Guest guest Posted December 4, 2009 Report Share Posted December 4, 2009 > " Namaste Publishing " <info > " Namaste Publishing " <info ><Undisclosed-Recipient:;> >At midnight last night, the United >Kingdom ceased to be a sovereign state >Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:29:22 -0000 > >War has been declared on the people of Britain. >This is TREASON - the writing has been on the >wall for some time. The UK now ceases to exist >in the eyes of " Europiles " (deliberate mistake >get the suppositories ready) - traitors in our >parliament... including titular heads who have >been determined to bring this to fruition and >thus have betrayed the people of these Isles. >Are you prepared to relinquish your heritage, >your inalienable rights as fought for by your ancestors? >Read here " Royal Assent given to the Treaty of >Lisbon " ><http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2008/06/royal-assent-of-treaty-of-lisbo\ n.html>http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2008/06/royal-assent-of-treaty-of-\ lisbon.html > >At midnight last night, the United Kingdom ceased to be a sovereign state ><http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100018459/at-midnight-last-nigh\ t-the-united-kingdom-ceased-to-be-a-sovereign-state/>http://blogs.telegraph.co.u\ k/news/danielhannan/100018459/at-midnight-last-night-the-united-kingdom-ceased-t\ o-be-a-sovereign-state/ > > >We woke up in a different country today. >Alright, it doesn’t look very different. The >trees still seem black against the winter sun; >the motorways continue to jam inexplicably; >commuters carry on avoiding eye contact. But >Britain is no longer a sovereign nation. At >midnight last night, we ceased to be an >independent state, bound by international >treaties to other independent states, and became >instead a subordinate unit within a European state. > >Yes, a European state. Take a quick dekko at the >definition set out in Article One of the1933 >Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties >of States: “The state as a person of >international law should possess the following >qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) >a defined territory; © government; and (d) >capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” > >Until yesterday, the EU qualified on grounds >(a), (b) and ©. Now it has ticked the final >box. Under the Lisbon Treaty, which came into >force today, it acquires “legal personality”, >which gives it the right to sign accords and >treat with other states. Nor is this right >simply theoretical: the EU now has a foreign >minister, a diplomatic corps (the European >External Action Service) and 160 overseas embassies. > >Until yesterday, the EU could not annex >additional policy areas without a new treaty, >which needed to be ratified by all its >constituent nations. Now, it has the so-called >“passerelle” clause, or self-amending mechanism. >Parliament, in other words, no longer has the >final say on extensions of EU jurisdiction. The >EU derives its authority, not from its 27 >members, but from its own foundational texts. > >Until yesterday, Britain could simply walk out >of the EU by abrogating the Treaty of Rome and >repealing the 1972 European Communities Act. >Henceforth, it will have to go through the >secession procedure laid down in Lisbon. In >other words – in the minds of Euro-lawyers, at >any rate, if not of British constitutionalists – >the EU gets to settle the terms on which its >members are allowed to leave. Formal sovereignty >has been shifted from the national capitals to Brussels. > >It is appalling, demeaning, disgraceful that >such a thing should have been done without >popular consent, and in the absence of the >referendum that all three parties had promised. >“There’s no point in crying over spilt milk,” >you might say. True. But there is every point in mopping it up. > >We woke up in a different country today. >Alright, it doesn’t look very different. The >trees still seem black against the winter sun; >the motorways continue to jam inexplicably; >commuters carry on avoiding eye contact. But >Britain is no longer a sovereign nation. At >midnight last night, we ceased to be an >independent state, bound by international >treaties to other independent states, and became >instead a subordinate unit within a European state. > >Yes, a European state. Take a quick dekko at the >definition set out in Article One of the1933 >Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties >of States: “The state as a person of >international law should possess the following >qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) >a defined territory; © government; and (d) >capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” > >Until yesterday, the EU qualified on grounds >(a), (b) and ©. Now it has ticked the final >box. Under the Lisbon Treaty, which came into >force today, it acquires “legal personality”, >which gives it the right to sign accords and >treat with other states. Nor is this right >simply theoretical: the EU now has a foreign >minister, a diplomatic corps (the European >External Action Service) and 160 overseas embassies. > >Until yesterday, the EU could not annex >additional policy areas without a new treaty, >which needed to be ratified by all its >constituent nations. Now, it has the so-called >“passerelle” clause, or self-amending mechanism. >Parliament, in other words, no longer has the >final say on extensions of EU jurisdiction. The >EU derives its authority, not from its 27 >members, but from its own foundational texts. > >Until yesterday, Britain could simply walk out >of the EU by abrogating the Treaty of Rome and >repealing the 1972 European Communities Act. >Henceforth, it will have to go through the >secession procedure laid down in Lisbon. In >other words – in the minds of Euro-lawyers, at >any rate, if not of British constitutionalists – >the EU gets to settle the terms on which its >members are allowed to leave. Formal sovereignty >has been shifted from the national capitals to Brussels. > >It is appalling, demeaning, disgraceful that >such a thing should have been done without >popular consent, and in the absence of the >referendum that all three parties had promised. >“There’s no point in crying over spilt milk,” >you might say. True. But there is every point in mopping it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.