Guest guest Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 This is the time of year that always makes me worry about the children. Mars admitted aspartame is in their Mars bars under " natural flavors " . The FDA has been petitioned to allow aspartame in yogurt and dairy products unlabeled. Hershey refuses to tell me if aspartame is in their Vanillin. Now Ajinomoto wants a new aspartame product approved by FDA called Advantame, derived from the same amino acids as aspartame and vanillin which have been shown to interact. <http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Product-Categories/Sweeteners-intense-bulk-pol\ yols/Ajinomoto-seeks-FDA-approval-for-new-sweetener>http://www.foodnavigator-usa\ ..com/Product-Categories/Sweeteners-intense-bulk-polyols/Ajinomoto-seeks-FDA-appr\ oval-for-new-sweetener Here is information on the interaction and you can also look at the studies on google: <http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/aspart.p4>http://www.holisticmed.com/aspar\ tame/aspart.p4 People on our street know we are religious and don't celebrate the Devil's Day. However, I watch children going from door to door getting all kinds of candies with who knows what kind of poisons. As you go to the grocery store you see consumers pick up bags and bags of processed candies. I would like to ask that anyone giving children anything stay away from processed candies. Perhaps an organic apple or something you know isn't harmful. Preferably also keep your children home, and keep your pets inside. Just Like Sugar www.justlikesugarinc.com sold in places like Whole Foods can be used to make cookies. Dr. Russell Blaylock, neurosurgeon asked that it be analyzed and has no additives in it and no excitotoxins. He wrote in three of his newsletters: " Finally a safe sweetener " . It is made of chicory, orange peel, Vitamin C from Organic Oranges and Calcium. They will be making soon cookies and candies so finally there will be something parents can trust and children can enjoy. Also remember that aspartame and MSG which have a synergistic and additive effect are hidden in artificial and natural flavors. I tell people over and over again, go back to scratch. Never use processed foods. It may take more time but it can save lives. Also remember about the interaction of so many of these poisons. A study in Liverpool in 2005 on combining food additives including aspartame was damning. The Liverpool team reported when mouse nerve cells were exposed to MSG and brilliant blue or aspartame and quinoline yellow in laboratory conditions, combined in concentrations that theoretically reflect the compound that enters the bloodstream after a typical children's snack and drink, the additives stopped the nerve cells growing and interfered with proper signaling systems. Especially be cautious of one of the most serious products when it comes to aspartame, and that's gum. Aspartame gum works like nitroglycerin under the tongue, goes through saliva straight to the brain. Here is Dr. H. J. Roberts report on it: http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_absorption.htm If you have purchased a bunch of candy take it back to the store, keep your children in and your animals safe. Remember what aspartame is, not an additive, but in reality an additive, excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic, genetically engineered drug that interacts with drugs and vaccine because of damage to the mitochondria or powerhouse of the cell. It's also an adjuvant and chelating agent: http://www.rense.com/general/asp.htm Read on about GMO mutated sugar beets below my signature. All my best, Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder Mission Possible International 9270 River Club Parkway Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, H. J. Roberts, M.D., www.sunsentpress.com Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., www.russellblaylockmd.com Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.soundandfury.tv > ><http://www.larryleptin.com/>www.LarryLeptin.com > > > > > >Health Update – Monsanto’s Mutated World and the FDA’s Human Experiment > > > > > >By Byron Richards > > > > > >America’s sugar crop is under GMO assault and >the FDA has begun a new era of human >experimentation. America is in dire need of a >new super hero – and he has arrived. It is >Larry Leptin, defending your right to be healthy. > > > > > >See Larry Leptin’s first episode: Halloween fun >as he takes on the GMO mutated sugar beets. > > > > > ><http://www.larryleptin.com/>www.LarryLeptin.com > > > > > >Monsanto’s Toxic and Mutated World – Is Sugar Safe to Eat? > > > >It should come as no surprise when a Monsanto >product poisons the earth and our food. Our >planet has never recovered from the forty-year >Monsanto-led PCB contamination that was banned >in the U.S. in 1977. To this day environmental >PCBs continue to degrade into highly toxic >furans and dioxins, wreaking all manner of human >health problem. The new case in point involves >several aspects: 1) the bizarre alteration of >the nature of food itself by splicing viral, >bacterial, and other life forms into the DNA of >food (GMO seeds and crops), and 2) the massive >increase in the use of glyphosate pesticide >(Round Up), which is polluting the water, soil, >and food across the globe. Both issues are >extremely problematic to human health. > >On September 21, 2009 a stunning shot was fired >across the bow of Monsanto and its new legion of >Frankenfood sugar beet >growers. ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/studies/entry/judge_rejects_approval_of_biote\ ch_sugar_beets>Judge >Jeffrey S. White of Federal District Court in >San Francisco said the Agriculture Department >should have done an environmental impact >statement as required by law. He said it should >have assessed the consequences from the likely >spread of the genetically engineered trait to >other sugar beets or to the related crops of >Swiss chard and red table beets. He said that >the potential elimination of farmer’s choice to >grow non-genetically engineered crops, or a >consumer’s choice to eat non-genetically >engineered food constituted a significant effect >on the environment that necessitated an >environmental impact statement. The case is >ongoing, with the next phase scheduled for October 30. > >Meanwhile, Monsanto is attempting damage control >during the second growing season of this genetic >monstrosity masquerading as food. The judge >hasn’t banned the current year’s crop or the >sale of Halloween candy which is now full of GMO >sugar. Of course, GMO sugar, like other GMO >“foods,” doesn’t need to be labeled as such >(because nobody in their right mind would buy it >if it were). Half the refined sugar in the U.S. >is from beets – and insiders say the industry >has quickly converted to the GMO Frankenfood >beets, estimating up to 95% of farmers are now >using them. Beet sugar is often mixed with cane >sugar, meaning that unless a product lists the >ingredient as cane sugar or organic cane sugar >then it now likely contains GMO mutant beet-derived sugar. > >Only the biotech industry and its >financially-associated friends believe GMO >Frankenfoods are safe to eat. The despicable >management at the FDA approved them, while >squashing and hiding from public view the >numerous safety objections of their scientific >staff. Common sense will tell virtually anyone >that having foreign organism DNA spliced into >the essence of food is an atrocity. > >Earlier this year the ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/studies/entry/doctors_warn_avoid_genetically_\ modified_food>American >Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) called >on physicians to educate their patients, the >medical community, and the public to avoid >genetically modified foods and provide >educational materials concerning GM foods and >health risks. They called for a moratorium on >GM foods, long-term independent studies, and >labeling. AAEM’s position paper stated, “Several >animal studies indicate serious health risks >associated with GM food, including infertility, >immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin >regulation, and changes in major organs and the >gastrointestinal system…There is more than a >casual association between GM foods and adverse >health effects. There is causation.” > >All of these Round Up ready Frankenfood crops >are leading to unprecedented use of Round Up >(glyphosate). In 1994 glyphosate pesticide use >was 7.9 million pounds. By 2005, with the >widespread use of Round Up, that number jumped >to 119.1 million pounds. This is breeding super >weeds that require ever increasing amounts of >Round Up, not to mention other new “super toxic” >pesticides just to keep up with the war on >weeds. The environmental impact of glyphosate >overuse has been reviewed in an article >published by ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/studies/entry/monsantos_toxic_herbicide_glyph\ osate_a_review_of_its_health_and_environmental_effects>Organic >Consumers Association. > >In August of 2009 French researchers reviewed >the evidence showing how ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/studies/entry/glyphosates_disrupt_sex_hormone\ s>glyphosates >disrupt human reproductive hormones (androgens >and estrogens). Their data indicates that >glyphosate-based herbicides residues in food, >feed, and the environment should be considered >and classified as carcinogens and reproductive >toxins – not unlike the PCBs of years gone >by. Once again Monsanto sits in the middle of >the controversy with human health hanging in the >balance. Does anyone trust Monsanto? > >Avoid GMO food like the plague. Don’t buy any >product made with GMO food or any product made >by a company that uses any GMO food. Demand >that GMO food be labeled so that consumers have >a clear choice. And look out for sugar, the >latest food to undergo Frankenfood mutation. > > >The FDA’s Peramivir H1N1 Swine Flu Experiment > > > >The FDA has now opened the door for widespread >human experimentation during this year’s flu >season, allowing an antiviral drug called >Peramivir to be used even though it has not >passed traditional standards of safety >testing. Ever since the FDA crafted its ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/freedom/articles/fda_news_060707/>Critical >Path agenda it has been looking for excuses to >expose vulnerable Americans to toxic drugs under >the false pretense of the greater good for >all. The H1N1 Swine Flu fear-mongering is >providing the cover that the FDA needs to >unleash an experiment. The new Obama FDA >administration has accepted the baton pass from >the recently departed Bush FDA management team >(<http://www.wellnessresources.com/freedom/articles/the_fda_an_agency_out_of_co\ ntrol_part_1_of_2/>von >Eschenbach, et al.). > >Hypocrisy at the FDA runs deep in their >culture. The organization fails to warn the >public of the known immunosuppressive effects of >commonly used drugs such as ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/antacids_increase_the_risk_fo\ r_pneumonia/>antacids >and ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/stains_increase_the_risk_for_\ pneumonia/>statins >– drugs that have been shown to increase the >risk for infection. At the same time, the FDA >has branded all nutrition as fraud. What right >does the FDA have to brand nutrition as >fraud? Nutrition has been battling influenza >since humans have been around. Without >nutrition humans would have never survived any >flu pandemic. Nutrition is harmless to human >health and invaluable to survival. In the FDA’s >mind it is illegal. Rather, human >experimentation is now deemed legal by the >FDA. It’s all about protecting and expanding >the profits of Big Pharma and Big Biotech. > >Like Tamiflu and Relenza, Peramivir is a >neuraminidase inhibitor. Neuraminidase (the N >part of H1N1) is a viral protein that must be >active in order for new viruses to emerge from a >virally infected cell. If it can be blocked, >then viral spreading can be reduced. > >Tamiflu and Relenza only bind to neuraminidase >for a brief period of time, limiting their >biological activity against a virus. In >contrast, Peramivir binds very tightly to >neuraminidase and is longer lasting – meaning it >is a much more potent drug. The FDA has >approved it for use in advanced Swine Flu cases >that are not responding to Tamiflu or Relenza. > >On the one hand, this sounds like a reasonable >approach to helping people with extreme Swine >Flu. What is likely to happen in actual >practice is another matter entirely. Doctors >will hear on the grapevine how well Peramivir >seems to work and it will be used on more and >more patients. And what’s wrong with that? > >It is a human experiment. Human experiments are >against the Nuremberg code, which has been >agreed to by the world following the atrocities >of Nazi Germany. Human experiments run counter >to the basic decency and morality of any culture >– except the culture of the FDA and its profit-driven pharmaceutical allies. > >The problem with neuraminidase blocking is that >there are four known human genes that utilize >neuraminidase for normal and healthy cell >function (NEU1, NEU2, NEU3, NEU4). The next >problem is that these genes are not passive and >secondary in cellular function. They regulate >carbohydrate-related communication taking place >on human cell membranes (glyconutrition and >glycobiology). In other words, they are >instrumentally involved in how cells talk to >each other, as well as in many processes of a >cell’s internal communication. Any >neuraminidase blocking drug runs the risk of >interfering with general communication needed for healthy cell function. > >The adverse side effects of ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/tamiflu_causes_delirium_and_s\ uicide_in_children/>Tamiflu >are in many cases rather extreme and include >panic attacks, delusions, delirium, convulsions, >depression, loss of consciousness, and even >suicide. ><http://www.wellnessresources.com/freedom/articles/brave_oxford_researchers_say\ _tamiflu_is_not_for_kids/>Oxford >researchers have publicly warned that Tamiflu is >not for children. Tamiflu is a relatively weak binder of neuraminidase. > >What is going to happen when a strong binder of >neuraminidase, Peramivir, latches on to the >human cellular communication system based on >neuraminidase genes? The FDA has no idea, but >their unelected bureaucratic management team has >decided in their infinite wisdom that the >benefits outweigh the risks, even though they >have no way of knowing. The era of sanctioned >human experimentation is upon us. > >What if there was a substance that blocked >neuraminidase regarding viral activity and left >human neuraminidase alone? Wow, what a >breakthrough that would be. Welcome to the >world of nutrition. The real fraud can be found >in the management team of the FDA. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.