Guest guest Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 These timely updates are being sent via bcc to the people on my list. If you do not wish to receive them, let me know. They are messages from a friend of mine who is current with what's going on. This information is not being presented on the mainstream media. Read it and then you will know why. September 11, 2009 Note: some of these are being spit back at me... will let you know which ones and try to correct... Feel free to copy, edit, or add to this and send it yourselves. dee ---- Dee Nicholson 11/09/2009 3:19:03 AM andrer; anguswd; atkinn; baconl; bakerg; gautht; brownb; ironmi; damphh; callbc; campbel; carsts; champa; chapum; cochre; rattel; cookj; coolsa; cordyj; cowanj; dallar; dawsod; dayja; debanp; dininc; pdowne; dyckli; egglea; rokosg; fairbj; foxf; frasej; fureyg; goldsy; grafsj; harbm; hublee; jaffem; johnsj; joyals; kennyco; kinsen; charrf; lavigr; lebrem; losier; smithc; mahovf; massip; mccoye; meighen; mercet; merchp; milnel; mitchg; moorew; munsoj; murral; mcgeed; pepinl; nolinp; olived; russem; phaleg; lachah; poulim; poyv; prudhm; ringup; jcrivest; rompkw; kfl; sibnic; smithd; spivam; stollp; tardic; tkachd; wattc; zimmer; adamsw URGENT CONSIDERATION REQUESTED RE BILL C-6 To the Canadian Senate Dear Senators: Re: Bill C-6 " The Canada Consumer Product Safety Act " and Violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Upon the return of the Senate, its first order of business will be the second reading of the above-noted bill, and I am writing to tell you that according to the research of numerous authoritative sources, Bill C-6 is unconstitutional: its language violates the provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as follows: Authorization is given to a. search private property without a warrant b. seize private property without Court supervision c. destroy private property without Court supervision d. take control of businesses without Court supervision e. in some circumstances to keep seized private property without a Court order f. impose penalties without a Court order These rights are enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as our right of due process under the law. According to the Book of Criminal Procedurethe Charter is " the supreme law of the nation " and any legislation which abrogates Charter rights and freedoms isab initio " of no force or effect " : in a word, Bill C-6 is unconstitutional, because it could not stand a Charter Challenge, due to the fact that it removes the rights of ordinary Canadians. " For the first time in Canadian history, " lawyer Shawn Buckley explains, " Bill C-6 not only abolishes the law of trespass, but also allows warrants to be issued to search private homes without evidence of criminal wrongdoing, in violation of Section 8 of the Charter. " In the guise of a " consumer protection " act, yet containing language arbitrarily removing our rights, C-6 purports not to affect Natural Health Products, nor to abrogate the rights of anyone other than those importing unsafe/illegal products for use by Canadians. However, as you must be aware, language from one piece of legislation may be moved by ministerial regulatory change to any other. This means that as egregious as Bill C-6 is, for its denial of due process of law and consequent violation of the Constitution Act and Charter of Rights and Freedoms, its provisions may also be moved to apply to other contingencies, including martial law and a suspension of Canadian rights, for whatever purpose, including forced vaccinations. I note that in the state of Massachusetts, which is currently reviewing a Bill containing many of the same provisions, the Senator who introduced it is facing a call for impeachment proceedings on grounds of treason. (More info HERE) I would venture to say that that if an affront to the US Constitution is a treasonous offence, it is equally a treasonous offence to deny Canadians -- any Canadians, for any reason, at any time -- their right of due process of law. I also wish to point out that since you are now informed as to the nature of Bill C-6and its inherent risk to the freedoms guaranteed us in the " Supreme Law of the Land " your support of it could, would, and should be viewed as a violation of your senatorial oath, and treason against the people of Canada. Kindly govern yourselves accordingly: voting in support of Bill C-6 is not an option for any law-abiding governor. Sincerely yours, National Communication Director, Freedom in Canadian Health Care, 135 Gough Avenue, Toronto, ON M4K 3N9 416-778-9581 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.