Food Standards admits not accepting scientific evidence regarding aspartame ADI and free methyl alcohol, in favor of aspartame propaganda proven to be false

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr. Johnson,

 

It's your statement that bothers me immensely. In other words, the

information on free methyl alcohol is known scientifically throughout

the world, the propaganda by the aspartame industry has been taken

apart and shown to be in error for 3 decades, and what you're saying

is no matter how much scientific evidence there is Food Standards is

wrong you're not going to change. You're going to allow people to

use a deadly addictive excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic, genetically

engineered drug that interacts with drugs and vaccine and is mass

poisoning consumers in Europe and the rest of the world.

 

First Food Standards was given this report with comments from leading

aspartame experts on the subject of the ADI and free methyl alcohol

in

aspartame:

http://www.mpwhi.com/statement_for_food_standards_october_2009.htm In

one case there is a comment from Dr. Alemany who did research and

showed the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol binds

to tissue. That's binding to living tissue. When people are dead

its called binding to dead tissue. In lay terms that's " Do It

Yourself Embalming " . And that's okay with Food Standards that the

people of the UK have their tissues embalmed while they are living as

discussed in Dr. H. J. Roberts medical text, Aspartame Disease: An

Ignored Epidemic, www.sunsentpress.com on pre-embalming. So let me

be sure I understand, it's okay to be embalmed.

http://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf This happens

because of conversion from the free methyl alcohol which you state is safe?

 

Food Standards was created to get away from industry influence, so

why doesn't Food Standards care about consumers health? You might as

well hold up a sign and say: " We are influenced by the aspartame

industry and scientific proof that their information is false will

not be accepted! "

 

My letter to you showed that everything in your letter was wrong:

http://www.mpwhi.com/response_letter_to_fsa.htm Your letter to me

today says that won't make a difference. Even the FDA toxicologist,

Dr. Adrian Gross, who had asked that Searle be indicted for fraud,

admitted to Congress as mentioned in this letter that no ADI should

have been allowed to be made because aspartame caused cancer and

violated the Delaney Amendment. So aspartame was approved illegally

and as Dr. Gross told Congress in summary, " If the FDA violates its

own laws who is left to protect the public? " Why do you think there

is a Mission Possible International with operations in 40 nations

warning the world off aspartame? Because FDA failed, and there is

nobody to protect the public. The defense team hired the two

prosecutors who were to indict Searle, and the political chicanery of

Don Rumsfeld got aspartame marketed after the FDA Board of Inquiry

revoked the petition for approval. The FDA Commissioner who was

about to sign it into law was fired in the middle of the night by the

Reagan Transition Team that Rumsfeld was on. Why do you think there

is a UK Aspartame Awareness Campaign? Because Food Standards has

failed the people of the UK!

 

Furthermore, aspartame was not proven safe in the UK and was marketed

there through a business deal with Paul Turner with the agency that

became Food Standards to get away from industry

influence.

http://www.mpwhi.com/how_aspartame_got_approved_in_england.htm Read

the article in the Guardian.

 

Further information to Food Standards proved beyond a shadow of a

doubt aspartame was never proven safe. The Bressler Report or FDA

audit on some of Searle's studies showed the fraud, and two studies

were so bad the FDA deleted them from the report so the public would

never see them. Yet, they were used as pivotal in the approval of

aspartame along with a 52 week oral toxicity study on 7 infant

monkeys which showed 5 had grand mal seizures and 1 died. Four types

of seizures are on the FDA list of 92 documented symptoms on

aspartame.

http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_hid_research_that_damned_aspartame.htm So

the studies that put aspartame on the market to be rubber stamped

around the world never proved safety but proved fraud and deceit.

 

What you're telling me Dr. Johnson is it doesn't make any difference,

that you're going to keep aspartame on the market even though its a

deadly poison that is killing people, murdering babies in their

mother's womb or triggering birth defects like

autism: http://www.rense.com/general/asp.htm , causing sudden

cardiac death: http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_and_arrhythmias.htm and

http://www.rense.com/general67/alert.htm, triggering diabetes,

obesity, neurodegenerative diseases, and causing cancer is okay.

 

Food Standards goes through the motions, meets with the UK Aspartame

Awareness Campaign, accepts all scientific evidence and discards it

to accept the aspartame manufacturers' propaganda, leaving consumers

in the UK to be poisoned. Jim McDonald's letter to you says it very well:

 

Dear Mr Johnson,

 

Thank you for your reply below, I would just like to confirm what you

are saying.

 

You are confirming that:

 

1) The COT /FSA has discounted the Free Methanol derivative of

Asp as a danger to health for the past 27 years., and have never

considered it in a safety review.

2) FSA is unable to calculate and ADI for pure methanol, in

spite of the wealth of accepted scientific evidence as to its toxicity.

3) FSA have no reply to the Challenge, that when free methanol

is considered the current ADI of Asp is 36 times too high for safety.

4) FSA does not recognise that the symptoms (in your

possession) shown by anecdotal evidence sufferers, exactly matches

that of methanol poisoning.

5) FSA is confirms that the population can consume small

amounts of free methanol daily without eventual harm.

6) FSA, having ignored anecdotal evidence for 27 years for not

being scientific evidence, Will Still not accept that that when

sufferers STOP using Asp (the source of the free methanol) they get

better FAST.

7) FSA does not recognise the MSDS as a credible source of

information about dangerous chemicals.

 

I note your comments and have to say, either you are being

deliberately evasive, or are not in possession of all the facts. Free

Methanol is a cumulative poison and yes the human body can handle

small quantity of free methanol safely, but not if repeated as an

increasing daily dose for up to 20 yrs the reason is - free methanol

is a CUMULATIVE poison.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

James McDonald

UK Aspartame Awareness Campaign 2008

 

----------

Johnson, Stephen [stephen.Johnson]

19 November 2009 09:56

James McDonald

[PHISHING]RE: Reply to FSA letter 9-11

 

Dear Mr McDonald

 

I am replying to your further letter of 12 November.

 

We have considered your views on methanol toxicity expressed at our

meeting and in correspondence. As we said in our letter of 9

November, methanol is not a cumulative poison per se and the body can

safely handle a small quantity of methanol,

 

We are interested in the claims of ill-health following consumption

of aspartame made by some consumers and doctors, that is why we have

commissioned a new research study.

 

At this stage we have nothing further to add.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Steve

 

Dr Stephen Johnson

Head - Food Additives Branch

UK Food Standards Agency

Tel: (0044) (0) 207 276 8508

____________________________

***********

 

Your views on toxicological effects of free methyl alcohol are

industry propaganda and we proved that.

Giving you correct scientific effects of free methyl alcohol from

independent researchers and physicians you refuse to accept. You

have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that you only intend to

accept industry propaganda and no amount of correct scientific data

will be accepted ever.

 

Even Ajinomoto knows that we have gotten the facts all over the

planet on aspartame toxicity and the politics that got a chemical

poison marketed for human use. You may remember that MSG got a bad

name so they changed it to many other names to confuse the

public. http://www.truthinlabeling.org/hiddensources.html No way

to show MSG safe and non-reacting so the glutamate people used

aspartame as a placebo for over a quarter of a century and even

before it was approved. Now Ajinomoto is doing the same thing with

aspartame because the public now knows its poison. They are changing

the name of aspartame to AminoSweet: Article at

http://www.opednews.com/articles/attn-RICHMOND-World-s-lar-by-Stephen-Fox-091117\

-828.html

OpEdNews - Article: World's largest aspartame maker Ajinomoto is

trying to rename it AMINOSWEET!

 

Until such time as Food Standards and the European Food Safety

Authority are willing to put consumers before industry influence, why

is there a need for these agencies to exist? What you're doing it

filling web sites with industry propaganda which stumbles the public

so they will use a poison and can die or be seriously maimed with all

sorts of diseases triggered by this poison. As Dr. Maria Alemany

said to me in Barcelona, " Aspartame can kill 200 million

people. " The only way that Food Standards can change that is

accepting scientific facts and rejecting industry lies. At least at

EFSA, Dr. Herman Koeter put out a press release and admitted that

EFSA was pressured by industry to hijack science.

 

You must remember that anyone on aspartame cannot be successfully

treated for any of the symptoms and diseases aspartame triggers or

precipitates because it interacts with drugs. As Dr. Roberts has

said for a quarter of a century, the only way they can get well is to

get off aspartame. So they are doomed while Food Standards turns a

deaf ear and blind eye to favor aspartame industry influence. Food

Standards also has to turn a blind eye to independent scientific peer

reviewed studies which have also proved the point.

 

Food Standards has refused " factual " scientific evidence on free

methyl alcohol in aspartame as well as a statement from the FDA

toxicologist who investigated aspartame and said no ADI can be set

because aspartame causes cancer.

 

I consider the situation deplorable. I've lectured in the UK twice

and wherever I went people were seriously ill on aspartame, with

reports of many who died. We've spent a lot of time and effort

getting the facts to Food Standards to be intentionally disregarded

to continue with industry influence and their fairy tale

propaganda. What happens if your study proves toxicity. Will you

ban aspartame or ask Ajinomoto what to do next? Will you ever answer

why you do not accept the views of the two toxicologists who

investigated aspartame and said it was never proven safe?

 

Dr. Betty Martini. D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

770 242-2599

www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net

Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame

 

At 11:52 AM 11/19/2009, Johnson, Stephen wrote:

>Dear Dr Martini

>

>I'm replying to your letter of 13 November.

>

>We are interested in the claims of ill-health following consumption

>of aspartame made by some consumers and doctors, that is why we have

>commissioned a new research study. We will also be interested to

>receive a copy of the study protocol you have offered.

>

>We obviously have different views on the toxicological effects of

>methanol but I do not think further correspondence on this issue is

>going to resolve our different opinions.

>

>Yours sincerely

>

>Stephen Johnson

>

>Dr Stephen Johnson

>Head - Food Additives Branch

>UK Food Standards Agency

>Tel: (0044) (0) 207 276 8508