Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccine

[Guest guest]

[Activist_List] Vaccines: A Bullet to the Head - Dr Sherri Tenpenny

 

 

Vaccines: A Bullet to the

Head<http://www.infowars.com/vaccines-a-bullet-to-the-head/>

*Dr Sherri Tenpenny

<http://drtenpenny.com/default.aspx>*Infowars

 

November 22, 2009

 

 

It seems people often need to experience a bullet to the head before they

will believe bullets can be deadly

 

 

 

and then they rue the day they ignored warnings about playing with loaded

guns.

[image: featured stories Vaccines: A Bullet to the Head] [image: featured

stories Vaccines: A Bullet to the Head] People ignore words of caution and

roll up their sleeves to get a flu shot.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vaccination seems to hold a similar place.

 

 

 

People ignore words of caution and roll up their sleeves to get a flu shot.

It seems they think getting a vaccine is the same as taking a multivitamin,

and equally as benign. But when serious adverse events occur, such as

Guillain-Barre paralysis, a seizure disorder or even a death, a jolt of

reality lays bare just how damaging a simple vaccine can be.

 

 

 

The stranglehold of fear, perpetrated by those in white coats and by the

medical bureaucrats in Washington DC who take their marching orders from

pharma, is working hard to choke rationally thinking adults into submission.

I get emails almost every day that say something like, I bought your DVDs

and your books but I have a question:

 

 

 

Should I get a flu shot? WHAT?@!>! My mouth drops. I have to clear my head

and find a way to say, No, you should not get the flu shot, being cautious

to keep my tone void of sarcasm. That may seem harsh, but in very turbulent

times. Soft language and hand holding until people get it is becoming

increasingly more difficult.

 

 

 

Being in the business of waking people up to the hazards of vaccines

certainly has its ups and downs. A recent up was the public policy debate

held on November 10 at the University of Texas in Austin. Sponsored by the

Libertarian Longhorns, the Texas College Republicans and a few other Texas

health freedom groups, the discussion called, Are Vaccine Mandates Good or

Bad for Public Health? was open to the general public.

 

 

 

Interest in this timely topic was reflected by the standing-room only

attendance of the meeting.

 

 

 

Speaking in support of vaccination and school mandates was Tom Betz, MD,

MPH, Director of Region 7 for the Texas Department of Health Services.

Several of his health department colleagues joined him in the audience but

chose not to join him on the stage. I had the pleasure of being teamed with

Dawn Richardson, President and Co-founder of PROVE (Parents Requesting Open

Vaccine Education)

 

 

 

in Austin, Texas and the Directory of State Advocacy for the National

Vaccine Information Center in Vienna, Virginia. Our presentation was mostly

about opposition to vaccine mandates but we were able to address our

opposition to vaccines in general. Based on the hundreds of comments we

received, the debate (found all on YouTube) was well received and

enlightening for all.

 

 

 

All three participants were given the questions to review prior to the

debate. There is so much to say about vaccines that preparation was

important to cover key points, almost as sound bites; only three short

minutes were allowed for each answer. Our very professional moderator, Dr.

Donna Campbell, allowed equal time for each side.

 

 

 

During the personal introductions, Dr. Campbell informed the audience that

the plan was to have two persons on each panel;

 

 

 

but that Dr. Betz was the only person from the Health Department who would

agree to participate. Prior to settling in on the stage, I had learned the

reason why.

 

 

 

Shaking Dr. Betz hand, I thanked him for joining the discussion.

 

 

 

He returned the niceties with a slight shrug, confessing that, No one else

wanted to do it. Surprised, I queried, Why not? This is a great way to

tell everyone your message about vaccines. My unspoken question was, Why

didnt the Health Department want to jump on the opportunity to bury

anti-vaccination pseudo-science, as you call it, once and for all, in

front of everyone? He quietly replied, Weve done these types of programs

before; they never go well.

 

 

 

It seems pro-vaccine arguments are being soundly defeated, time after time.

And the real vaccine pseudo-science is being exposed for the rhetoric it

is:

 

 

 

factoids crafted by public health officials from the WHO and the CDC, and

then regurgitated by under-informed medical professionals to a na public.

Funny how medical bureaucrats and doctors are considered the experts when

it is strangely obvious they dont understand - and probably dont even read

- their own medical literature.

 

 

 

The Austin debate was the next important step in exposing that the science

of vaccination isnt so scientific after all. Vaccination has been accepted

as safe, effective and protective. The shots can be described as a medical

sacred cow, defined as a medical procedure that is unreasonably immune to

criticism. Doctors and patients who question vaccines are ridiculed and

marginalized. It is heresy to suggest that the status quo is wrong.

 

 

- A d v e r t i s e m e n t

 

 

Vaccine adverse events are considered rare, so when reactions occur, steps

are taken to negate the association to the vaccine.

 

Patients are discredited, parents are dismissed. Doctors subject very ill

persons to thousands of dollars of inconclusive medical tests, rather than

to simply acknowledge -

 

and rightfully assign causality - to the vaccine. When a person reacts to

penicillin or Paxil or any other drug, its it is blamed on the drug? Not so

with vaccines.

 

 

Going to Austin was an upbeat offset to other particularly disturbing news

reported over the last few weeks about the H1N1, swine flu vaccine:

 

 

 

** Several schools have vaccinated children without parental consent.

** The growing list of reported miscarriages.

** A teen athlete who is now crippled.

** Two students and a teacher in China who died hours after getting the

shot.

** Children having hallucinations, and then committing suicide, after

taking Tamiflu.

** The strange and virulent outbreak in the Ukraine, where the WHO has been

deafeningly silent about its findings - but knows that whatever is the

cause, vaccination is the answer.

 

 

We seem to regard germs the same way we think about terrorism:

 

 

 

Random attacks that can be deadly. All parties who promote vaccination hawk

this view, particularly those pushing both types of flu shots. Tens of

millions have been spent in the US on national advertising campaigns, and

even Sesame Street merchandising, to convince us that flu shots are

necessary to keep us well -

 

 

 

and keep us alive. But perhaps we have it backwards. Bugs can cause random,

mostly benign attacks, particularly among the healthy. But random, deadly

attacks, with health consequences that can show up years later? Id worry

more about the vaccines.

 

 

 

After 200 years, with our many advances in science and medicine, you would

think that someone could develop a method to protect babies and adults from

infectious disease other than injecting them with animal cells, stray

viruses, heavy metals and toxic chemicals. Why do we call this health and

protection? Until my dying breath I will never understand why people

resolutely defend - and demand - the right to inject themselves and their

children with these risky potients.

 

 

 

For those who meet resistance when trying to warn family and friends of

vaccine risks, the only thing to do, really, is to keep spreading the word.

Dont be discouraged. You never know who is listening and you never know

when the seeds will sprout. Focus on those who are waking up and gratefully

support them. The rest, well sadly, they may have to find out the hard way

what it feels like to get hit by that stray bullet.