Guest guest Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 " National Health Federation " <thenhf Did You Fall for the 12/31/09 Codex Scam? " Bettym19 " <Bettym19 NHF Logo PRESS RELEASE DECEMBER 31, 2009 – WHERE WERE YOU WHEN THE EARTH ENDED? January 4, 2010 Many of you kept hearing the message for these many months now, “Codex is coming into effect as of December 31, 2009.” Depending on the source, the message either stated directly or implied that your dietary supplements were in danger after that date. And how many of you fell for that false siren cry? Be honest. Raise your hand if you did, and many will, because that false cry of alarm was circulated on the internet for so long by persons who should have known better, who still hold themselves out as “experts” on Codex, and who constantly tap you for donations so that their “expertise” and “important messages” can be spread far and wide. What expertise? What important messages? It’s nonsense; and too many people fell for and bought that nonsense hook, line, and sinker. And are still believing it even now! Listen! Well, December 31, 2009 has come and gone and there is no enactment of Codex “regulations” on dietary supplements into law in the United States. Yes, the European Union’s Food Supplements Directive has come into full effect; but that is a far different beast, not to be confused as so many have with Codex Alimentarius. Is Codex Alimentarius, as its standards are currently being developed, a danger? Absolutely. But were the Codex Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplement Guidelines going to be made into “law” as of December 31st? Absolutely not. And we at the National Health Federation, the only health-freedom organization accredited by Codex to attend and speak out at its meetings, have told you for a very long time now that December 31, 2009, was not a Codex threat date. The truth is it never was. Fool Me Once, Shame on You Fool Me Twice, Shame oon Me Those people who misinformed you all these months are the same ones who almost five years ago also claimed that Codex would eliminate vitamins and minerals from American health-food store shelves by July 31, 2005. Well, that date also came and went without that happening. Now they have a larger audience and one that is ignorant of these earlier false claims. How many more false cries will have to come and go before people wake up to the fact that they should stop listening to anyone who claimed that December 31st was a Codex danger date? How much more time must pass before that audience realizes that they have been suckers, steered in a wrong direction and with a false message? Now, these same Codex “experts” are pretending that somehow the date was “pushed back.” “Whew,” they say, now it will be later. Last November, if not before, they must have seen this December 31st date coming up hard and fast on them and wondered how they could possibly wiggle out of it. How to explain, then, to their sucker audience when that date arrived that December 31st was no longer a “danger” (since it never had been in the beginning)? That’s it, yes, “Push Back.” The date was “pushed back.” How simple. How neat. And how absolutely false. The Only Freedom Force at Codex The only health-freedom organization that has any standing whatsoever at the Codex Alimentarius meetings is the National Health Federation. We are the only such ones who can speak out at Codex meetings, submit documents for delegates’ review, and interact in real-time with the other delegates as the meeting discussions are happening. Even if you consider those who attend Codex meetings as voiceless, passive observers, the NHF has still attended more Codex meetings than all other health-freedom organizations combined. So, we not only have actual participatory experience, but we have more experience in general. Plus, we don’t feed you a load of horse manure, unnecessarily alarming you, just so we will look good. We tell you the truth. Realize, the way Codex works is that they do not really listen to anyone outside of the Codex process. That’s why the only ones who can make a difference at the Codex levels are those on the inside, such as the NHF. That is exactly how, at the last Codex Committee meeting in Germany, NHF was able to stop a very anti-health document setting absurdly-low Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) from advancing. Without NHF, this document would have advanced forward towards completion. Get off the Sucker Train So, where were you when the Earth “ended” last New Year’s Eve? On the sucker train? And are you still on it? Do you still actually believe that the Codex Food Supplements standards became law on or the day after that date? The Tooth Fairy is more real than that nonsense, at least a child can get some money for a tooth. With the other, you just get a red face. If you want the real information on what is happening at Codex, visit our NHF website at <http://www.thenhf.com/codex.html>www.thenhf.com/codex.html. Better yet, make a donation to keep us fighting for you in the trenches at the Codex meetings. We need your help, here and now - you help no one if you waste your time, money, and energy by chasing ghosts and worrying about phantom regulatory deadlines. <https://www.thenhf.com/simple_donations.htm>Donate here and help us fight for your health freedom. The real health-freedom heroes are all of those NHF Members and other supporters who did not fall for the 12/31/09 Codex joke and kept supporting us through thick and thin in the real fight. Will you be part of the solution? Or will you be part of the diversion? Please start right now to be part of the solution by sending this e-mail on to everyone you know who would be interested in knowing the truth. And help put an end to the misinformation about 12/31/09. ******************** For further information on Codex, please visit the NHF website (Codex): <http://www.thenhf.com/codex.html>http://www.thenhf.com/codex.html NHF Codex Book - <https://www.thenhf.com/codex/buy_codex_book.html> NHF Codex Overview (May be used as an article or printed as a handout to educate on Codex) - <http://www.thenhf.com/codex/codex_handout.pdf> NHF-UK Codex Overview (May be used as an article or printed as a handout to educate on Codex) - <http://www.thenhf.com/codex/codex_handout_uk.pdf> ******************** As the oldest and best-respected health-freedom group on Capitol Hill, the NHF continues to be the credible source of objective assessment of, and proactive actions on, Congressional legislation and FDA matters that have material impact upon our freedom-of-health choices and access to dietary supplements and nutritional foods. ******************** <http://www.thenhf.com/press_releases/pr_04_jan_2010.html>Click here for the permanent link to this press release, use this link to inform others. National Health Federation: Established in 1955, the National Health Federation is a consumer-education, health-freedom organization working to protect individuals' rights to choose to consume healthy food, take supplements and use alternative therapies without unnecessary government restrictions. The NHF is the only such organization with recognized observer-delegate status at Codex meetings. <http://www.thenhf.com>www.thenhf.com ************************************** If you would like to be removed from this mailing list, <contact-us?subject=Opt Out & body=Opt Out> P.O. Box 688, Monrovia, CA 91017 USA ~ 1 (626) 357-2181 ~ Fax 1 (626) 303-0642 Website: <http://www.thenhf.com>www.thenhf.com E-mail: <contact-uscontact-us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 Just a few precisions and some questions.First, I couldn't agree more with Betty's post.Where the 12/31/09 latest Codex panic came from was this video:http://www.wearechange.org/2009/12/codex-alimentarius-goes-into-effect-dec.htmlPOSTED: SATURDAY, DECEMBER 26, 2009Codex Alimentarius, goes into effect Dec. 31st 2009[5 1/2 mn. video]w/ Rima Laibow saying [on July 29, 2008, though...] "it goes into global implementation on Dec. 31st 2009" ---------There's no doubt indeed that the NHF was *quite* instrumental in sparing us from the implementation of Codex so far. BRAVO to them! See again [i sent them out wildly at the time]http://snipurl.com/t4sz6 [One Click]VICTORY AT CODEX!!! Anti-Supplement NRV Document Held Back Because of NHFNovember 6, 2009>>The CCNFSDU was all prepared to rubber-stamp its approval on the “Proposed Draft Additional or Revised Nutrient Reference Values for Labelling Purposes in the Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling,” which had been pushed by the delegation of the Republic of Korea and others.lThis document was so astoundingly anti-vitamin and mineral it infuriated the NHF representative, who had to restrain himself from using harsh and insulting words when it came NHF’s turn to speak. Appendix 2 of the document is only two pages, but contains already-low values for each of the Vitamins and Minerals listed in the Appendix (except for Fluoride, which of course has an excessively high value). To see the document, go HERE.For example, the “scientific” values assigned to Vitamin C were being reduced from an already-low 60 milligrams to an even-lower 45 milligrams! The NRV for magnesium was to be cut from 300 milligrams to 240 milligrams. Niacin’s value was to be chopped from 18 milligrams to 15. These were, and are, absurd numbers, based upon nutritional ignorance.Over a one-hour period, the NHF took the floor repeatedly to lambast the document and to insist that its adoption would be a public-relations nightmare and make Codex the laughingstock of the World. If anything, NHF said, these numbers must be drastically raised. The argument swirled around the room with the NHF holding firm against comments from many other country delegations, especially Australia (which calls harsher standards "an extra bit of comfort"), all of whom thought that these numbers were perfectly normal! Had NHF not challenged the document, there would have been no sustained opposition to its passage.Instead, NHF kept unrelentingly hammering at the points it had first raised and answered at every chance the counter-arguments of the document’s proponents. Finally, the Chairman, perhaps in exasperation, suggested that the Committee not advance the document to its next step because there was no consensus! This “compromise” was supported by NHF but opposed by others until, with it still hanging in the balance, the Indian delegation firmly stated its support for NHF’s position and against it advancing. India’s timing was impeccable. That was enough for the Chairman, who quickly concluded the debate and held the document back.<<----------http://snipurl.com/tcx6p [One Click]S.510 Food Safety - Partial But Important Victory [a Press Release from the NHF]>>The modified bill language – with clear statements of Congressional intent on the non-application of Codex standards to supplements – is an important step forward. The Bill Report should provide further protection against the FDA's continued Codex dietary supplement interpretive freelancing, especially with inclusion of the FDA/Codex regulatory-fix language.<<>>Specifically, Senator Harkin said, "Codex has no jurisdiction over the regulation of the manufacture and sale of supplements in the United States."<<----------This said, certainly not to belittle the NHF victory, it's only temporary and Codex has only been "held back" indeed. The EU is fierce in promoting Codex [and I hear, for instance, that they want homeopathic remedies classified as "drugs," thus regulated by Codex, which would be the end of homeopathy as we know it]. So, here's my question: what would be the impact of the NHF opposition on the application of Codex on Europe? And if Europe starts implementing it, won't our supplements from --and to-- Europe [and, for instance, homeopathic remedies, mostly imported from France] be regulated by the way of world trade organizations?Subsequent question: when is this Codex Committee due to reconvene?I'm glad for the NHF, I can't congratulate them enough, but there's a lot more fighting on the horizon and I'll be happy to hear what you have to say about it!Viviane =====In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.