Guest guest Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Thanks, I didn't know but suspected that it was controlled.Josephine , " Clare McConville-Harris GOOGLE " <theclaremcharris wrote: > > > http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article077.htm > > On August 19th, 2009 the American Association of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) filed suit in a New York State Supreme Court against the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., (solely as a nominal Defendant) and John or Jane Does 1-10. The Complaint Number is 09111917. > > This is a very important case to the anyone involved in health care anywhere in the world.. Why? Because Wikipedia articles about health care have turned Wikipedia into a propaganda machine - with the full knowledge, and cooperation, of the management of both the Wikipedia Project, and the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia is the fourth ranked website on Planet Earth. > > More, the abuse is so obvious, and so extensive, I strongly suspect that the Wikimedia Foundation's claims of " funding by donations " is an outright lie. I believe that a good case can be made that some, if not all, of Wikimedia's so-called " Anonymous Contributions " (the majority of contributions) are, in fact, " Fee for Service Contracts " in disguise, initiated by those controlling and paying for the writing of the articles. > > In short, I believe that Wikipedia is a fraud. Because Wikipedia ranks so high in " hits, " links from Wikipedia to a scurrilous website give that site first page positioning on search engines. So, the " Fee for Service " people get a double benefit: (a) They control health care articles on the fourth ranked website in the world, and (b) they get top search engine positioning for the rest of their propaganda. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.