French government has to face the cellphoneissue due to courts

[Guest guest]

Trespass against us! "To expose one's neighbour against his will to a certain risk, and not a hypothetical one .. constitutes in itself a public nuisance" Nanterre Superior Court, France. 2009The two recent court judgments that compel the mobile phone companies to take down existing phone masts have set off a real shock wave, invisible like the waves but very real in the microcosm of the pro-mobile establishment. Since apparently nobody saw it coming, the surprise looks more like panic, judging by the comments made this Wednesday by Martin Bouygues, head of Bouygues Telecom, who exclaimed: "The government has got to make a choice: do they want us to go on using mobile phones or not?" Is he exaggerating? Not necessarily. If Martin Bouygues can see anything of the future, he must have grasped that the whole issue might soon shift to another register; in fact it may soon be the criminal law that takes the place of civil law, as was clearly stipulated in the grounds for the decision in the Nanterre case. [judgement extract]It seems that the regulations issued by the WHO and by their in-house fixer Repacholi are also beginning to come apart at the seams, and that the whole system set up to present these network-friendly standards as adequate is crumbling in the face of the evidence. Might not these WHO recommendations, which are always quoted by the politicians and by the phone companies, one day come back to hit them in the face like a boomerang? In spite of the shameless efforts to keep them from being tampered with, which do no credit to the WHO, and to deny everything, as always in the face of real evidence the truth will eventually triumph. [scandalous WHO meeting in Melbourne with Bernard Veyret, a French Repacholi henchman, in the line-up.]So it's the Prime Minister who has donned the fireman's helmet in order to deal with the emergency and with the public's anxiety about the hazards of relay antennas, and has sent a letter to the Minister of Health with instructions to organize a "citizens' forum" (rounds table) as soon as possible. However he makes its limits clear: "to make a distinction between mobile telephones and relay antennas". Even more explicitly, on the health effects of radiation from relay antennas he declares: "the hypothesis of a health hazard for people living near mobile phone antennas cannot be upheld" in the present state of knowledge and "considering the low levels of exposure around these installations". He adds: "A precautionary approach seems justified" regarding the use of mobiles phones, even though "the expert opinions currently available do not make it possible to reach a definite conclusion on the potential link between the use of a mobile phone and the risk of cancer."In the light of all this it's hard to see how this "citizens' forum" (round table) will be able to "deal with all the issues head-on" as promised, with such a narrow margin of manoeuvre for the Ministers concerned, Mmes Roselyne Bachelot-Narquint, Chantale Jouanno et Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet.".Latest information (4 March 2009) Phone masts in France:rejection by the public is spreading, every day the media report an open crisis of confidence,and numerous cases against the phone operators have been brought to court. For the first time a serious act of sabotage has been committed on a Bouygues Telecom base station.The TV news programmes have carried reports from the Elysée palace, seat of the Presidency of the Republic, where at the end of today's meeting of the Council of Ministers, the Ministers made a point of defending the mobile phone operators and announced the upcoming "round table" meeting which, in the face of publicly expressed anxiety on the subject, will focus on the health problems resulting from the microwave radiation generated by phone masts and by mobile phones themselves.The Prime Minister François Fillon declared in support of his Ministers: "In the present state of scientific knowledge the hypothesis of a health hazard cannot be upheld." For their part the mobile phone companies, who have signed a commitment to provide coverage of the whole country, are asking the government to take a clear stand.Next-up Organisation is preparing a special edition with TV reports and an exclusive interview with Maître Siegfried Bielle, who is representing the plaintiffs in Châteauneuf-du-Pape.During the 2006 seminar in Brussels at the European Commission of SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) Jean-Claude Bouillet, director of the department concerned with radio frequencies and protection at Bouygues Telecom, declared:"Every morning the first thing we do here at Bouygues Telecom is read the Next-up news of the day."We can therefore assume that the staff of Bouygues Telecom are fully aware of the current problems over relay antennas, and that in fact with the upcoming "relay antenna round table" it should be at the centre of their concerns: not, as some might think, so they can reduce the artificial microwave radiation of the public, but so they can set about getting permission to irradiate them even more.The term "mobile telephone" employed by NKM does not represent the truth, because what is being proposed is actually a private commercial operation to introduce the Mobile Visiophone (VM), also called Personal Mobile Television (TMP), using UMTS frequencies of 3G, 3.5G or 4G, which is a totally different matter. On top of that, the energy demands causing environmental pollution from artificial hyper-frequency microwave radiation will be increased by a phenomenal amount!NKM poses a problem: Here's why! (Fr)NKM says that she envisages as a possible way forward the sharing of relay antennas, that's to say that several networks would make use of the same phone masts. The point of this is "visual concealment" from the public of the increase in carrier frequencies and the number of new antennas, notably with the arrival of a fourth network.In fact this "round table" is no more than a mirage, since even if the proposed sharing of phone masts is agreed (which is far from likely) and the current number of masts is reduced, the Minister is apparently willing to let the networks add whatever antennas they wish to the remaining masts. Thus their operating frequencies would be multiplied many times over, while the public is fooled into thinking that the radiation hazards from them are being reduced.Consequently, it is clear that the health situation will only get worse. So what needs to be organised urgently is not a "relay antenna round table" (Grenelle) with people whose sole aim is to launch a commercial operation that will let them increase the radiation of the public even more, but a "round table" of responsible people focused on ways to make this technology compatible with human health and the environment.If NKM's attitude is causing a problem in the present situation, we have to say, considering her previous track record, that her actions to date and her fine words that achieve nothing are completely inadequate in the face of the catastrophic health scenario that is unfolding.The "round table on mobile telephony" will change nothing. Moreover it is highly probable that NKM and all the other players will soon be faced by the reality of sentences passed not by the civil courts but by the criminal courts. Thanks to donations that are coming in we shall soon be bringing cases to court based on health evidence, in order to find out the truth. We hope that this "salutary electric shock" will come about as soon as possible.Ministers are obliged by the responsibilities of their office to do certain things. Have any of them ever thought of finding out (via independent experts) whether continuous irradiation of 10,000,000 µW/m² in the Visiophone UMTS 3G microwave frequency (the famous statutory limit of 61V/m set by the decree 2002-775), is compatible with human health? Nowadays we are realising that more and more people are becoming EHS and "dropping out". The public are beginning to discover the disastrously damaging effects of artificial microwave radiation, and the hidden truth of this new kind of environmental pollution is finally being revealed in broad daylight!Bouygues Telecom "not short of insolence"The red thread of the policy that aims first and foremost to make a profit can be traced through all levels of decision-making on the issue of mobile telephony, thus it is not surprising to see that nothing gets in the way of a phone company's determination to expand, even when it is confronted by the law and by very real consequences.Bouygues Telecom was summoned to a hearing before the Tribunal de Grande Instance (District Court) in Nanterre, which took place on 4 June 2008. After due consideration the Court's judgement was pronounced on 18 September 2008. Bouygues Telecom appealed and the hearing took place on 7 January 2009 before the Appeal Court in Versailles. Eventually the final judgement was announced by said Court in their decree No. 68 of 4 February 2009.What was seen to be happening during this period to the base station (BST) and relay antennas belonging to Bouygues Telecom, the defendant in the aforesaid hearings in the local court and on appeal? While the TGI of Nanterre were considering the sentence, during the second half of July 2008 to be precise, Bouygues Telecom carried out some significant changes to the base station by adding 3 UMTS (3G) frequencies to the existing 2 GSM 900 MHz frequencies.This work considerably increased the carrying capacities of the BST, in fact more than doubled them. We did not take any measurements to check whether the UMTS frequencies were activated.Even though this is not in itself illegal, since Bouygues Telecom had the necessary permits in 08/08/2008, nevertheless by doing this the phone company showed the world that it is "not short of insolence"!This story reveals a great deal, and even if the UMTS connections were not activated (which remains to be proved), it is entirely justifiable to see it as a total lack of respect for the legal procedures (the consideration of the sentence) going on during the period in question. It all goes to show that nothing stands in the way of the determination to impose more and more artificial microwave radiation on the public in order to meet the demands of a money-making enterprise.-----------------------Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UKVaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htmVaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes March 18 & 19