Fwd: Forced Vaccinations, Government and the Public Interest, Russell Blaylock, M.D. National Health Federation

[Guest guest]

>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:38:18 -0500

>bettym19

> " Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum. " <bettym19

>Forced Vaccinations, Government and the Public Interest,

> Russell Blaylock, M.D. National Health Federation

>

>http://www.thenhf.com/vaccinations/vac_299.htm

><http://www.thenhf.com/>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>Forced Vaccinations, Government, and the Public Interest

>

>By Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D.

>December 2009

>

>

>

>

>

>Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous

>trend in the United States, as well as

>worldwide, and that is the resorting of various

>governments at different levels to mandating

>forced vaccination upon the public at large. My

>State of Mississippi has one of the

>most-restrictive vaccine-exemption laws in the

>United States, where exemptions are allowed only

>upon medical recommendation. Ironically, this is

>only on paper, as many have had as many as three

>physicians, some experts in neurological damage

>caused by vaccines, provide written calls for

>exemption, only to be turned down by the State’s public-health officer.

>

>Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New

>Jersey and Maryland, where forced vaccinations

>have either been mandated by the courts, the

>state legislature, or have such legislation

>pending. All of such policies strongly resemble

>those policies found in National Socialist

>empires, Stalinist countries, or Communist China.

>

>When public-health officers are asked for the

>legal justification for such draconian measures

>as forcing people to accept vaccines that they

>deem either a clear and present danger to

>themselves and their loved ones or have had

>personal experience with serious adverse

>reactions to such vaccines, they usually resort

>to the need to protect the public.

>

>One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are

>as effective as being touted by the

>public-health officials, then why should one

>fear the unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated

>would have at least 95% protection. This

>question puts them in a very difficult position.

>Their usual response is that a “small”

>percentage of the vaccinated will not have

>sufficient protection and would still be at

>risk. Now, if they admit what the literature

>shows, that vaccine failure rates are much

>higher than the 5% they claim, they must face

>the next obvious question ­ then why should

>anyone take the vaccine if there is a significant chance it will not protect?

>

>When pressed further, they then resort to their

>favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the

>vaccine proponents ­ herd immunity. This concept

>is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now

>say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated

>to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing

>vaccination grows progressively. I pondered this

>question for some time before the answer hit me.

>Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only

>to natural immunity ­ that is, contracting the infection itself.

>

>Is Herd Immunity Real?

>

>In the original description of herd immunity,

>the protection to the population at large

>occurred only if people contracted the

>infections naturally. The reason for this is

>that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a

>lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched

>onto this concept and applied it to

>vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one

>major problem ­ vaccine-induced immunity lasted

>for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10

>years at most, and then this applies only to

>humoral immunity. This is why they began,

>silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines,

>even the common childhood infections such as

>chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

>

>Then they discovered an even greater problem,

>the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or

>less. This is why we are now seeing mandates

>that youth entering colleges have multiple

>vaccines, even those which they insisted gave

>lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is

>being suggested for full-grown adults.

>Ironically, no one in the media or medical field

>is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

>

>That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly

>myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in

>medical school, we were taught that all of the

>childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This

>thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not

>until relatively recently that it was discovered

>that most of these vaccines lost their

>effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given.

>What this means is that at least half the

>population, that is the baby boomers, have had

>no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these

>diseases for which they had been vaccinated very

>early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more

>of the population was unprotected for decades.

>

>If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all

>at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should

>the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we

>have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with

>50% or less of the population having vaccine

>protection. That is, herd immunity has not

>existed in this country for many decades and no

>resurgent epidemics have occurred.

>Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to

>frighten doctors, public-health officials, other

>medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

>

>When we examine the scientific literature, we

>find that for many of the vaccines protective

>immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60%

>of the public has been without vaccine

>protection. Again, this would mean that with a

>30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined

>with the fact that most people lost their immune

>protection within 2 to 10 year of being

>vaccinated, most of us were without the magical

>95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why

>vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.

>

>Without the mantra of herd immunity, these

>public-health officials would not be able to

>justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually give

>the physicians who question my statement that

>herd immunity is a myth a simple example. When I

>was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it

>was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last a

>lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been

>mandated, we discovered that its protection

>lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask my

>doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a

>case of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them

>to look at the yearly data on tetanus infections

>­ one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same

>can be said for measles, mumps, and other

>childhood infections. It was, and still is, all a myth.

>

>The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest

>upon this myth and it is important that we

>demonstrate the falsity of this idea. Neil Z.

>Miller, in his latest book The Vaccine

>Information Manual, provides compelling evidence that herd immunity is a myth.

>

>The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

>

>Those pushing mandatory vaccination for an

>ever-growing list of diseases are a mixed bag.

>Some are quite sincere and truly want to improve

>the health of the United States. They believe

>the vaccine-induced herd immunity myth and

>likewise believe that vaccines are basically

>effective and safe. These are not the evil people.

>

>A growing number are made of those with a

>collectivist worldview and see themselves as a

>core of elite wise men and women who should tell

>the rest of us what we should do in all aspects

>of our lives. They see us as ignorant cattle,

>who are unable to understand the virtues of

>their plan for America and the World. Like

>children, we must be made to take our medicine ­

>since, in their view, we have no concept of the

>true benefit of the bad-tasting medicine we are to be fed.

>

>I have also found that a small number of people

>in the regulatory agencies and public health

>departments would like to speak out but are so

>intimidated and threatened with dismissal or

>destruction of their careers, that they remain

>silent. As for the media, they are absolutely clueless.

>

>I have found that “reporters” (we have few real

>journalists these days) rarely understand what

>they are reporting on and always trust and rely

>upon people in positions of official power, even

>if those people are unqualified to speak on the

>subject. Most of the time they run to the

>Centers for Disease Control or medical

>university to seek answers. I cannot count the

>number of times I have seen university

>department heads interviewed when it was obvious

>they had no clue as to the subject being

>discussed. Few such professors will pass up an

>opportunity to appear on camera or be quoted in a newspaper.

>

>One must also appreciate that such reporters and

>editors are under an enormous economic strain,

>as vaccine manufacturers are major advertisers

>in all media outlets and for an obvious reason ­

>it controls content. A number of excellent

>stories on such medical subjects are spiked

>every day. That means we will always be

>relegated to the “fringe media” as our media

>outlets are called. Despite the high quality of

>the journalism in many of the “fringe” outlets,

>they have a much smaller audience. And despite

>this we are having an enormous effect on the debate.

>

>As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate

>

>John Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning,

>observed that as the British collectivists began

>to see opposition rise to their grandiose plans,

>they became more desperate and aggressive in

>their reaction. They then initiated a campaign

>of smearing their opponents and blaming every

>failure on the unwillingness of the people to

>accept the planner’s dictates without question.

>We certainly have seen this in this debate

>­opponents to forced vaccinations are referred

>to as fringe scientists, kooks, uneducated,

>confused, and enemies of public safety ­

>reminiscent of Stalin’s favorite phrase, “enemy of the people.”

>

>This desperation is based upon their fear that

>the public might soon catch on to the fact that

>the entire vaccine program is based upon

>nonsense, fear, and concocted fairy tales. One

>special fear of theirs is that the public might

>discover the fact that most vaccines are

>contaminated with a number of known and

>yet-to-be discovered viruses, bacteria, viral

>fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments. And, further,

>that our science demonstrates that these

>contaminants could lead to a number of

>slowly-developing degenerative diseases,

>including degenerative diseases of the brain.

>This is rarely discussed but is of major importance in this debate.

>

>The idea that adults and their children would be

>forced to submit to being injected with dozens

>of these organisms and organic fragments is

>terrifying. No regulatory agency is tracking to

>see if chronic diseases are rising in the

>vaccinated, yet we have compelling evidence of a

>massive rise in all autoimmune diseases,

>neurodegenerative diseases, and certain cancers

>since the advent of a dramatic increase in the

>number of vaccines being mandated.

>

>Of special concern is the finding that many of

>the contaminant organisms can pass from

>generation to generation. For example, new

>studies have found that SV-40, a major

>contaminant of the polio vaccine until 1963, not

>only existed as a latent virus for the lifetime

>of those exposed to the vaccine but was being

>passed on to the next generation, primarily by

>way of sperm, something called vertical

>transmission. This means that every generation

>from now on will be infected with this known

>carcinogenic virus. There is also compelling

>evidence that some polio vaccines manufactured

>after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus.

>

>What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of

>such concern is its association with so many

>cancers ­ including mesothelioma,

>medulloblastoma, ependymoma, meningioma,

>astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, pituitary

>adenoma, glioblastoma, osteosarcomas,

>non-Hodgkins lymphoma, papillary thyroid

>carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.

>

>The Federal government has gone to enormous

>links to cover up this association, despite the

>powerful scientific evidence that this vaccine

>infected at least a hundred million people

>worldwide with this carcinogenic virus. And, it

>took over 40 years just to get this far. Linking

>vaccine contaminations and immunoexcitotoxicity

>to the drastic rise in neurodegenerative

>diseases will probably take even longer because

>of the widespread growth of entrenched powers

>high in government and their control of the

>media, which is equally extensive. The fact that

>powerful, enormously wealthy foundations, such

>as the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates

>Foundation, and Rockefeller series of

>foundations, are supporting forced vaccination

>greatly enhances the power of governments all over the World.

>

>These foundations operate in the shadows,

>influencing legislation and government actions

>through the World Health Organization and

>individual governmental bodies. Behind every

>call for forced vaccinations, mandated

>quarantines, and home invasions, one can find

>one of these foundations providing the money as

>well as experts. Remember, the largest of the

>pharmaceutical-vaccine manufacturers are also

>providing much of the money for the foundations

>and serving on the boards of these foundations.

>The Rockefellers either owned outright or had

>controlling interest in all of the major

>pharmaceutical companies. This has given them

>absolute and extremely powerful access to the

>reins of power at all levels. Yet, they can be defeated by the truth.

>

>Dr. Blaylock is a board-certified neurosurgeon,

>author and lecturer. He attended the LSU School

>of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana and

>completed his internship and neurosurgical

>residency at the Medical University of South

>Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. For the

>past 24 years he has practiced neurosurgery in

>addition to having a nutritional practice for 2

>years. Retiring from his neurosurgical practice

>to devote full time to nutritional studies and

>research, Dr. Blaylock has written and

>illustrated three books (Excitotoxins: The Taste

>That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That

>Can Save Your Life, and Natural Strategies for

>The Cancer Patient). In addition, he has written

>and illustrated three chapters in medical

>textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional

>protection against biological terrorism, has an

>e-booklet on radioprotection (Nuclear Sunrise),

>written and illustrated a booklet on multiple

>sclerosis, and written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals.

>

>Other credits include Dr. Blaylock's DVD

>Nutrition & Behavior, a CD-ROM on the Truth

>About Aspartame, and, for the past five years, a

>health newsletter The Blaylock Wellness Report,

>published by NewsMax. Since the publication of

>his first book, he has been a guest on over 100

>syndicated radio and television programs and

>appeared on the 700 Club seven times. He

>lectures widely to both lay and professional

>medical audiences on a variety of nutritional subjects.

>

>Dr. Blaylock is a visiting professor of biology

>at Belhaven College and serves on the editorial

>staff of the Journal of the American

>Nutraceutical Association, the editorial staff

>of the Fluoride Journal and is on the editorial

>staff of the Journal of American Physicians and

>Surgeons, official journal of the Association of

>American Physicians and Surgeons. He is also a

>regular lecturer for the Fellowship for Anti-aging and Regenerative Medicine.

>

>http://www.mpwhi.com/blaylock_wellness_center.htm

>and http://russellblaylockmd.com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>