Proposition 65 - Aspartame (and your info below)

[Guest guest]

Dear Cynthia:

 

I submitted this information to you on

aspartame: http://www.mpwhi.com/letter_to_cynthia_oshita.htm What

is being done about this addictive excitoneurotoxic, genetically

engineered, carcinogenic drug that interacts with drugs and vaccines

because of mitochondrial damage. The free methyl alcohol converts to

formaldehyde and embalms living tissue and damages DNA as we have

always known and now proven by the Trocho

Study: http://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf

Methanol and formaldehyde are on the list requiring a cancer warning.

 

Glad to see other information about these other chemicals. Remember

that aspartame interacts with not only drugs and vaccines but also

has a synergistic and additive effect with MSG and interacts with

other neurotoxins like

fluoride:

http://dorway.com/dorwblog/doctors-speak-out/aspartame-msg-other-excitotoxins-th\

e-hypothalamus/

and

http://dorway.com/dorwblog/doctors-speak-out/neurotoxic-interaction-of-msg-aspar\

tame-other-toxins/

This last article mentions fluoride.

 

Also note aspartame is a chelating agent and adjuvant, the reason it

is used in vaccines: http://www.rense.com/general/asp.htm

 

According to Dr. James Bowen if you go from aspartame to Splenda you

can maintain the reactions to aspartame and pick up those from the

chlorocarbon poison Splenda, and that's what we are seeing in the

complaints that continue to come in. One victim almost died recently

when he did this.

 

Can you please give me an update on this issue. The FDA

toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress that aspartame violated

the Delaney Amendment because it caused brain tumors and no allowable

daily intake should have been able to be set. Two Ramazzini Studies

peer reviewed by 7 world experts have shown aspartame to be a

multipotential carcinogen.

 

All my best,

Betty

 

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

770 242-2599

www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net

Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame

 

 

 

Proposition 65

 

 

 

 

 

Announcement of Chemicals Selected by OEHHA for Consideration for

Listing by the Carcinogen Identification Committee and Request for

Relevant Information on the Carcinogenic Hazards of These Chemicals

[10/15/09]

 

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of

Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is the lead agency for

the implementation of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement

Act of 1986 (Proposition 65). The Carcinogen Identification

Committee (CIC) of OEHHA's Science Advisory Board serves as the

State's qualified experts for rendering an opinion whether a chemical

has been clearly shown through scientifically valid testing according

to generally accepted principles to cause cancer. The chemicals

identified by the CIC are added to the Proposition 65 list, which

must be updated annually.

 

On

<http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/public_meetings/cicagenda051509.html>May

29, 2009, the CIC considered the priority ranking of 38 chemicals of

which they recommended that nine of the chemicals be placed in the

High priority category. OEHHA has initially selected five of the

nine chemicals for the CIC's review for possible listing under

Proposition 65 and is initiating the development of hazard

identification materials for these chemicals. [The remaining four

chemicals will be the subject of a future public notice or

notices.] The five chemicals are listed in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1. Chemicals Selected for Preparation of Cancer Hazard

Identification Materials and Review for Possible Listing by the

Carcinogen Identification Committee

 

Chemical

 

CAS No.

 

3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol

 

96-24-2

 

1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol

 

96-23-1

 

Fluoride and its salts

 

---

 

Diisononyl phthalate (DINP)

 

---

 

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and its salts and transformation and

degradation precursors

 

---

 

These chemicals were selected using the procedure described in the

document entitled: " Process for Prioritizing Chemicals for

Consideration under Proposition 65 by the State's Qualified Experts, "

adopted in 2004, and available on the Internet at

<http://www.oehha.ca.gov/>www.oehha.ca.gov.

 

OEHHA identified 38 chemicals through application of an epidemiology

data screen and an animal data screen, and a preliminary

toxicological evaluation of the available overall evidence of

carcinogenicity, as outlined in the 2004 prioritization

process. These 38 chemicals were

<http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/state_listing/prioritization_notice\

s/prior030509.html>presented

and released for public comment on March 5, 2009, along with a

separate listing of the relevant studies identified for each

chemical. These materials were provided to the Committee and also

made available on OEHHA's Web site at

<http://www.oehha.ca.gov/>www.oehha.ca.gov. The Committee met to

consider the materials for all 38 chemicals at a public meeting on

May 29, 2009. At this meeting, the Committee advised OEHHA by

majority vote that nine chemicals be given high priority

consideration for preparation of hazard identification

materials. The five chemicals identified in Table 1 are a subset of

the nine high priority candidates. The hazard identification

materials for the five chemicals will be presented at a future

meeting for Committee review for possible listing of the chemical

under Proposition 65. OEHHA anticipates announcing a similar request

for relevant information on the remaining four chemicals at a future date.

 

By this notice, OEHHA is providing the public an opportunity to

provide information relevant to the assessment of the evidence of

carcinogenicity for any of the chemicals listed in Table 1. Relevant

information includes but is not limited to: cancer bioassays, cancer

epidemiological studies, genotoxicity testing, and other pertinent

data on pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and effects on biochemical and

physiological processes in humans for any of the five

chemicals. Interested parties or members of the public wishing to

provide such information should send it to the address given below.

 

The publication of this notice marks the start of a 60-day data

call-in period. This period will end on Tuesday, December 15,

2009. The information received during this data call-in period will

be reviewed and considered by OEHHA as it prepares the cancer hazard

identification materials on these chemicals. This request for

information is the next step in the process described in the 2004

prioritization procedure.

 

Notification of the availability of the hazard identification

materials and of the time, date, location, and agenda of the meetings

of the Carcinogen Identification Committee where these chemicals will

be considered will be provided in subsequent notices published in the

California Regulatory Notice Register and will also be posted on

OEHHA's website. It is anticipated that the hazard identification

materials will be made available for a 60-day comment period prior to

the Committee meetings at which these chemicals will be considered.

 

Relevant information on these chemicals should be submitted to:

 

 

 

Cynthia Oshita

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Proposition 65 Implementation

P.O. Box 4010

1001 I Street, 19th Floor

Sacramento, California 95812-4010

FAX: (916) 323-8803

Or via e-mail to <coshitacoshita

 

Submittal of materials in electronic form is encouraged. It is

requested that all hard-copy materials be submitted in triplicate.

 

Submissions may also be delivered in person or by courier to the

above address. In order to be considered, the relevant information

must be received at OEHHA (if delivered in person or sent by FAX) by

5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 15, 2009.

 

 

 

<http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/state_listing/data_callin/sqe101509\

..html>http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/state_listing/data_callin/sqe1\

01509.html

 

 

New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.

<http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof>http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof

 

Follow NYSCOF On Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/nyscof

 

Fluoridation News Releases

<http://tinyurl.com/6kqtu>http://tinyurl.com/NewsReleases

 

Tooth Decay Crises in Fluoridated Areas

<http://www.fluoridenews.blogspot.com/>http://www.fluoridenews.blogspot.com/

 

Fluoride Action Network http://www.FluorideAction.Net

 

Fluoride Journal http://www.FluorideResearch.Org

 

Fluoride in the News:

<http://www.topix.net/drug/fluoride>http://www.topix.net/drug/fluoride

_