Japan: New Alias For Two Killers

[Guest guest]

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:29:04 -0500

bettym19

" Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum. " <bettym19

Japan: New Alias For Two Killers

 

 

Japan: NEW ALIAS FOR TWO KILLERS

 

GMO Food Additives to be Introduced Without Full Safety Appraisal

reads the announcement, but you'll have to read it 3 times to figure

out what it says, which is essentially: Untested poisons being

released by Ajinomoto.

 

They proclaim that food additives MSG and aspartame have been

judged to be safe by the Expert Committee for Genetically Modified Foods.

 

 

Who judged the Expert Committee to be valid, and WHO PAYS THEM?

 

If GM foods need approval, then aspartame, which is produced by a

genetically modified process, has never been proven to be safe from

the GM standpoint, and has been used for decades without GM approval.

In fact, aspartame itself has never been proven to be safe.

 

The FDA Board of Inquiry revoked the petition for approval awaiting

the signature of FDA Commissioner, Dr. Jere Goyan. FDA had tried to

have the manufacturer, G. D. Searle, indicted for fraud. Both US

Prosecutors hired on with the defense team and the statute of

limitations expired.

 

The mighty Don Rumsfeld, then CEO of the aspartame producer, G. D.

Searle applied his Illinois style (Think grafting Governor

Blagojevich) political muscle to put aspartame on the market. He was

on Reagan's transition team. At 3AM of the night after Ronald

Reagan's inauguration stalwart FDA Commissioner Dr. Jere Goyan was

fired and Arthur Hayes was appointed the new FDA

Commissioner. . Reagan wrote an executive order making the FDA

powerless to do anything on aspartame until he got Hayes

there. Hayes then sprinkled holy water on aspartame after which time

he got a sweet job in the aspartame biz.

 

 

Dr. Bill Deagle blew the whistle on how aspartame is genetically

engineered. He said:

 

Most people when asked how Aspartame is made do not have the first

step of understanding. While an E.R. doctor and primary care

physician in Augusta, GA in 1987 and 1988, I was told a number of

interesting facts about the adjacent Aspartame factory. Bacteria with

genes inserted generate a sludge which is centrifuged to remove the

aspartame and many hundreds of contaminant organic and amino acids

are present. We were told not to report illness or worker's

compensation issues for fear of being fired by the hospital, now the

Augusta Regional Medical Center. Many of their employees presented

with psychiatric, neuropathy conditions, chronic fatigue and organic

cases of loss of cognitive function. This powder from the dried

sludge was then transported for packaging in factories elsewhere in

the US, before sale as Equal and now the myriad of names of this neurotoxin. "

 

 

So over two decades ago aspartame was being genetically

engineered. Not only is aspartame genetically engineered, but FDA

knew it was used as a placebo in pharma studies before it was

approved. That's illegal because placebos are suppose to be

inert. This deceit made MSG appear harmless. Both chemicals,

monosodium glutamate and aspartame, are excitotoxic and produce the

identical pathologic reactions. So the manufacturer could report to

FDA that MSG is safe as the placebo. That's a con mans game, one bad

check for another! Neurosurgen Russell Blaylock, M.D. detailed the

mutual toxicity of those chemicals in his book " Excitotoxins: The

Taste That Kills " .

 

Jack Samuels, Truth In Labeling Campaign President, reviewed FDA

records of a study about amino acid supplements and found a 3/22/91

letter from Andrew G. Ebert, PhD, Chairman, International Glutamate

Technical Committee , -a glutamate industry organization-in which

Ebert admitted that aspartame had been used since at least l978 in

test and placebo materials that his organization provided to

scientists who study the safety of MSG.

 

Some subjects reacted to both MSG and the placebo, so the researchers

concluded MSG is just as safe as the placebo and any reactions had

nothing to do with MSG. The reactions were ignored, and MSG got a pass.

 

If you compared arsenic to strychnine you could decide theyre equally

safe. Just ignore the dead bodies! After Jack Samuels publicized

this fraud the Federation of American Societies for Experimental

Biology in its July 1993 report on the safety of MSG in food,

concluded that aspartame, as a placebo is inappropriate.

 

With this admission that aspartame was used as the placebo in MSG

studies since 1978, all studies showing the safety of MSG because of

this can no longer be considered valid, and should be thrown out. Any

future studies should be done by independent scientists since fraud

has been established. Furthermore, aspartame was not approved

until 1981 so if you put this in prospective, they are guilty of

using a product without FDA approval, but with their

knowledge. Even at the time this was found FDA did nothing and made

no issue of it so it could be swept under the table, and hopefully

forgotten. Not even a slap on the wrist. Is this practice continuing?

 

 

Since aspartame was marketed the FDA lets aspartame makers do what

they want. This is the same FDA that once asked the Department of

Justice to prosecute the NutraSweet manufacture for submitting

fraudulent tests, The article below reveals:

 

" That was why the Food Safety Commission has published a Directive

for safety assessment of food additives which are produced using

genetically modified micro-organisms and which are highly refined and

have non-protein characteristics, including amino acids . and which

are produced using genetically modified micro--organisms " .

 

Ajinomoto will never reveal how they brew the witches potion; if they

did you'd avoid it like the plague!

 

 

Its now known planet wide how deadly aspartame is, and

the manufacturers know their days are numbered, so Ajinomoto has

written they will change the name of aspartame to AminoSweet. Think A

MEAN SWEET. MSG's bad name is also now concealed under descriptions

like hydrolyzed vegetable protein, yeast, malt flavoring, yeast

extract, textured protein, etc.

 

They invent multiple ways to deceive. Stuart Pape, head of the

National Yogurt Assn, petitioned the FDA to allow aspartame,

unlabeled, in yogurt and dairy products. This is clearly against the

law, which requires a PKU warning to protect phenylketonurics from

the possibly fatal reactions they experience from phenylalanine, 50%

of aspartame. The dishonorable Pape once headed the National Soft

Drink Assn. Read their powerful protest against aspartame in the 1985

Congressional Record. Later the soda pop makers actually lobbied for

the poison. http://www.mpwhi.com/open_letter_dick_adamson.htm

 

 

As to the labeling issue, the article discusses Tryptophan. An

informant told me the reason the 38 people died was that the product

was marketed by a chemical company who genetically engineered the

product and it was chock full of excitotoxins. Had it been labeled

genetically engineered no health food store would have bought the

product and those victims would probably still be alive. The whole

point of this issue is that the manufacturers know if something is

labeled GM the public wont buy it. Since the population at large

fights against genetically engineered foods and don't want anything

to do with them, the only resource of the manufacturer is to use

their influence with government agencies to make sure their product

is not labeled to keep the public in the dark. Otherwise, they

couldn't sell their potion.

In 1999 I faxed to the Independent in the UK the formula on aspartame

from the Miwon web site. After being exposed the page came down but

I had already printed it out and it clearly showed the bacteria

genetically engineered. It was not only published on the front page

of the Independent but over the Royal Wedding.

http://www.wnho.net/gmbacteria.htm

 

 

Monsanto came up with this excuse: " A Monsanto spokeswoman

confirmed that aspartame for the US market is often made using

genetic engineering. But sweetener supplied to British food producers

is not. However, consumer groups say it is likely that some

low-calorie products containing genetically engineered aspartame have

been imported into Britain. "

 

 

Here is an excellent article on aspartame and its isolates:

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_brain_damage.htm

 

The following article details how MSG and Aspartame will be labeled:

 

 

" In the current food-labeling legislation, the former would be

labeled only as " amino acid and others " and would be used as a food

additive in many foods. The latter would be labeled only as

aspartame, which is classified as an artificial sweetener. None of

these will need to be labeled as GMO or otherwise identified as

genetically modified under the current rules. "

 

When a criminal changes names to hide his identity its called an

alias. Now you get the picture! The aspartame industry should

remember the words of Mohammed Ali, You can run but you cant hide.

 

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net

Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.co/aspartame

 

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:11:23 New

GMO Food Additives To Be Introduced Without Full Safety Appraisal

swfoxy

 

from: http://www.nishoren.org/en/?p=551

New GMO Food Additives To Be Introduced Without Full Safety Appraisal

Labeled only as amino acid and others (Consumer's Union of Japan).

 

On September 14, 2009, two new food additives from Ajinomoto were

judged to be safe by the Expert Committee for Genetically Modified

Food and Others at the Food Safety Commission (FSC). The appraisal

was open for public comments and it seems likely that the two novel

amino acids will be approved by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and

Labour by the end of November. So far, several GMO food additives

have been approved, but they were basically used for food processing,

as in the case of enzymes like alpha amylase for improved

productivity. There have been no cases of GMO food additives that are

used directly as seasoning as is the case of amino acids. Thus, when

Ajinomoto first submitted these GMO products, there were no

established method for safety appraisal.

 

That was why the Food Safety Commission has published a Directive for

safety assessment of food additives which are produced using

genetically modified micro-organisms and which are highly refined and

have non-protein characteristics, including amino acids. (Many

studies have verified that the process of genetic engineering can

produce unpredicted toxins or allergens.)

 

The two GMO food additives FSC Expert Committee judged as safe are

L-Glutamic Acid Sodium (GLU-No. 2 strain) and Aspartame-L-Fenylalanin

PHA-No. 2 strain). In the current food-labeling legislation, the

former would be labeled only as amino acid, and others and would be used as a

food additive in many foods. The latter would be labeled only as

Aspartame which is classified as an artificial sweetener. None of

these will need to be labeled as GMO or otherwise identified as

genetically modified under the current rules. For what purpose is

genetic engineering used in the production of these chemicals?

 

In the human gut, there are a number of different bacteria, including

E Coli. These help to digest the protein we eat, be it fish or meat

or other sources, by breaking them down to amino acids, making it

possible for the body to absorb them from the intestine. At Ajinomoto

Co., Inc. they figured out how to make use of this mechanism, using

artificially cultured bacteria in large tanks. Presumably, by using

GMO bacteria, they claim they can increase the productivity of the

bacteria. However, for all of those who are thinking about food, this

latest development for the purpose of improving production cannot be

regarded as safe. Was there something wrong with the former production methods?

 

We remember the tryptophan affair when many people fell ill and some

died due to the production methods, at a time when tryptophan was

sold as a supplement. L-Tryptophan is also an amino acid that can be

produced using bacteria. This incident was caused by Showa Denko Co.

in 1988 and 1989 and most victims were Americans. 38 people died and

more than 6,000 people fell ill. The cause was identified as several

impurities, which were found only in the product made by Showa Denko.

The harmful impurities had begun to appear when genetic engineering

was introduced in the production process, and they had not been

eliminated from the final mixture. It was shown that this was

possibly the reason the final product had become so harmful to humans.

 

It is clear that consumers will be paying a high price for the lack

of thorough examination of how and why the tryptophan incident

happened. Before GMO food additives are approved, their safety must

be carefully appraised. At the moment, the Food Safety Commission has

not been able to convince us that this is the case.