A matter of great concern

[Guest guest]

Hello!I don't have much energy right now [fighting a tooth infection while trying to save the tooth], which is why I have suspended my regular news dispatch lately, but these are the latest developments on a trend I have seen growing over the past few months that's of particular concern to a lot of people, including me. Remember how keen the PNAC [Project for a New American Century] was on depopulation? Don't you believe for a minute that Obama thinks differently [i suppose that by now, you have lost most illusions about how Obama was to usher the meaningful change people voted for...]Oh, by the way, I read a precious little book [117 pages] last week [it was just published by iUniverse], and I warmly recommend it to everybody. It's called "THE GREAT WHITE HOAX -The suppressed Truth About the Pharmaceutical Industry", by Robert E. Catalano. It's written very simply, totally unpretentious but courageous and to the point, is inexpensive and easy to pass along. You can order it fromiUniverse [i don't have the link]orBarnes & Noble  http://snipurl.com/ieewaorAmazon.com  http://snipurl.com/ieet9For a synopsis, see http://www.medicine-no.com/Meanwhile, see for yourself how doctors are now insisting that ALL people older than 55 years old be put on toxic blood pressure drugs, regardless of their health [for one, I never had high blood pressure in my life, and my blood pressure was taken last week, it's lower than usual, the highest reading being 10.5! Lowering my blood pressure would kill me! - vl]: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8057850.stmTuesday, 19 May 2009Blood pressure pill action urgedEveryone aged 55 and over should be taking drugs to lower their blood pressure, a London-based expert says.>>Professor Law said the universal use of blood pressure drugs should be seen as analogous to vaccinating the entire population in the event of a flu pandemic.There was no case for trying to assess who was a top priority, he said, when everybody was potentially at risk.In fact, Professor Law said giving everybody blood pressure drugs would minimise the risk that people would be alarmed when told they needed to take the medication.Among those aged 65 living in England and Wales, the risk of having a heart attack in the next 10 years is about 10% for men and 5% for women, he added.<<============http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-endorses-government-mandated.htmlThursday, April 30, 2009Obama: Euthanasia of the elderly may be necessary >>THE PRESIDENT: ...I actually think that the tougher issue around medical care — it’s a related one — is what you do around things like end-of-life care —Yes, where it’s $20,000 for an extra week of life.THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. And I just recently went through this. I mean, I’ve told this story, maybe not publicly, but when my grandmother got very ill during the campaign, she got cancer; it was determined to be terminal. And about two or three weeks after her diagnosis she fell, broke her hip. It was determined that she might have had a mild stroke, which is what had precipitated the fall.So now she’s in the hospital, and the doctor says, Look, you’ve got about — maybe you have three months, maybe you have six months, maybe you have nine months to live. Because of the weakness of your heart, if you have an operation on your hip there are certain risks that — you know, your heart can’t take it. On the other hand, if you just sit there with your hip like this, you’re just going to waste away and your quality of life will be terrible.And she elected to get the hip replacement and was fine for about two weeks after the hip replacement, and then suddenly just — you know, things fell apart.I don’t know how much that hip replacement cost. I would have paid out of pocket for that hip replacement just because she’s my grandmother. Whether, sort of in the aggregate, society making those decisions to give my grandmother, or everybody else’s aging grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when they’re terminally ill is a sustainable model, is a very difficult question. If somebody told me that my grandmother couldn’t have a hip replacement and she had to lie there in misery in the waning days of her life — that would be pretty upsetting.And it’s going to be hard for people who don’t have the option of paying for it.THE PRESIDENT: So that’s where I think you just get into some very difficult moral issues. But that’s also a huge driver of cost, right?I mean, the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill out here.So how do you — how do we deal with it?THE PRESIDENT: ...you have to have some independent group that can give you guidance. It’s not determinative, but I think has to be able to give you some guidance. And that’s part of what I suspect you’ll see emerging out of the various health care conversations that are taking place on the Hill right now.In other words, faceless bureaucrats in Washington -- not your family -- will decide whether your grandparents live or die.While our health care system is certainly imperfect -- because all humans are imperfect, including doctors, nurses, hospitals and insurance companies -- they are more perfect, more competent, more informed, more capable than all of the bureaucrats to whom they'll be forced to report: a bureaucracy that will make all decisions about your health care.<<=============http://news./s/ap/20090519/ap_on_re_us/us_forced_chemoArrest ordered for mom of boy, 13, resisting chemoBy AMY FORLITI, Associated Press WriterTue May 19, 7:08 pm ETNEW ULM, Minn. – Authorities sought to arrest the mother of a 13-year-old boy with cancer who refuses chemotherapy after she fled with her son and missed a court hearing Tuesday on his welfare. A judge issued an arrest warrant and ordered that Daniel Hauser be placed in a foster home and be sent for an immediate examination by a pediatric oncologist so he can get treated for Hodgkins lymphoma.===========As to mandatory vaccinations, etc., http://snipurl.com/hguwd [Wash. Post]U.S. May Add Shots for Swine Flu to Fall RegimenBy Kimberly Kindy and Ceci Connolly Washington Post Staff Writers Wednesday, May 6, 2009 The Obama administration is considering an unprecedented fall vaccination campaign that could entail giving Americans three flu shots -- one to combat annual seasonal influenza and two targeted at the new swine flu virus spreading across the globe. >>The greater challenge will be tracking any adverse reactions as millions of Americans get multiple vaccinations in a matter of months this fall and winter. "There will be adverse effects to any vaccine. That's just science," said Michael Hattwick, who ran the CDC's vaccine-tracking system during the last swine flu scare. Hattwick said a "real-time" tracking system would need to be established to provide constant updates to the CDC about adverse reactions. That information, he said, should include lot numbers for the vaccines so health officials can trace each side effect to the manufacturer and the date of production. Routine flu vaccinations are not traced with such precision because reporting is voluntary and often delayed, Hattwick said. "In a regular seasonal flu, you get three vaccines. Adding an additional one should not present a problem," Fauci said. A record-keeping system would also need to be devised to track which doses patients have received, health experts said.<<=========http://us-constitutionalist.blogspot.com/2009/05/swine-flu-or-fda-which-is-more.htmlMONDAY, MAY 4, 2009Swine Flu or the FDA: Which Is More Dangerous to Your Health?By John W. Whitehead - The Rutherford Institute - May 4, 2009 In a 2005 article in the Village Voice entitled "Capitalizing on the Flu," James Ridgeway predicted that a "flu pandemic would spark enough fear to make it a greed pandemic." As Ridgeway observed, "With a worldwide market estimated at more than $1 billion, there's big money in a flu plague." In fact, the pharmaceutical industry has gone to great lengths through its lobbying and government contracts to ensure that it will get a good piece of the plague pie. Now with the swine flu set to become a global pandemic, Big Pharma is raking it in.>>First approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999, Tamiflu was promoted as a drug that could significantly reduce the length and severity of influenza. These claims even prompted the U.S. government to purchase 20 million doses of Tamiflu--at a cost of $2 billion--in the event that a bird flu pandemic occurred. The Pentagon followed suit, paying a whopping $58 million in July 2005 for treatments of U.S. troops around the world. However, problems with Tamiflu had already begun to surface as early as 2004 when it was alleged that the drug was causing some of its users to manifest very unusual behavior. For example, during the 2004 and 2005 flu seasons, two teenage boys committed suicide within hours of taking Tamiflu. The 17-year-old jumped in front of a large truck on a busy road after walking outside his house barefoot and in pajamas during a snowstorm. The 14-year-old jumped to his death from the balcony of a ninth-floor flat. Later, a teenage girl was narrowly prevented from jumping to her death from a window within days of starting a course of the flu drug. By November 2005, it had been reported that 12 Japanese children had died while on the drug and others had experienced hallucinations, encephalitis and other symptoms. Despite these alarming reports, the FDA opted not to issue a warning about the drug's potential for causing abnormal behavior. Instead, the FDA issued a warning about Tamiflu's potential for producing skin rashes. It wasn't until reports surfaced of more than 100 new cases of delirium, hallucinations and other abnormal psychiatric behavior in children treated with Tamiflu that the FDA changed course and required Roche, the Swiss company that makes the drug, to include a warning label cautioning patients, doctors and parents to look out for strange behavior in anyone taking the drug. However, Tamiflu is not the only drug to be suspected of having psychiatric side effects. There have been a disconcerting number of drugs which, although cleared by the FDA for use in treating epilepsy, asthma, influenza, obesity and smoking, are now believed to contribute to suicidal behavior.<< >>Certainly, this collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and the government should come as no surprise to anyone who keeps up with the news and the rampant corruption in the halls of Congress. But there are dire ramifications from Big Pharma's stranglehold on the U.S. government. As James Ridgeway writes in his recent article in Mother Jones, "Swine Flu: Bringing Home the Bacon," there are "winners as well as losers in every high-profile outbreak of infectious disease. First and foremost among them, of course, is Big Pharma, which can always be counted on to have its hand out wherever human misery presents an opportunity to rake in some cash." >>Clearly, Big Pharma are the winners here. Stock prices for pharmaceutical companies involved in the production of Tamiflu and Relenza have already jumped dramatically. And investors are already salivating at the prospect of the government insuring against future outbreaks by increasing its stockpiles of the drugs, as well as spending more on grants and funding for research.Note: If you'd like more info about the toxicity of Tamiflu and/or other "flu vaccines", just let me know, there are plenty of reports about it - vl]=========http://www.physorg.com/news159440823.htmlTamiflu 'may be tied to abnormal behavior'April 20th, 2009 The Yomiuri ShimbunInfluenza patients between ages 10 and 17 who took Tamiflu were 54 percent more likely to exhibit serious abnormal behavior than those who did not take the antiflu drug, according to a final report, released Saturday, from a Japanese Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry research team. ==========  http://www.prisonplanet.com/school-mass-vaccination-drill-in-alaska.html#comment-347098School Mass Vaccination Drill In AlaskaKTUU.comFriday, May 1, 2009ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska health officials and the Anchorage School District teamed up Wednesday to prepare for a worst case scenario by practicing a mass dispensing of vaccines.==========http://www.infowars.com/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-massachusetts-senate/Swine Flu Martial Law Bill Clears Massachusetts SenateInfowarsApril 29, 2009It took corporate media swine flu hysteria to ram through a martial law bill in Massachusetts. S18 gives the Governor the power to authorize the deployment and use of force to distribute supplies and materials and local authorities will be allowed to enter private residences for investigation and to quarantine individuals. The Associated Press reports:The Massachusetts Senate has unanimously passed a pandemic flu preparation bill that has languished in the Legislature before the recent swine flu outbreak.The 36-0 vote today sends the measure to the House. Both branches have taken it up in past years, but have not been able to agree on the details.The new Senate version would allow the public health commissioner — in a public health emergency — to close or evacuate buildings, enter private property for investigations, and quarantine individuals.The bill specifically mandates the following:(1) to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into and investigation of the premises; (2) to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated any building or facility, and to allow the reopening of the building or facility when the danger has ended; (3) to decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated, or to destroy any material; (4) to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons; (5) to require a health care facility to provide services or the use of its facility, or to transfer the management and supervision of the health care facility to the department or to a local public health authority; (6) to control ingress to and egress from any stricken or threatened public area, and the movement of persons and materials within the area; (7) to adopt and enforce measures to provide for the safe disposal of infectious waste and human remains, provided that religious, cultural, family, and individual beliefs of the deceased person shall be followed to the extent possible when disposing of human remains, whenever that may be done without endangering the public health; (8) to procure, take immediate possession from any source, store, or distribute any anti-toxins, serums, vaccines, immunizing agents, antibiotics, and other pharmaceutical agents or medical supplies located within the commonwealth as may be necessary to respond to the emergency; (9) to require in-state health care providers to assist in the performance of vaccination, treatment, examination, or testing of any individual as a condition of licensure, authorization, or the ability to continue to function as a health care provider in the commonwealthAny person who knowingly violates an order of the commissioner or his or her designee, or of a local public health authority or its designee, given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or both.==========Note:The way I see it, they'll keep beating the fear-mongering drums for a "pandemic" to start around September-October [when the labs will be ready with their "experimental vaccine,"] so that if their A-H1N1 doesn't kill enough of us [under the paragraph "Depopulation"], the vaccine will.... Whoever knows the abominations they'll put in those vaccines!!! If we can't nip it in the bud, then those who refuse the *mandatory* vaccine will be "quarantined" [meaning incarcerated and given the vaccine anyhow]. They are probably testing the waters right now to see how far they can go to mandate deadly poisons for 300 million people, in the US alone.... =====In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

[Guest guest]

Hi Viviane,

Sorry to hear about your infected tooth. Whatever you do, DO NOT get a root

canal. Its probably better to have the tooth removed then to continue to fight

infection as the infection can eventually cause harm to your heart. Take care,

Josephine

 

 

 

, Viviane Lerner <vivlerner wrote:

>

> Hello!

> I don't have much energy right now [fighting a tooth infection while

> trying to save the tooth], which is why I have suspended my regular

> news dispatch lately, but these are the latest developments on a

> trend I have seen growing over the past few months that's of

> particular concern to a lot of people, including me. Remember how

> keen the PNAC [Project for a New American Century] was on

> depopulation? Don't you believe for a minute that Obama thinks

> differently [i suppose that by now, you have lost most illusions

> about how Obama was to usher the meaningful change people voted for...]

> Oh, by the way, I read a precious little book [117 pages] last week

> [it was just published by iUniverse], and I warmly recommend it to

> everybody. It's called " THE GREAT WHITE HOAX -The suppressed Truth

> About the Pharmaceutical Industry " , by Robert E. Catalano. It's

> written very simply, totally unpretentious but courageous and to the

> point, is inexpensive and easy to pass along. You can order it from

> iUniverse [i don't have the link]

> or

> Barnes & Noble http://snipurl.com/ieewa

> or

> Amazon.com http://snipurl.com/ieet9

> For a synopsis, see http://www.medicine-no.com/

>

> Meanwhile, see for yourself how doctors are now insisting that ALL

> people older than 55 years old be put on toxic blood pressure drugs,

> regardless of their health [for one, I never had high blood pressure

> in my life, and my blood pressure was taken last week, it's lower

> than usual, the highest reading being 10.5! Lowering my blood

> pressure would kill me! - vl]:

>

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8057850.stm

> Tuesday, 19 May 2009

> Blood pressure pill action urged

> Everyone aged 55 and over should be taking drugs to lower their blood

> pressure, a London-based expert says.

>

> >>Professor Law said the universal use of blood pressure drugs

> should be seen as analogous to vaccinating the entire population in

> the event of a flu pandemic.

>

> There was no case for trying to assess who was a top priority, he

> said, when everybody was potentially at risk.

>

> In fact, Professor Law said giving everybody blood pressure drugs

> would minimise the risk that people would be alarmed when told they

> needed to take the medication.

>

> Among those aged 65 living in England and Wales, the risk of having a

> heart attack in the next 10 years is about 10% for men and 5% for

> women, he added.<<

>

> ============

>

> http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-endorses-government-

> mandated.html

>

> Thursday, April 30, 2009

> Obama: Euthanasia of the elderly may be necessary

>

> >>THE PRESIDENT: ...I actually think that the tougher issue around

> medical care — it's a related one — is what you do around things like

> end-of-life care —

>

> Yes, where it's $20,000 for an extra week of life.

>

> THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. And I just recently went through this. I

> mean, I've told this story, maybe not publicly, but when my

> grandmother got very ill during the campaign, she got cancer; it was

> determined to be terminal. And about two or three weeks after her

> diagnosis she fell, broke her hip. It was determined that she might

> have had a mild stroke, which is what had precipitated the fall.

>

> So now she's in the hospital, and the doctor says, Look, you've got

> about — maybe you have three months, maybe you have six months, maybe

> you have nine months to live. Because of the weakness of your heart,

> if you have an operation on your hip there are certain risks that —

> you know, your heart can't take it. On the other hand, if you just

> sit there with your hip like this, you're just going to waste away

> and your quality of life will be terrible.

>

> And she elected to get the hip replacement and was fine for about two

> weeks after the hip replacement, and then suddenly just — you know,

> things fell apart.

>

> I don't know how much that hip replacement cost. I would have paid

> out of pocket for that hip replacement just because she's my

> grandmother. Whether, sort of in the aggregate, society making those

> decisions to give my grandmother, or everybody else's aging

> grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when they're terminally

> ill is a sustainable model, is a very difficult question. If somebody

> told me that my grandmother couldn't have a hip replacement and she

> had to lie there in misery in the waning days of her life — that

> would be pretty upsetting.

>

> And it's going to be hard for people who don't have the option of

> paying for it.

>

> THE PRESIDENT: So that's where I think you just get into some very

> difficult moral issues. But that's also a huge driver of cost, right?

>

> I mean, the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives

> are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care

> bill out here.

>

> So how do you — how do we deal with it?

>

> THE PRESIDENT: ...you have to have some independent group that can

> give you guidance. It's not determinative, but I think has to be able

> to give you some guidance. And that's part of what I suspect you'll

> see emerging out of the various health care conversations that are

> taking place on the Hill right now.

>

> In other words, faceless bureaucrats in Washington -- not your family

> -- will decide whether your grandparents live or die.

>

> While our health care system is certainly imperfect -- because all

> humans are imperfect, including doctors, nurses, hospitals and

> insurance companies -- they are more perfect, more competent, more

> informed, more capable than all of the bureaucrats to whom they'll be

> forced to report: a bureaucracy that will make all decisions about

> your health care.<<

> =============

> http://news./s/ap/20090519/ap_on_re_us/us_forced_chemo

> Arrest ordered for mom of boy, 13, resisting chemo

>

> By AMY FORLITI, Associated Press Writer

> Tue May 19, 7:08 pm ET

>

> NEW ULM, Minn. – Authorities sought to arrest the mother of a 13-year-

> old boy with cancer who refuses chemotherapy after she fled with her

> son and missed a court hearing Tuesday on his welfare. A judge issued

> an arrest warrant and ordered that Daniel Hauser be placed in a

> foster home and be sent for an immediate examination by a pediatric

> oncologist so he can get treated for Hodgkins lymphoma.

> ===========

> As to mandatory vaccinations, etc.,

> http://snipurl.com/hguwd [Wash. Post]

> U.S. May Add Shots for Swine Flu to Fall Regimen

> By Kimberly Kindy and Ceci Connolly

> Washington Post Staff Writers

> Wednesday, May 6, 2009

>

> The Obama administration is considering an unprecedented fall

> vaccination campaign that could entail giving Americans three flu

> shots -- one to combat annual seasonal influenza and two targeted at

> the new swine flu virus spreading across the globe. >>The greater

> challenge will be tracking any adverse reactions as millions of

> Americans get multiple vaccinations in a matter of months this fall

> and winter. " There will be adverse effects to any

> vaccine. That's just science, " said Michael Hattwick, who ran the

> CDC's vaccine-tracking system during the last swine flu

> scare. Hattwick said a " real-time " tracking system

> would need to be established to provide constant updates to the CDC

> about adverse reactions. That information, he said, should include

> lot numbers for the vaccines so health officials can trace each side

> effect to the manufacturer and the date of production. Routine flu

> vaccinations are not traced with such precision because reporting is

> voluntary and often delayed, Hattwick said. " In a

> regular seasonal flu, you get three vaccines. Adding an additional

> one should not present a problem, " Fauci said. A record-keeping

> system would also need to be devised to track which doses patients

> have received, health experts said.<<

>

> =========

>

> http://us-constitutionalist.blogspot.com/2009/05/swine-flu-or-fda-

> which-is-more.html

> MONDAY, MAY 4, 2009

> Swine Flu or the FDA: Which Is More Dangerous to Your Health?

> By John W. Whitehead - The Rutherford Institute - May 4, 2009

>

> In a 2005 article in the Village Voice entitled " Capitalizing on the

> Flu, " James Ridgeway predicted that a " flu pandemic would spark

> enough fear to make it a greed pandemic. " As Ridgeway observed, " With

> a worldwide market estimated at more than $1 billion, there's big

> money in a flu plague. " In fact, the pharmaceutical industry has gone

> to great lengths through its lobbying and government contracts to

> ensure that it will get a good piece of the plague pie. Now with the

> swine flu set to become a global pandemic, Big Pharma is raking it in.

>

> >>First approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in

> 1999, Tamiflu was promoted as a drug that could significantly reduce

> the length and severity of influenza. These claims even prompted the

> U.S. government to purchase 20 million doses of Tamiflu--at a cost of

> $2 billion--in the event that a bird flu pandemic occurred. The

> Pentagon followed suit, paying a whopping $58 million in July 2005

> for treatments of U.S. troops around the

> world. However, problems with Tamiflu had

> already begun to surface as early as 2004 when it was alleged that

> the drug was causing some of its users to manifest very unusual

> behavior. For example, during the 2004 and 2005 flu seasons, two

> teenage boys committed suicide within hours of taking Tamiflu. The 17-

> year-old jumped in front of a large truck on a busy road after

> walking outside his house barefoot and in pajamas during a snowstorm.

> The 14-year-old jumped to his death from the balcony of a ninth-floor

> flat. Later, a teenage girl was narrowly prevented from jumping to

> her death from a window within days of starting a course of the flu

> drug. By November 2005, it had been reported that 12 Japanese

> children had died while on the drug and others had experienced

> hallucinations, encephalitis and other symptoms. Despite

> these alarming reports, the FDA opted not to issue a warning about

> the drug's potential for causing abnormal behavior. Instead, the FDA

> issued a warning about Tamiflu's potential for producing skin rashes.

> It wasn't until reports surfaced of more than 100 new cases of

> delirium, hallucinations and other abnormal psychiatric behavior in

> children treated with Tamiflu that the FDA changed course and

> required Roche, the Swiss company that makes the drug, to include a

> warning label cautioning patients, doctors and parents to look out

> for strange behavior in anyone taking the

> drug. However, Tamiflu is not the only

> drug to be suspected of having psychiatric side effects. There have

> been a disconcerting number of drugs which, although cleared by the

> FDA for use in treating epilepsy, asthma, influenza, obesity and

> smoking, are now believed to contribute to suicidal

> behavior.<< >>Certainly, this collusion

> between the pharmaceutical industry and the government should come as

> no surprise to anyone who keeps up with the news and the rampant

> corruption in the halls of Congress. But there are dire ramifications

> from Big Pharma's stranglehold on the U.S. government. As James

> Ridgeway writes in his recent article in Mother Jones, " Swine Flu:

> Bringing Home the Bacon, " there are " winners as well as losers in

> every high-profile outbreak of infectious disease. First and foremost

> among them, of course, is Big Pharma, which can always be counted on

> to have its hand out wherever human misery presents an opportunity to

> rake in some cash. " >>Clearly, Big Pharma are the winners

> here. Stock prices for pharmaceutical companies involved in the

> production of Tamiflu and Relenza have already jumped dramatically.

> And investors are already salivating at the prospect of the

> government insuring against future outbreaks by increasing its

> stockpiles of the drugs, as well as spending more on grants and

> funding for research.

>

>

> Note: If you'd like more info about the toxicity of Tamiflu and/or

> other " flu vaccines " , just let me know, there are plenty of reports

> about it - vl]

>

> =========

>

> http://www.physorg.com/news159440823.html

> Tamiflu 'may be tied to abnormal behavior'

> April 20th, 2009 The Yomiuri Shimbun

>

> Influenza patients between ages 10 and 17 who took Tamiflu were 54

> percent more likely to exhibit serious abnormal behavior than those

> who did not take the antiflu drug, according to a final report,

> released Saturday, from a Japanese Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry

> research team. ==========

> http://www.prisonplanet.com/school-mass-vaccination-drill-in-

> alaska.html#comment-347098

>

> School Mass Vaccination Drill In Alaska

>

> KTUU.com

> Friday, May 1, 2009

>

>

> ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska health officials and the Anchorage School

> District teamed up Wednesday to prepare for a worst case scenario by

> practicing a mass dispensing of vaccines.

> ==========

> http://www.infowars.com/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-

> massachusetts-senate/

> Swine Flu Martial Law Bill Clears Massachusetts Senate

> Infowars

> April 29, 2009

> It took corporate media swine flu hysteria to ram through a martial

> law bill in Massachusetts. S18 gives the Governor the power to

> authorize the deployment and use of force to distribute supplies and

> materials and local authorities will be allowed to enter private

> residences for investigation and to quarantine individuals.

>

>

> The Associated Press reports:

> The Massachusetts Senate has unanimously passed a pandemic flu

> preparation bill that has languished in the Legislature before the

> recent swine flu outbreak.

> The 36-0 vote today sends the measure to the House. Both branches

> have taken it up in past years, but have not been able to agree on

> the details.

> The new Senate version would allow the public health commissioner —

> in a public health emergency — to close or evacuate buildings, enter

> private property for investigations, and quarantine individuals.

> The bill specifically mandates the following:

> (1) to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into

> and investigation of the premises;

> (2) to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to

> decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated any building or facility,

> and to allow the reopening of the building or facility when the

> danger has ended;

> (3) to decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated, or to destroy any

> material;

> (4) to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons;

> (5) to require a health care facility to provide services or the use

> of its facility, or to transfer the management and supervision of the

> health care facility to the department or to a local public health

> authority;

> (6) to control ingress to and egress from any stricken or threatened

> public area, and the movement of persons and materials within the area;

> (7) to adopt and enforce measures to provide for the safe disposal of

> infectious waste and human remains, provided that religious,

> cultural, family, and individual beliefs of the deceased person shall

> be followed to the extent possible when disposing of human remains,

> whenever that may be done without endangering the public health;

> (8) to procure, take immediate possession from any source, store, or

> distribute any anti-toxins, serums, vaccines, immunizing agents,

> antibiotics, and other pharmaceutical agents or medical supplies

> located within the commonwealth as may be necessary to respond to the

> emergency;

> (9) to require in-state health care providers to assist in the

> performance of vaccination, treatment, examination, or testing of any

> individual as a condition of licensure, authorization, or the ability

> to continue to function as a health care provider in the commonwealth

> Any person who knowingly violates an order of the commissioner or his

> or her designee, or of a local public health authority or its

> designee, given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection shall

> be punished by imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or by a fine

> of not more than one thousand dollars, or both.

> ==========

> Note:

> The way I see it, they'll keep beating the fear-mongering drums for a

> " pandemic " to start around September-October [when the labs will be

> ready with their " experimental vaccine, " ] so that if their A-H1N1

> doesn't kill enough of us [under the paragraph " Depopulation " ], the

> vaccine will.... Whoever knows the abominations they'll put in those

> vaccines!!!

> If we can't nip it in the bud, then those who refuse the

> *mandatory* vaccine will be " quarantined " [meaning incarcerated and

> given the vaccine anyhow].

> They are probably testing the waters right now to see how far they

> can go to mandate deadly poisons for 300 million people, in the US

> alone....

> =====

>

> In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is

> distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior

> interest in receiving the included information for research and

> educational purposes.

>