A4M Sues Wikipedia - Quackbuster(?) PropagandistsTargeted...span style=fon

[Guest guest]

Thanks, I didn't know but suspected that it was controlled.Josephine

 

, " Clare McConville-Harris GOOGLE "

<theclaremcharris wrote:

>

>

> http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article077.htm

>

> On August 19th, 2009 the American Association of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M)

filed suit in a New York State Supreme Court against the Wikimedia Foundation,

Inc., (solely as a nominal Defendant) and John or Jane Does 1-10. The Complaint

Number is 09111917.

>

> This is a very important case to the anyone involved in health care anywhere

in the world.. Why? Because Wikipedia articles about health care have turned

Wikipedia into a propaganda machine - with the full knowledge, and cooperation,

of the management of both the Wikipedia Project, and the Wikimedia Foundation.

Wikipedia is the fourth ranked website on Planet Earth.

>

> More, the abuse is so obvious, and so extensive, I strongly suspect that the

Wikimedia Foundation's claims of " funding by donations " is an outright lie. I

believe that a good case can be made that some, if not all, of Wikimedia's

so-called " Anonymous Contributions " (the majority of contributions) are, in

fact, " Fee for Service Contracts " in disguise, initiated by those controlling

and paying for the writing of the articles.

>

> In short, I believe that Wikipedia is a fraud. Because Wikipedia ranks so

high in " hits, " links from Wikipedia to a scurrilous website give that site

first page positioning on search engines. So, the " Fee for Service " people get

a double benefit: (a) They control health care articles on the fourth ranked

website in the world, and (b) they get top search engine positioning for the

rest of their propaganda.

>