AN EYE OPENER....FOR Mr. Prime Minister and The President too...Will they act?

[Guest guest]

Dear all

In the matter of selection as CCIC, Mr MM Ansari stand no

where as has been debated by so many RTI activists, viz. Milap, Gour,

Major Ravindran. Pandey and many more members.

But who will bell the cat.?

who will stop P.M.?

Who will be requesting P.M. not to appoint Mr. Ansari as CCIC?.

 

we need to get replies of the above questions.

May God bless all those who say that Mr MM Ansari may not

be appointed as CCIC AS also those who are in favour of mr MM Ansari.

Regards

Dr. JN Sharma

 

On 11/20/09, H P <hgpandya wrote:

> *Ond friends Telephoned me stating that earlier Message: ANALYSIS OF THE

> REPORT OF PCRF made by Prof. M M Ansari, has been misutilising by some

> people for lobbying for Prof. Ansari to be appointed as Chief Information

> Commissioner of CIC, and as a result he is going to be appointed as CIC of

> CIC. I have posted the message just to know the true picture from Arvind

> Kejriwal and Company, while they are maintaining complete silence for the

> reasons best known to them. On telephone I replied to my friends that

> Government particularly Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh will not take any

> decision just after going through the aforesaid analysis or reported alleged

> powerful lobbying from Monopoly and Multinational Companies. However, hereby

> I am posting some of the comments received against Prof. Ansari, for the

> further comments from Prof. Ansari himself, for the end of justice. *

> **

> *Milap Choraria** *

>

> Dear Mr Milap

> I learn from reliable sources that Mr Ansari is being selected to head CIC.

>

> You are aware, Mr Ansari confessed on METRONATION on 29-06-2008 that he

> availed of hospitality of Indian Oil. For details you may search

> ANSARI+CORRUPTION on www.youtube.com.

>

> When I blew whistle on corruption in Indian Oil, Commissioner of

> Departmental Inquiry, CVC, New Delhi had conducted inquiry against Mr S J

> Anantharaj who was finally CENSURED. I had accordingly under RTI requested

> CVC to give me a copy of INQUIRY REPORT. Since CVC did not provide INQUIRY

> REPORT I lodged 2nd Appeal CIC/MA/A/2006/00097 with CIC and Mr Ansari was to

> hear the same. Mr Ansari has not yet heard this appeal for obvious reasons.

> In order to save his skin, Mr Ansari told on METRONATION that I was talking

> of hospitality because I myself was implicated in corruption case. As a

> matter of fact truth is other way round and he has defamed from a public

> platform. I have therefore filed CRIMINAL DEFAMATION COMPLAINT in Patiala

> House Courts in June 2009.

>

> Mr Ansari has not provided information against Indian Oil in a number of

> other appeals of S/Shri Mahendra Gaur and B D Vaghela, Mrs Saroj Tyagi

> etc.etc. I thererfore wish that my reliable source is wrong.

>

> With regards M K TYAGI 20-11-2009

> *_*

>

> Mahendra Gaur, Advocate, Jaipur 2009/11/19

> " बड़े बड़ाई न करें, बड़े न

बोले बोल, रहिमन हीरा कब कहे, लख

टका मेरो

> मोल. AN ANALYSIS OF THE REPORT OF PCRF (AUTHORS OF RTI AWARDS) FLAWED

LOGIC

> AND SPECIOUS CONCLUSIONS

> Milap Choraria

>

<milap_choraria<http://us.mc1121.mail./mc/compose?to=milap_ch\

oraria >>,

> SHRI M M ANSARI

>

<mm.ansari<http://us.mc1121.mail./mc/compose?to=mm.ansari (AT) nic (DOT) in\

>

>>

> Cc: B D VAGHELA , Mahendra Tyagi

>

> * MAHENDRA GAUR B.E., P.G.D.M, LL.B. ADVOCATE

>

> B-90, SARASWATI MARG,

>

> BAJAJ NAGAR, JAIPUR-302015

>

> T/FAX 0141-2705901, PHONE: 09829059018

> *

> *November 19, 2009*

>

> *

> *

>

> *Dear Mr. Ansari, *

>

> *

> *

>

> *Statistics are like a bikini; What is revealed is interesting; What

> is concealed is crucial. If this logic applies to PCRF, it applies more to

> your letter (Annexure 'A'). All 2,63, 261 would like to file second appeal,

> but don't (a) because it is expensive (b) they know 'अंधे के

आगे रोये, अपने

> भी नैन खोये'| © the delays in disposal of 2nd Appeal. The

so called

> protagonists also need funds/awards for their study/efforts. You as well as

> them (protagonists) are chips of the same plank. This washing dirty linen is

> nothing but 'नूरा कà¥à¤¶à¥à¤¤à¥€'| *

>

>

> **

>

> *Mr. Ansari before firing this letter you should have searched your own

> heart and credentials. What is your background? For statistical analysis

> sample size of 6,000.00 is too large and unmanageable. The flawed results

> are because of too large sample size. Thank God many people like me avoided

> responding to PCRF letters after having realized that organizations like

> ONGC (with poor RTI record) were doing campaign funding. Otherwise

> distortions would have been still larger. *

>

>

> **

>

> *I grudgingly agree with you that survey is flawed, motivated, self serving

> and promoting some at the cost of other. I also have a grudge that a person

> like you continues to be Information Commissioner to write the following

> letter (Annexure 'A') (Which was copy of my earlier Message relating to

> analysis.)*

>

>

> **

>

> *You and Oil Industry jointly introduced corruption in the Central

> Information Commission. Analysis of just three cases pertaining to Mr.

> Babubhai Vaghela, Mr. Mahendra Kumar Tyagi and myself are sufficient to rate

> you as the worst and most corrupt IC. You have through your friends in

> Indian Oil have engaged me in a defamation suit in Mumbai for damages worth

> 50 lakhs. *

>

>

> **

>

> *On a TV show hosted by Mr. Arvind Kejriwal (your bête noire) you lied that

> Mr. Mahendra Kumar Tyagi was implicated in a corruption case therefore he

> hurled wild allegations at you. NO Mr. Ansari. He did not face any

> corruption charges but you face corruption charges as IC. Tyagi was right.

> You did not enjoy the hospitality of Indian Oil innocently. You

> were morally and financially corrupt in accepting and enjoying that

> hospitality. You abused your authority in dismissing our second appeals in

> favour of Indian Oil. Indian Oil has till date not supplied the information

> that you had ordered to disclose. If I bring a complaint again it will heard

> by you. What is the use of second appeal against IOC as long as you are IC.

> Thank God you are not in the reckoning as CCIC. *

>

>

> **

>

> *Mr. Ansari as an officer of Indian Oil (a public servant for 23 years) I

> too enjoyed hospitality of many an Industrial Customers, but I never allowed

> my judgment to be affected by it. Given a chance I would not accept it

> again. It is your patronage that Oil Industry is successful in killing RTI

> Act and charge sheeting Mr. Babubhai Vaghela. The corruption of Indian Oil

> is reflected in accidents like Jaipur Fire (your hands are also soaked in

> blood of those 11 innocent people who lost their lives).*

>

>

> **

>

> *Supreme Court Judges (I am no admirer of Judiciary) recuse from the cases

> even when they are holding shares in the company, and here you are sticking

> to oil industry portfolio when you have been accused of hobnobbing with

> them. I still recall that during the first RTI convention organized by CIC

> in VIGYAN BHAWAN speaker after speaker castigated you, alleged that you

> threatened appellants with dire consequences. I have personally seen your

> cozy relationship with CPIO of BPC, IOC. *

>

>

> **

>

> *In my humble submissions, you should refrain from joining Public Debate and

> maintain silence. Your efficacy would be ultimately judged by the decisions

> you give rather than such surveys. Even worse critics of Mr. Wajahat

> Habibullah are now appreciating his contribution. *

>

>

> **

>

> *I am ready to join Public Debate with you on the allegations made against

> you. You may seek compliance report from IOC, BPC, HPC and IBP (now IOC). It

> will be an eye opener (if you are innocent) that they have not complied with

> your orders. If they did not disclose in connivance with you the matter is

> over. Any self respecting person would have either mended his ways or

> resigned, you have done neither as reflected from your letter. You want

> hospitality and awards and rewards, at the cost of livelihood and lives of

> innocent people. Indian Oil is corrupting investigation in Jaipur Fire

> tragedy also. I hope you will take this letter in right spirit and mend your

> ways as you are now left with 11 months only to repair the damage caused in

> 49 months. The object of the letter is to give you an honest feedback and

> not to hurt your feelings. The surgery is meant to cure you. *

>

>

> **

>

> *I saw your letter on RTI Times. They do not accept my posts. I am therefore

> sending the reply directly to you and the persons through whom I got your

> letter. Like your letter, the reply is being put in public domain to

> generate a healthy debate. *

>

>

> **

>

> * " बड़े बड़ाई न करें, बड़े न बोले

बोल, रहिमन हीरा कब कहे, लख टका

मेरो मोल.*

>

>

> **

>

> * " à¤à¤¸à¥€ वाणी बोलिà¤,मन का आपा खोय।

औरों को शीतल करे,आपहॠशीतल होय. "

(with

> sincere apologies to the poet)*

>

>

> **

>

> *with regards,*

>

>

> **

>

>

> **

>

> *Mahendra Gaur *

>

> *Dismissed by Indian Oil in 2000*

>

> *Concealing information about the attendance and salary record.*

>

> *I have not got details of salary, perks, medical claims etc. Indian Oil *

>

> *had to cultivate Mr. Ansari to block this information. *

>

> *______*

>

> **

> * " urvashi sharma " ***

> * " Wajahat Habibullah " <whabibullah, " Comissioner RTI " <

> mm.ansari, shaileshgandhi, pcrf, " Parivartan India " *

>

*parivartan_india*<http://us.mc1121.mail./mc/compose?to=\

parivartan_india (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com>

> **

> **

> *PCRF data may not be a 100% representative data but this is true data

> and not a fake exercise like many other bogus surveys done inside the rooms.

> *

> * *

> *whatever is coming out of it , all ic's should respect this verdict of the

> rti-users and try to excel in areas , they are lagging.*

> * *

> *i have been reiterating it since long that no info-commissioner deserve any

> award , and since their performance is far less than 100 percent they need

> training . so please no award to them .*

> * *

> *they have to perform 100% for which they get wages n perks. they r public

> servants . no award to servants . only BAKSHISH .*

> * *

> *pls read the news below-*

> * *

> *

>

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/We-aren-t-schoolkids--won-t-accept-demeaning-R\

TI-awards--Wajahat/544068

>

*<http://www.indianexpress.com/news/We-aren-t-schoolkids--won-t-accept-demeaning\

-RTI-awards--Wajahat/544068>

> *We aren’t schoolkids, won’t accept demeaning RTI awards: Wajahat*

> *Krishnadas

> Rajagopal*<http://www.indianexpress.com/columnist/krishnadasrajagopal/>

> * Tags : **chief information commissioner**, **wajahat habibullah**, **rti

> awards** Posted: Friday , Nov 20, 2009 at 0408 hrs New Delhi: *

> * ** *

> **

> *Calling it “demeaning,†Central Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat

> Habibullah has said that information commissioners will not accept “RTI

> awards†to be announced by Public Cause Research Foundation (PCRF) founded

> by Magsaysay Award winner and activist Arvind Kejriwal. **Kejriwal,

> incidentally, is also behind the campaign to push for Kiran Bedi as

> Habibullah’s replacement. *

> **

> *“We have called a weekly meeting of information commissioners and decided

> not to accept awards. We have already told the organizers. Information

> Commissioners are not in competition with each other. Giving awards to

> information commissioners is shamely de-meaning us, we are not

> schoolchildren. The Information Commissions work as a unified whole,â€

> Habibullah said. Habibullah has resigned to take up his new assignment in

> J & K. *

> **

> *The current seniormost Central Information Commissioner M M Ansari — a

> likely contender for the top job — has questioned the activists’

credentials

> to evaluate the work of information commissioners in an award

> ceremonycalled the ‘National RTI Awards 2009.’

> *

> **

> **

> * *

> *Ansari claims that the exercise — it will name the “best five†and the

> “worst five†— is nothing more than “eyewash...deliberately promoting

some

> at the cost of others.†*

> **

> *When contacted, Kejriwal said: “This is an attempt to bring the

> functioning of authorites under public scrutiny. People have the right to

> assess the performance of public authorities. We, as citizens, are

> performing our duties as envisaged in a democracy and celebrating the

> performance of some.†*

> **

> *The jury will announce the rankings on November 27. The awards ceremony is

> on December 1. N R Narayana Murthy and the Tata Trust have sponsored the

> research and the awards ceremony is sponsored by NDTV and ONGC, said

> Kejriwal.*

> **

>

> *URVASHI SHARMA

> _____*

> * " Common Cause " *

> **

> **

> **

> * " Milap Choraria " <milap_choraria*

> **

> *Cc:

>

**mm.ansari*<http://us.mc1121.mail./mc/compose?to=mm.ansari (AT) nic (DOT) \

in>

> **

> *Actually, I am very impressed with the letter of Prof. M.M.Ansari. He

> deserves to be promoted the the post of CMI (Central Misinformation

> Comissioner) or even CDI (Central Disinformation Commissioner. I know from

> my personal experience that he does not believe in Right to Information and

> believes that the RTI Act, 2005 (to use his own phrase) " is not worth even

> the paper on which it was written " . Nothing proves his contempt for the

> Right to information more than his self confessed ignorance about Arvind

> Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Abhinandan Shekhri.*

> *- Sarvesh Sharma*

> *___________*

>

> I agree with Mr Ansari.

>

>

>

> But, will you please ask Mr Ansari to read some of his own orders as a CIC

> and his behaviour towards appellants/complainants who appear before him ?

>

>

>

> He should definitely get the award for the “worst behaved†and “most

> unreasoned†IC in India .

>

>

>

> C J Karira

>

> *_______________________________ *

> * " Ravindran P M " *

>

> **

> * " Milap Choraria " <milap_choraria*

>

*mm.ansari*<http://us.mc1121.mail./mc/compose?to=mm.ansari (AT) nic (DOT) i\

n>

> *Dear Mr Choraria*

> * *

> *How I wish Ansari used his acumen for analysis while considering the

> appeals/complaints before him! I know of atleast two activists-Mr Mahendra

> Gaur and Mr Babubai Vaghela- who have enough cases to prove that he had

> stored his brain away in the freezer while considering appeals/complaints

> against one public authority atleast, that is the IOC. Incidently, isn't he

> the one who toured at the cost of IOC to Mumbai and Chennai teaching them

> how deny info to the public?*

> * *

> *regards n bw*

> * *

> *ravi*

> ____________________________

>

> " REJIMON C K "

> " Milap Choraria " <milap_choraria, Arvind Kejriwal, Krishnaraj

> Rao,

> the reasrch by Shri. M M Ansari based on report submitted by PIO or CPIO

> under Section 25 of RTI Act 2005.

> We all know how many CPIO/PIO submit their annual report under 25..

> so there is no truth in this.. Mr. Ansari is wasting public fund and the

> salary which he takes from tax payers money is diverted for such resarch ?

> I am sure Mr. Kejriwal, Sisodia and Sekhri will comment with their immense

> knowledge along with facts and figures.

> Rejimon

> *

> *

>