New Citizens Petition to Allow Aspartame in School Milk Products: FDA's Constant Violation of Law

[Guest guest]

Aspartame must have a PKU warning by law. You don't upgrade

standards by violating the law. The attack on the brains of our

children continues. Many schools have removed regular pop and now

sell only diet pop because of obesity when, in fact, its aspartame

and MSG causing the

obesity: http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_makes_you_fatter.htm Canada

has banned aspartame in grammar and middle

schools. http://www.mpwhi.com/report_on_aspartame_and_children.htm

 

Note the FDA has refused for over 6 years to answer my Citizens

Petition for ban, even though the law requires it be answered in 180

days. http://www.wnho.net/citizens_aspartame_petition.htm They have

also refused to answer an imminent health hazard amendment which must

be answered in a week or ten

days. http://www.wnho.net/amendment_to_citizens_petition.htm This

was over a year ago. But they are ready to answer a Citizens

Petition to violate the law.

 

It would seem to me that Congress should make this an issue! The

Fatal Drugs Allowed folks simply go too far. March is the last month

to answer another atrocity, allowing aspartame in yogurt unlabeled.

http://www.mpwhi.com/milkweed_yogurt_story_feb_2009.pdf and

http://www.mpwhi.com/yogurt_fda_hides_the_poison.htm

 

In the congressional record in l985 FDA toxicologist Dr. Adrian Gross

spoke out against the FDA violating another law:

 

 

On August 1, l985 the FDA's own toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told

Congress at least one of Searle's studies " has established beyond ANY

REASONABLE DOUBT that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors

in experimental animals and that this predisposition of it is of

extremely high significance. ... In view of these indications that

the cancer causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been

established WAY BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, one can ask: What is the

reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food

additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act? "

 

The Delaney Amendment makes it illegal to allow any residues of

cancer causing chemicals in foods. In his concluding testimony Gross

asked, " Given the cancer causing potential of aspartame how would the

FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame

as constituting an allowable daily intake or 'safe' level of it? Is

that position in effect not equivalent to setting a 'tolerance' for

this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA

itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health

of the public? " Congressional Record SID835:131 (August 1, l985)

 

Twenty four years later aspartame is still on the market. Dr. M.

Soffritti in the Ramazzini Study confirmed aspartame to be a

multipotential carcinogen. Then he did another study showing it only

takes a small amount of aspartame to cause cancer and it can be

passed on to the offspring of a pregnant woman if the baby

survives. Aspartame triggers birth defects and mental retardation,

and there is no warning on the

label. http://www.mpwhi.com/louis_elsas_testifying_to_congress.htm

Because the FDA violated the law consider the thousands who have died

from aspartame cancer including babies born with brain

tumors. Aspartame breaks down to Diketopiperazine, a brain tumor

agent. http://www.mpwhi.com/letter_to_cynthia_oshita.htm

 

The continual attacks against our children is horrifying. We've

heard about the sickness and death from Gardasil, and now these posts:

 

" My niece went to the doc for her physical to enter high school. She

was given the vaccine

Without parental consent too. I was sooooooooooooo angry.

 

~Amber "

 

and " Jane M wrote: My grandkids are scheduled for Monday for this -

my daughter is giving them the day off school - they only sent the

notice home today - minimal time for her to ring her friends and warn

them - the whole school should take the day off. So thanks for the

instant ammo - you're wonderful! "

 

Here is more information on this atrocity:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view & pageId=68454

 

Pass on as a warning to parents everywhere and the media. Send this

note to your congressman. Enough is enough! Who will have mercy on

our children but it isn't the FDA. Aspartame is also in many drugs

used to treat the problem it causes. For instance, aspartame is in

Maxalt for headache, and headache is #1 on the FDA list of 92

documented symptoms from aspartame including death. A study showed

that Maxalt with aspartame increased headaches but the manufacturer,

Merck, continues to use it.

 

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

770 242-2599

www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net

Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame

Aspartame Information List, www.mpwhi.com scroll down to banners

Aspartame medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, H. J.

Roberts, M.D., www.sunsentpress.com

Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com, by

neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D.

Aspartame Documentary: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.soundandfury.tv

 

 

New Citizens Petition to Allow Aspartame in School Milk Products

 

 

NMPF & IDFA request FDA to update its standards of identity for milk

IDFA and National Milk have filed a citizen's petition with the Food and

Drug Administration (FDA) requesting a modification of the standards for

milk and other dairy products to allow the use of non-nutritive sweeteners.

 

 

The bottom line, according to National Milks Chris Galen in Thursdays

broadcast, is that schools are increasingly trying to use food and

beverages that have reduced calorie content due to concern over the obesity

rate among kids.

 

 

 

In order for us to continue providing flavored milk to kids in schools, we

have to allow for what are called non nutritive sweeteners, Galen

explained; things that are not sugar or high fructose corn syrup.

 

 

 

They can be used to sweeten flavored milk and still be called milk, he

said, but if you use caloric substitutes like aspartame or sucralose,

things that many people use to sweeten coffee or tea, you cant put them in

milk and still call it milk. It doesn't meet current standards of identity.

 

 

 

NMPF and IDFA is asking the FDA to update its standards of identity for

milk to allow these sugar substitutes to be used because many schools have

a requirement that what they purchase must fall under the legal definition

of milk.

 

 

 

If you're using these caloric substitutes, you cant call it milk any more

under present guidelines, Galen explained, even though the substitutes are

safe and effective in making low calorie milk beverages available to kids

in schools.