Guest guest Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 - leslie o Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:16 PMThe Dirty Truth About FACEBOOKThe Dirty Truth About "Facebook"Please pass along. IMPORTANT SHORT VIDEO: http://blip.tv/file/1613641«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»Paranormal_Research - Scientific Data, Health Conspiracies & Anything Strange Paranormal_ResearchSubscribe:... Paranormal_Research- GREAT VACATION RENTAL ON THE LAKE: www.vacationhomerentals.com/39833 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 I wasn't surprised, but this video is no longer available. CENSORSHIP by the media?--- On Sat, 2/21/09, M.M. <MedResearch121 wrote: M.M. <MedResearch121 The Dirty Truth About FACEBOOKSaturday, February 21, 2009, 10:38 PM - leslie o Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:16 PM The Dirty Truth About FACEBOOK The Dirty Truth About "Facebook" Please pass along. IMPORTANT SHORT VIDEO: http://blip.tv/file/1613641«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»Paranormal_Research - Scientific Data, Health Conspiracies & Anything Strange Paranormal_ResearchSubscribe:... Paranormal_Research- GREAT VACATION RENTAL ON THE LAKE: www.vacationhomerentals.com/39833 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 Try this one Tony: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMWz3G_gPhU & feature=related At 08:14 AM 1/03/2009, you wrote: I wasn't surprised, but this video is no longer available. CENSORSHIP by the media? --- On Sat, 2/21/09, M.M. <MedResearch121 wrote: M.M. <MedResearch121 The Dirty Truth About FACEBOOK Saturday, February 21, 2009, 10:38 PM - leslie o Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:16 PM The Dirty Truth About FACEBOOK The Dirty Truth About " Facebook " Please pass along. IMPORTANT SHORT VIDEO: http://blip.tv/file/1613641 «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤» Paranormal_Research - Scientific Data, Health Conspiracies & Anything Strange Paranormal_Research Subscribe:... Paranormal_Research- GREAT VACATION RENTAL ON THE LAKE: www.vacationhomerentals.com/39833 avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090228-0, 28/02/2009 Tested on: 1/03/2009 8:18:11 AM avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090228-0, 28/02/2009Tested on: 1/03/2009 8:40:23 AMavast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I too am very wary about joining facebook I saw the video a few weeks ago A friend has been trying to pursuade me that FACEBOOK have fixed all their issues......... I am cynical..... so I went looking and this is what I found so far. Facebook has reverted to its old terms of service after a backlash from users. Over the weekend a ruckus ensued after it was discovered that Facebook changed two sentences to its terms of service. Originally, Facebook allowed users to delete all of their uploaded content and walk away with only archived copies left behind. That clause disappeared meaning that Facebook could continue to use your content after you quit. Jennifer Leggio: Facebook faces up to controversy, reverts TOS, turns to users for input Enter the hubbub. Groups against Facebook surfaced (on Facebook of course). Privacy advocates screamed. The problem: Facebook tweaked its terms without any heads up and gave itself broad rights over user content. Facebook retreated a day later. In a blog post, Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg said: A couple of weeks ago, we revised our terms of use hoping to clarify some parts for our users. Over the past couple of days, we received a lot of questions and comments about the changes and what they mean for people and their information. Based on this feedback, we have decided to return to our previous terms of use while we resolve the issues that people have raised. Many of us at Facebook spent most of today discussing how best to move forward. One approach would have been to quickly amend the new terms with new language to clarify our positions further. Another approach was simply to revert to our old terms while we begin working on our next version. As we thought through this, we reached out to respected organizations to get their input. Going forward, we’ve decided to take a new approach towards developing our terms. We concluded that returning to our previous terms was the right thing for now. The key words there are “for now.” Zuckerberg said that the next version of the TOS will have a “substantial revision.” However, users will have a say in the crafting of the privacy policy. Overall, this approach is better. Facebook has to give users a heads up on privacy changes. While we’re pondering a new TOS and privacy changes here’s what needs to happen everywhere: Privacy policies need to be written in English; Privacy policies need a nutrition label of sorts so I know what’s going on at a glance; Users need to realize they have very little privacy rights in the first place; But users should be given a heads up to privacy policy changes and be allowed to opt out in a certain window. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.