beijing, China, during the rainy season, the Chinese Meteorological Bureau’s of weather modification had assured the public that they had set aside, 30 aeroplanes, 4000 rocket launchers, 7000 anti-aircraft guns to modify the weather to prevent rain.

The Chinese weather control would not be in contravention of the treaty, as it would be done without hostile intent, however, it proves that governments have invested in the research and development of weather control techniques.

The above picture is HAARP in Alaska – High frequency Active Aural Research – this is one of at least seven research facilities around the globe.

These facilities were built by the US to monitor the ionosphere, the outer defence of earths atmosphere.

The ionosphere retains the globes warmth and protects the planet from the suns solar flares – variations on any point of the ionosphere can severely affect the weather.

The facility can gather valuable information in respect of the earth’s atmosphere.

However, more worryingly, the facilities have an active capability to superheat specific points of the ionosphere, creating holes or incisions, which then allow solar flares to enter the atmosphere – thus significantly affecting weather conditions below.

Under the remit of serious research, the facilities do not contravene the Environmental Modification Treaty, however the technology has the potential to used as a weapon of mass destruction on a global scale.

Details are available on http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ion4.html

The Government website noted above, confirms that the HAARP facility has been actively tested.

An environmental study was carried out on the Alaskan facility in 1992 which concluded “all of the significant environmental impacts associated with HAARP Alaska can be mitigated to an acceptable level. Some insignificant potential impacts such as loss of habitat, socioeconomic and wildlife impacts may not be mitigated.”

Chinese preparing a rocket launcher

Further explanation of the ominous wording highlighted above, the immediate and long term effects of the use of the facility upon the environment / weather patterns and the military potential of the HAARP system are not listed on the website.

The Russian government have also developed Project Woodpecker- Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating Method.

The system was developed from experiments carried out by Nickola Tesla into electro magnetism and the potential to use the planets natural electromagnetism as an energy source which could be further developed for use as a powerful weapon.

Woodpecker transmitters emit ELF – extreme low frequency elecro-magnetic pulses.

The transmitters, positioned in facilities around the globe generate an electro-magnetic grid which circumnavigates the globe using natural high density water vapour trails as conductors (essentially five water vapour rivers which naturally occurring in both the North and South Hemispheres of the Earth’s atmosphere).

Disruption in their frequency acts as an early warning system for incoming missiles or aircraft.

Convergence of transmissions on the grid, at any pre-determined point, will disrupt the ionosphere, the release of electromagnetic energy pulses by the transmitters can either be used as a weapon and disrupt weather conditions

The Woodpecker system has the capability to disrupt the path of the Northern Hemispheres Jet Stream Flow – Which can, and may already have had cataclysmic effects upon the world’s weather patterns.

It was reported in the Wall Street Journal on 2nd October 1992, that a Russian Company called “Elite Intelligent Technologies” were selling weather control Technology with the slogan “Weather made to Order”. They claimed to be able to fine tune the weather over a 200 square mile radius for $200.00 per day.

This article only touches upon some of the technology involved in weather control / manipulation. There are many internet sites where weather manipulation and control is being discussed – Please take a look for yourself.

In conclusion, we cannot and must not trust the propaganda regarding global warming – until we are given the full facts regarding the short and long term effects of planetary weather manipulation/ weaponry.

The past and future consequences of weather manipulation cannot no longer be ignored or brushed off as conspiratorial sci-fi.

Until the public takes the time to research this topic for themselves, spreads awareness, loses the apathy and demands answers from who are elected to govern on our behalf, we, our children, and our planet will continue to hang on a precipice of oblivion.

Source

Also continue to read this related story:

Methods of Artificial Weather Manipulation(AWM) help agriculture, devastate the enemy and control the world economy

 

Engineers and Space Specialists are working towards something that can change human civilization forever! It is the methods of artificial weather modification.

The process when perfected, can help in agriculture, getting rid of droughts, floods and avoid cyclones and typhoons.

It is also the process by which the enemy can be devastated, artificial floods, cyclones and typhoons created.

It can allow controlling the world economy and agricultural commodity markets.

In ancient religions and legends, weather control, creation of cyclone, rain, flood, drought were nothing new. In the modern age the Scientists and technologists are busy perfecting the weather control sciences. It is shaping up as the most vibrant area of research and development.

Many countries are mastering the science of weather control. As a matter of fact many experts predict that a war game is being played by major powers in the world to demonstrate their capabilities of weather control. Most of these initiatives are classified and shoved off from the public. The only way one can track these initiatives is to look at countries taking actions to shield against weather control experiments.

Recently, scientists and engineers have started unveiling the actual methods of weather control. Some primitive methods like Cloud-top seeding can confuse you and point you to a wrong direction. Cloud-top seeding is usually performed between the temperatures of -5°C and -10°C. The greatest amount of super-cooled liquid water is usually found within this range. This corresponds to an altitude range of 15,000 to 22,000 ft depending upon location. Dropping or ejecting silver iodide flares into the growing cloud turrets dispenses seeding agent. The seeding agent is placed into the super-cooled clouds where nucleation is desired, so the updrafts in these cases are relied upon only to provide a continuing source of condensate. This delivery technique requires less anticipation on the part of those directing the seeding operations and may have a more immediate effect.

The more modern methods involve artificial ionization of earth’s atmosphere between 15,000 and 30,000 ft. and above. Manipulating the ionosphere and use of controlled solar-terrestrial interactions can create much larger effects. Scientists are realizing that the earth’s weather is controlled by Sun’s natural Electromagnetic Radiation reaching the earth. The Sun’s Radiations and Ultraviolet Rays have to cross the ionosphere to reach the earth.

There are early indications that the solar radiations and flares are directly responsible for planetary weather changes. And Solar flares and levels of radiations are caused by bombardment of cosmic rays on the Sun from either a distant massive black hole or a star-cluster caused by the collapse of thousands and thousands of stars in a small space.

Computer models obviously focused on the ionosphere, which acts as a filter for the solar radiations to reach the earth. If one can manipulate and control the filter, it becomes a potential source of massive weather modification. That is what the computer simulation models found. Controlling the ionosphere potentially allows weather control. The algorithmic variation of ionosphere can create the magic in a massive scale.

There are many methods of controlling the ionosphere. It is the process of artificially manipulating ion density in the ionosphere. High power transmitter and antenna array operating in the HF(High Frequency) range is one of the methods. There are lots of literature on that in the Internet and declassified scientific research journals.

However, the recent trend is in using super conductors in space satellites to generate intense high intensity electromagnetic flux.

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/01/global-warming-an-effect-of-weather-manipulation/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

KD Weber <wvadreamin

1/25/04 4:08 PM

GLOBAL WARMING & AEROSOLS

 

 

 

ED NOTE: Please look immediately below Mr. Carnicom's article here at my previous sends on this issue.

GLOBAL WARMING & AEROSOLSClifford E Carnicom Jan 23 2004

http://www.carnicom.com/sh1.htm

It can be demonstrated that the introduction of essentially any metallic or metallic salt aerosol into the lower atmosphere will have the effect of heating up that lower atmosphere. The impact is both significant and measurable. Those that seek and express concern on the so called global warming problem might wish to begin their search with an inquiry into the thermodynamics of artificially introduced metallic aerosols into the lower atmosphere. The direct injection of massive amounts of particulate matter by aircraft into the atmosphere for more than five years establishes the foundation for this inquiry. An examination of the specific heat characteristics of an altered atmosphere will provide the path for the realistic conclusions that can be made.

Any claim that the aerosol operations represent a mitigating influence on the global warming problem appears to be a complete facade that is in direct contradiction to the fundamental principles of physics and thermodynamics. The lack of candor and honesty by government, media and environmental protection agencies in response to public inquiry is further evidence of the fictitious fronts that have been proposed. It is past time to recognize that one of the primary effects of the dense aerosols that now permanently mar the lifeblood of this planet is the heating up of the very atmosphere that we breathe.

The early stage of the current argument for global heating and the aggravation of drought conditions was proposed approximately two years ago1. The benefit of the current study is that an estimate of the magnitude of the heat influence upon the atmosphere can now be made. Those that continue to claim a benevolent, but necessarily secret enterprise to protect the planet with a blanket of purportedly heat reflective aerosols in the lower atmosphere will need to provide the primary evidence of that claim. That claim will need to be justified with solid physical principles and observation. Hypothetical research models that are under discussion and rationalization, such as the Teller proposal, are more appropriate to the outer reaches of the planet and space. These proposals do not explain the deposition of massive amounts of hygroscopic aerosols into the lower atmosphere.

The recent media attention to the dramatic and accelerating climatic changes will hopefully be extended to the fundamental principles that are expressed within this report.

The mathematics, physical principles and thermodynamics of this argument will be made available on a separate entry.

 

FURTHER DISCUSSION:TO BE CONTINUED

1. Clifford E Carnicom, Drought Inducement, (http://www.carnicom.com/drought1.htm), 04/07/02

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

-

KD Weber

Friday, January 09, 2004 1:36 PM

Aerosol effects

 

Ed. note: Look carefully at what produces negative forcings.

 

December 15, 2003Volume 81, Number 50CENEAR 81 50 pp. 27-37ISSN 0009-2347http://pubs.acs.org/email/cen/html/121503135847.html CLIMATE PRODS These bars indicate in watts per square meter natural and human influences--called "forcings" in the climate-science community--that alter the flow of radiant energy in the atmosphere and cool or warm Earth by perturbing its energy balance. Positive forcings warm the planet, whereas negative ones cool it. The largest single positive forcing is CO2. Without major changes in fossil fuel burning, the forcing from CO2 is expected to grow much larger as the century progresses. Reflective aerosols, and the cloud changes that occur when clouds contain reflective aerosols, are negative forcings, but their magnitude is highly uncertain. Reflective aerosols include sulfates, nitrates, organic carbon, and soil dust.

-

KD Weber

Monday, January 12, 2004 4:58 PM

"Macro engineering" to combat climate change

 

 

ED NOTE: The bottom line is that the noticeable increase in "cirrus cloud cover" has been conclusively determined to be exerting a net warming effect on the global atmosphere. Next time you see them aerosoling, read an article about "climate change," or your neck of the woods gets hit by extreme weather think about this.

Edie weekly summaries 09/01/2004 Keeping you up to speed with news and events from around the world.

 

 

 

 

Front Page

UK

Europe

International

News Releases

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thought experiment on macro engineering to combat climate change

http://www.edie.net/gf.cfm?L=left_frame.html & R=http://www.edie.net/news/Archive/7912.cfm

 

An international conference looking at macro engineering solutions to climate change management and mitigation has taken place this week, with a view to deciding what ideas are plausible for further scientific research.

Seeding oceans with iron filings, sending millions of tiny helium balloons into the atmosphere and carbon sequestration will all be on the discussion agenda for scientists attending the conference organised by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and the Cambridge MIT Institute.

"We urgently need to explore the feasibility of imaginative and new ideas for reducing global warming in the future, either by slashing carbon dioxide emissions, or by counteracting its effects, if we are to avoid dangerous climate change," said Professor John Shepherd, a Director of the Tyndall Centre.

The event is the first of its kind to be held, and is operating under the premise that it will be a 'thought experiment', offering scientists the opportunity to discuss the feasibility of some macro engineering proposals - some of which have already been described by organisers of the event as 'crazy'.

"That is why they should be evaluated (and if necessary dismissed) as soon as possible. Otherwise, politicians may seek to use them as 'magic bullets' either to postpone action, or as prospective solutions for actual implementation, once it becomes clear that the mitigation of climate change is going to be a major and very difficult task," say the organisers.

They are hoping this will become the first in a symposium of events on the role macro engineering will play in combating climate change.

Sending millions of tiny helium balloons up into the upper atmosphere to reflect the suns trapped rays from the earth back into the atmosphere is a possible option, on the macro level, to fight global warming, a spokesperson for the Tyndall Centre explained to edie. Another potential climate change management tool could be to seed ocean beds with iron filings, thereby encouraging algae growth, which would in turn sequester more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, in a similar way to trees.

"Most of these macro-engineering options are not yet in the mainstream for climate policy, but the mere fact that they have been suggested, places an obligation on scientists from many disciplines to explore their feasibility and evaluate their consequences and wider implications," said Professor Shepherd.

"If it turns out that conventional proposals to mitigate warming don't deliver then governments and industry can look towards these options. At any rate such large scale measures are useful for scientists to have up their sleeves," said the spokesperson.

By Sorcha Clifford