Fwd: H1N1 as an abortifacient....attached Public Service Announcement: Please help us...easy...send to your local radio

[Guest guest]

>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:48:19 -0500

>H1N1 as an abortifacient....attached Public Service Announcement:

> Please help us...easy...send to your local radio

> Dannemann <ncowmail

>Diana Page <dianapage

>

>Grassroots data collecting. If the government won't do it, we will!!!!

>

>We need your help to submit the attached Public

>Service Announcement (PSA) to your local radio

>and TV station, please, and perhaps your local

>newspaper or favorite internet site. You can

>find our updating list of miscarriage cases on

><http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/H1N1-RELATED%20miscarriages.htm>http://w\

ww.progressiveconvergence.com/H1N1-RELATED%20miscarriages.htm

>

>

>Our understanding is that the FCC requires radio

>and TV station to do public service announcements for non profits for free.

>

>Getting this to your local radio and TV station

>or community newspaper could take you no more

>than an hour on the Internet as many radio and

>TV stations have " forms " . Simply copy and enter

>the PSA in the email. Or a phone call might be

>appropriate in cases where there is no Internet

>form. Multiply yourself and please send this

>request through your networks, like facebook or twitter.

>

>

>You help will enable us to collect data on H1N1

>related miscarriages whereas the government is

>failing to collect these fatal adverse

>events and continues therefore to call the H1N1 safe.

>

>

>H1N1 as a suspect abortifacient.

>

>List of miscarriage taken from blogs and VAERS data bank.

>

><http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/H1N1-RELATED%20miscarriages.htm>http://w\

ww.progressiveconvergence.com/H1N1-RELATED%20miscarriages.htm

>

>We are up against media such as this.

>

>

>Clive Thompson is a contributing writer for the

>New York Times Magazine and Wired. Clive has

>some trip going. Wired also lost readers for their pro vaccine articles.

>

>Washington Post. Dribble, dribble,

>nonsense.....but...sounds like we are being effective.

>I guess he hasn't heard of all the women

>miscarrying after the H1N1 that we are

>collecting. Especially since Doctors are not

>reporting them to VAERS Data bank. So from

>their point of view the vaccine is SAFE!

>Fortunately we have the internet and our networks...

>

>

>---

>

>

>--- On Sun, 12/20/09, Teresa Binstock

><<binstockbinstock wrote:

>

>

>

><http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/opinions/outlook/worst-ideas/inde\

x.html>The

>Worst Ideas of the Decade

>

>

>

>

>

><http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/opinions/outlook/worst-ideas/vacc\

ines-and-autism.html>Vaccine

>scares

>

>

>

>by Clive Thompson

><http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/opinions/outlook/worst-ideas/vacc\

ines-and-autism.html>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/opinions/outlo\

ok/worst-ideas/vaccines-and-autism.html

>

>

>Why didn't the United States have enough vaccine

>to fight swine flu this fall? It's partly

>because federal health officials didn't mix

>adjuvants into the drug. Adjuvants are

>substances that boost the immune system's

>response to a vaccine, so that less vaccine is

>needed per dose. Using them could have allowed

>us to create up to four times more H1N1 vaccine

>doses than we have. Most of Europe used

>adjuvants; so did Canada. Why didn't the feds?

>They were too worried about spooking

>anti-vaccine activists, many of whom claim

>adjuvants contribute to autism. This almost

>certainly isn't true: Adjuvants have been widely

>used for years, with no reputable study

>suggesting a link between them and autism. But

>federal officials feared people would avoid the

>H1N1 vaccine if it included adjuvants. As Anne

>Schuchat of the Centers for Disease Control and

>Prevention said in congressional testimony last

>month, " The public's confidence in our vaccine

>system and in vaccines in this country [is] very, very fragile. "

>The movement blaming vaccines for causing autism

>emerged in the early 2000s, and it was one of

>the most catastrophically horrible ideas of the

>decade. Not just because it's misguided: Sure,

>study after study has found no solid link

>between autism and many alleged vaccine-based

>culprits, ranging from adjuvants to thimoserol,

>a mercury-based preservative. The bigger problem

>is how uniquely powerful the anti-vaccine

>contingent has become - and how it has begun to

>deform both public policy and everyday behavior.

>Immunization used to be regarded as one of

>modern society's greatest achievements; before

>smallpox vaccines, the disease routinely

>accounted for 10 percent of all deaths in

>Europe. But amazingly, we're now moving back to

>the dark ages. The number of children showing up

>at school in California without routine shots

>has doubled since 1997, according to an analysis

>by the Los Angeles Times. If enough people stop

>vaccinating their children, we will lose " herd

>immunity " - the ability of a society to

>collectively resist a disease. (You typically

>need something like 85 percent of a population

>immunized to keep the nastiest communicable diseases from circulating.)

>It's impossible to tell how many swine-flu

>deaths were caused by the deficit of vaccine,

>but the numbers are serious: According to the

>CDC, about 10,000 people had died from the

>disease by the middle of last month, 1,090 of them children.

>The subtler but more insidious effect of the

>vaccine-autism movement is philosophical. The

>anti-vaccine folks have whipped up anti-science

>sentiment by painting scientists as corrupt

>elitists on the take from Big Pharma, cackling

>sadistically as they force us to get shots. This

>paranoia flows equally from woo-woo Hollywood

>liberals and the anti-government right; few

>other subjects can unite Jenny McCarthy and Jim

>Carrey with Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh.

>Of course, the only hope we have of treating

>autism and, God willing, preventing it comes

>from careful, rigorous science - the same

>process that created vaccines, eradicated polio

>and smallpox, and saved millions of lives. For

>the anti-vaccine crowd, that's an irony that ought to prick.

>Clive Thompson is a contributing writer for the

>New York Times Magazine and Wired.

>

>

>

>

>.

>

>--

>You received this message because you are

>d to the Google Groups " Vaccine Dangers Activists " group.

>To post to this group, send email to

><VaxActivists (AT) googl (DOT) com>VaxActivists (AT) googl (DOT) com.

>