OBAMA AND THE TROIKA (Part Two)

[Guest guest]

1 MedicalConspiracies

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Good Morning -- BroJon Readers !! Here's the latest edition of

  BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE

  DAILY DIGEST

MONDAY JANUARY 19, 2009

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

" We'll know our disinformation program is complete when

everything the American public believes is false. "

-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

OBAMA AND THE TROIKA (Part Two)

 

 

This issue of the Digest is one of the most difficult things I have tried to

write. That's why it has been months since I have written a Daily Digest.

There have been a number of reasons. First, since I was born in December, I am

a Winter Person. As I described earlier, a Winter Person has difficulty

sleeping and maintaining normal circadian sleep/wake cycles in November,

December and January -- so doing research during that time is difficult.

Secondly, the last three months, I have been researching the “Meltdown” of the

American economy. But it is not just the American economy, it is the whole

world's economy. It is much worse elsewhere compared to America. To discover

what is happening around the world, I have watched and timed the markets of the

world, comparing market changes to the events occurring in the world. It is not

at all what you were told in the American news.

 

That is a 24 hours a day activity. Both the RTS market in Russia, and the Hong

Kong market in China do not keep New York daytime business hours. So to watch

them you must be awake and aware between one and six in the morning – which

messes up my sleep cycle – and I have been doing that for months. But if you

were aware in the middle of the night for the last three months, you would

notice that the “meltdown” is not an American phenomenon, but it actually has

affected other countries much worse than America. caused very serious damage to

the economies of Russia and China. Many times the Russian Micex (The Moscow

Interbank Currency Exchange) roughly equivalent to the American Federal Reserve

has frequently shut down completely for days and weeks at a time, as the Russian

stock market dives to near zero, mostly caused by the continuous drop in the

world price of oil. What is causing the continuous drop in oil prices? It is

actually economic warfare perpetrated by the American oil companies to put the

Russian oil companies like Gasprom, Rosneft, and Naftogas out of business. The

Russians are pissed and angry at the Americans, and getting ready to go to war

over the falling price of gas. And the Russians still have nukes, so a gas war

with Russia is not a pretty prospect. I remember “Troika gas wars” here in

California in the 1950's when the price of gas at the pump went from a normal of

about 20 cents a gallon sometimes during “gas wars” down to 10 and 5 cents a

gallon, in some cases even a penny per gallon. I remember completely filling up

my gas tank with Chevron gas for less than one dollar in 1960. The result was

that many other California gas companies like Texaco, Hudson, Shell were forced

out of business, and many no longer even exist in California. This same gas war

tactic in no longer in California, it is now occurring all across Russia and

even China.

 

Both countries have had in recent weeks, massive layoffs, worse than in America,

and a loss of money, causing the “middle class” in both countries to want to get

rid of their “ruling class” and this would cause disaffection and revolt. It

was stated by many economists several months ago, that if the cost of a barrel

of oil dropped below 50 dollars, the effect would be to “eliminate” the middle

class in Russia and China, and as a result even the middle class in America.

With the cost of a barrel now hanging around 35 dollars, the middle classes of

the world are facing extinction. Both governments in Russia and China are

facing revolt and revolution, from their once rich “middle class” but who have

have now lost their jobs, their houses, and their money so changing the

government seems the only “reasonable” action for them – this is called “Regime

Change in Russia and China.” This has the leaders of Russia and China running

scared from there own people. And scared nervous leaders can lead to

unpredictable results -- like World War. This is not reported in the American

press, but is now a constant headline in Russia and China.

 

This is the real purpose of the economic “meltdown,” but none of this is ever

reported in the American “Troika-controlled” news media – since the “meltdown”

was purposely created by the Troika. But in America this need for “Regime

Change” means getting rid of Bush and putting Obama into power. That is part of

the Troika Plan – but as you will soon see is also means getting rid of Obama.

That is the part which I don't like. I like Barack Obama, he is an “ideal”

candidate for President. But the Troika doesn't like him and and right after he

is inaugurated in two days, the news media will turn and he will quickly be

tossed out of office and forced to resign. This actually happened before in

1974, when the news media turned on the then most popular President, who had won

by a massive landslide, and President Nixon was forced to resign from office.

 

Six months ago, Hillary Clinton was asked about her Presidential experience,

since it appeared she had no experience in national politics and her answer was

she had “34 years of national political experience.” Amazingly, the News media

never figured out what she meant. They only complained that they could not get

access to the Clinton Presidential Library to look at her experience with the

Hillary Health plan, etc. But what does the Clinton Library have to do with 34

years ago? Nothing. So the News media was completely clueless. 34 years

before 2008 was 1974, not during the President Clinton years -- so not in the

Library.

 

What experience was Hillary referring to? In 1974, the new young attorney,

Hillary was among several attorneys assigned to the Congressional Watergate

committee investigating the Watergate Break-in. At that time, I was unemployed

so I watched the live TV coverage live every day, twice a day and gavel to

gavel. I also at that time was working with Mae Brussell on the Kennedy

assassination research, so I spent most of every evening on the phone with Mae

watching the replays of the hearings on the local PBS channel. I told Mae from

my morning notes what was about to happen in the hearings which was not

mentioned in the news.

 

That's when I discovered there were actually two “Troika controlled” attorneys

on the Watergate hearings legal staff. One one Hillary and the other was a

young Republican named Fred Thompson. It was Thomson who created the 1974

constitutional crisis by asking White house staffer Butterfield, “were there

recording devices in the Oval Office?” Butterfield's shocking/stunning answer

was, “Yes.” Thus began the yearlong quest to force Nixon through the Supreme

Court to give up the recorded tapes to the Congress. Which finally ended up

causing Nixon to resign from office. This was not politics as usual. It was a

Troika trick or hoax politics. The fact that Fred Thompson actually ran for

President in 2008, but later resorted to being a promoter or adviser for John

McCaine shows that even McCaine was and is Troika Controlled through his Troika

“babysitter” Fred Thompson. Most Americans only know Fred Thompson as an actor

on TV in 2003, but not so. And Troika “babysitters” are a common political

tool. Even General and President Dwight Eisenhower had a Troika “Babysitter” in

the 1950's. That babysitter's name was Richard Nixon. I'll explain more about

Troika babysitters later.

 

That Troika trick actually began four years earlier in November 1968, when

President-elect Nixon was invited to stay for several weeks in the apartments of

Governor Nelson Rockefeller in New York. The news media tried to examine this

strange event but was stonewalled and got no answer. The deal or trick was

simple. Nixon would stay in power as President if he, (1) finally completely

removed the US Dollar from the gold standard, (2) prolonged the war in Vietnam

for another 10 years, until the Rockefeller controlled Chevron Company had

completed its offshore oil survey in 1975, and (3) Nixon would fire his

Vice-President Spiro Agnew and appoint Nelson Rockefeller as a replacement,

using the new Rockefeller 25th Amendment to the Constitution, which Rockefeller

had passed in 1967. (What? Private citizens are now passing Amendments to the US

Constitution? Youbetcha, if you are as rich as Rockefeller, and can “buyoff”

the US Congress and 3/4th of the state legislatures. And all in several weeks

time. The 25 Amendment is a case in point.)

 

Apparently, Nixon agreed to Nelson Rockefeller's demands, but there carefully

was no record of that deal. But Nixon's actions in the next 8 years shows that

he was trying to comply but without actually signing over the government of the

United States to the Rockefeller family dynasty. But Nixon partially chickened

out and did not appoint Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice-President, instead he

appointed a Troika Compromise, Gerald Ford, who had shown his true Troika colors

during the Warren Commission investigation of the Kennedy Assassination. Later

it was Ford who pardoned Nixon, since Nixon had actually done nothing wrong or

criminal other than get on Nelson's “bad and wrong List”, by not obeying Troika

commands, so then Ford appointed Nelson Rockefeller as Vice-President, so Nelson

could complete the cover-up of Troika involvement in the Kennedy assassination

by convening a new Congressional commission to investigate assassinations.

 

I discussed all this during my daily phone calls with Mae Brussell in 1973, so

for me, none of this is new, it is simply Troika Politics as usual. Using this

knowledge, I recently predicted that what happened to Nixon in 1974, would also

happen to Barack Obama in 2008. But I missed my prediction, since Nelson

Rockefeller the fourth, AKA Senator Jay Rockefeller W Va, is more devious than I

thought, its a Rockefeller family trait since 1885. But the Troika Plan remains

in place. If something had happened to Obama after the November 4th elections,

then the elections would be voided and Republican John McCain would become

president. But that is Not the Troika Plan. So the Troika Plan was simply put

on hold until just after Obama's inauguration a day from now on Jan 20th. Then

the constitutional election laws would change and the Troika Plan, as with

Nixon, could be used by Hillary to drive Obama from office, and Obama would

appoint Hillary as his replacement. Why would Barack do that?

 

Well, Barack and Hillary are Frienemies (Friendly enemies) they are both

democrat Senators and they are often seen together in news media photos, it only

seems natural. In public Barack and Hillary seem cordial friends but in private

they probably hate each others guts, but that's the strange politics of

Frienemies. And that's how Troika Tricks are made to appear, events that are

easily explained in the Troika controlled News media as natural events. Such as

the Vietnam war -- A complete Troika Trick to make trillions of offshore oil

dollars for the Rockefeller Chevron company, and costing the US government

billions of dollars and the lives of 50 thousand American boys. That was the

Troika Plan for the 1950's - 1960'.

 

It was knowing that fact, which caused President Johnson to decide not to run

for President in 1968, and to cause Nixon to resign in 1974. What can a mere

President of the US do to fight a massive world-wide behemoth called the Troika,

other than resign in fear? Fear that if you don't go along with Troika orders

then you may get a Kennedy Haircut, meaning your head blown off. It's happened

before. It is about to happen again. You will hear about it splashed all over

the headlines in next weeks news. Thus what I am about to do is show you, not

past event stories reported in the press with links to that story, but

references to the Troika story as shown by thousands or millions of web pages

but still never reported by the main stream press. The main stream “Troika”

press considers it a non-story or a “lie” so it is never reported in American

newspapers or on TV. The main loser is you, who thinks you are informed, but

in fact you have been lied to by the Troika. Without respect to chronological

order or listed in any order of importance, here are recent stories in the last

several years which you never heard:

 

George Bush is a liar and is responsible for the costly and deadly war in Iraq.

Completely and provably False. You were told that there were weapons of mass

destruction in Iraq, but a search shows there were none. Again False. I heard

on the John Bachelor show on WABC New York, in 2003 an Army Intelligence officer

had observed hundreds of trucks driven into a ditch dug into the southern Iraqi

desert to the west near Basra, the truck contents were unloaded, then covered in

plastic and then the whole region was flooded to appear like a huge lake in the

desert. That's how tons of WMDs had just been hidden under a lake in Iraq near

the Euphrates River in 2002. The whole region was fenced off with signs saying

“no trespassing” And who put up the signs? The American CIA – the Troika. And

that was according to the American Army Intelligence officer in an eyewitness

report in 2003. Were WMDs ever discovered Iraq? Yes. Last year it was

reported on 350 thousand websites (do a search on “yellow cake Iraq”) and even

in the press, AP and Reuters, that 500 tons of “yellow cake” was found in Iraq,

and being sent to Canada for processing last summer in June 2008. BUT -- What

was NOT reported is what the heck is “yellow cake?”

 

Well, yellow cake is refined uranium ore. It is not processed or refined for

nuclear uses, but yellow cake has been known since the 1930's as a pure yellow

colored metal powder used to make yellow glaze on ceramics, or yellow ocher

color in oil paints. Thus yellow cake also has non-nuclear artistic uses. But

not 500 tons of it, which the US was shipping to Canada for nuclear enrichment

and then to be sold to the US nuclear program, enough raw material to make

hundreds of nuclear bombs. But that was something which neither Iraq nor Iran

could do, but the US/Canada could. Thus simply by not explaining what yellow

cake was, the news story of the non-discovery of tons of raw WMDs in Iraq made

George Bush look like a liar. And it was the story that “Bush lied and people

died” that was the basis for the winning Obama campaign of 2008. At no time did

the American CIA/Troika news media announce the discovery of 500 tons of WMDs in

Iraq. If they had, maybe the presidential election of 2008 might have been very

different.

 

Another related story is the news story of the Valerie Plame affair, and it was

a Bush assistant who leaked the name of Plame. That whole story is false and

designed to make Bush look bad. Plame was a low level clerk or agent in the CIA

who was tasked to hire her husband, ambassador Wilson to investigate if Saddam

Hussein was importing WMDs into Iraq. The CIA Troika purpose was to cover up

the fact that it was the CIA itself which was brokering the deal to sell yellow

cake from Niger to Saddam, through Libya. But Ambassador Wilson was not a

nuclear scientist who didn't know Yellow Cake from Cheesecake. I heard a radio

interview with Wilson in 2003, and my assessment, Wilson was clueless, even

about the role his wife played in getting his CIA contract. So, Wilson falsely

reported the Iraqi rumors were false and Hussein was Not importing raw WMD

material into Iraq. The truth was actually Hussein WAS importing tons of yellow

cake from Niger, but Wilson never reported that. In fact it was discovered

late, in 2004, that tons of yellow cake were found in Libya, with Saddam

Hussein's address still on it. But the Troika news media never put two and two

together to show that Wilson and Plame were both lying to Congress and both

should be put in Jail, not Bush's aid Scooter Libby.

 

Another story closely related to that was the fact that the Iraq war has

continued on for 6 years. It was George Bush's war. False. The war, “as

directed by the Pentagon”, was actually over in two weeks, at low cost and very

few casualties. So then what happened? The war had actually been taken over by

the Troika for the last 6 years. Thus it was not a Bush War, it was a

Rockefeller Troika war and it had nothing to do with oil. It had to do with

world power and the collapse of the US economy which we are now only beginning

to see.

 

On May 1, 2003. Bush landed in a Navy S-3B Viking plane on the deck of the

carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. And still wearing a military flight suit Bush

announced “mission accomplished” saying the war was over. Several days ago, Jan

17 2009, Bush, in his last press conference, said that “photo-op” event was one

of his biggest mistakes in his 8 year administration. Wrong. The war actually

WAS over then, on May 1, 2003 after a two week invasion in April 2003. Bush's

big mistake was announcing that ambassador Paul Bremer would be the new “ruler”

in Iraq. What nobody noticed was the Paul Bremer was not just an ambassador, he

was 100 percent Troika, and Bush had just put him (Troika) in charge of the Iraq

war. That would be like putting Richard Nixon in charge of ending the war in

Vietnam, which then went on for another 8 years and cost 50 thousand American

lives and many more Vietnamese. In 2003, nobody in Washington had heard of Paul

Bremer. How could that be? And what's that got to do with Iraqi 40 years

later? Lets see.

 

A trip back in time shows that about the same time as Nixon. as president-elect,

went to stay in Nelson Rockefeller's apartments in New York, Nelson's close and

top legal advisor was Henry Kissinger. It was Kissinger, in 1973 who then went

with Nixon to China, and made many “sweetheart” energy deals with the Chinese,

which eventually lead to todays world economic meltdown. If Nelson Rockefeller

was Troika III, according to my chronology, then Henry Kissinger was Troika

IIIB, a Troika assistant for Nelson. and the Kissinger and Associates Inc.--New

York offices became the home of Troika IIIB. What nobody noticed in 2003, was

that Paul Bremer had been working in Kissinger's office, and was appointed as

an ambassador to somewhere based on his friendship to Secretary of State Henry

Kissinger.

 

And by 2003 ambassador Bremer had become the president or head of Kissinger and

Associates, (Kissinger was entering his quiet retirement years as a frequent

news commentator/Troika liar on FoxNews, while Bremer was left to run the world

on his own) thus making Paul Bremer, Troika IIIC. If Bush made any mistake in

2003 it was appointing the “unknown” ambassador Paul Bremer to head Iraq and to

take control of the war away from Bush and the Pentagon and hand it over to the

Troika. At that point all hell broke loose in Iraq and cost the lives of many

Americans in Iraq since then. The news story about who was Paul Bremer was never

reported, and still remains a complete mystery until I just now told you in the

Brojon Digest.

 

You may remember Paul Bremer from his frequent TV appearances. After the army

found Saddam Hussein hiding in a hole in Iraq it was Paul Bremer who announced

proudly on TV “We found him.” Shortly after that Paul Bremer just disappeared.

What happened to Bremer? The army and the Pentagon had just figured out that

Paul Bremer was not working for America, he worked for Kissinger and Associates

as Troika IIIC. The rumor leaked out that the Pentagon (meaning DIA, JAG, or

NCIS) had “put out a hit on Bremer,” as if he were Troika agent Bin Laden or

something. Then a strange thing happened.

 

Bremer gave his public goodbye speech in Iraq in 2004, then was supposed to

board the Presidential plane and head for America as a hero. But instead of

entering the Presidential Boeing 747, he walked around the big plane and

instead suddenly boarded a small Lear Jet, probably a small CIA or Troika

contractor plane and instead of going to America and Washington, he took a fast

short hop just across the Iraqi border and landed in nearby Jordan. And since

then, Paul Bremer has been persona non-grata in the news. He is not connected

to any government. After Bremer's leaving Iraq, I have found no web pages

listing Bremer as even being alive. I hope Kissinger is still paying his

protege, or Paul Bremer is permanently out of a job. He should be arrested and

sentenced, or whatever the Pentagon and the DIA, JAG, or NCIS was trying to do

to him in 2004.

 

Beside using false Troika information about George Bush and the Iraqi war, Obama

has many other campaign problems which will all come to a head in the next

several days. The biggest problem facing Obama is the little issue of where he

was born. Was he born in Hawaii, as he and his campaign claim since 2006. Or

was he actually born in Kenya, Africa like all the members of his family,

including older and younger bros and sisters and aunts and uncles. Even his

maternal Grandmother claimed in June 2008, “whats all the fuss about Barry's

(Barack's) certificate, I watched him being born in the hospital here in Kenya.”

 

If he is born in Kenya, he is not a natural-born American and must resign the

Presidency. In 1961 when Obama was born, Kenya was a British protectorate, so

Obama is actually a British citizen. But can a popular charismatic British

citizen, like Tony Blair, become an American president, even if elected by the

American public. NO. The US constitution requires that a president must be born

in the US and not be born somewhere else and then later be given citizenship

sometime after birth. Strangely, the Republican John McCain has the same

problem, he was born in Panama, not the US. That's why McCain could never bring

up the obvious Obama birth certificate issue during the 2008 campaign, since the

counter argument would be that McCain was also not born in the US.

 

Many people thought that McCain was born on the military base called the Panama

Canal Zone, and so legally it was part of America. But hold on. McCain's

father was Admiral of the Pacific Fleet, not a small or lowly position in the

Navy . So I find it hard to believe that McCain was born in a small MASH

hospital on a military base in the Canal Zone. Rather the Admiral would send

his wife to the largest nearby hospital in Panama with all the latest medical

technology. But that would be outside the Canal Zone. I have not seen McCain's

birth certificate either, which would prove he was born in America.

 

I would assume that's why McCain was chosen as a Republican candidate since

Hillary could easily dismiss him as president. Thus both Obama and McCain were

carefully chosen by the Troika for the hoaxed 2008 elections, as equally not

qualified to become president – and thus regardless of who won the popular vote,

Hillary could handily dismiss either one. During the Obama/McCain debates if

the birth issue ever came up, the debate would quickly devolve into sticking out

tongues at each other with, “Nyah-Nyah, my birth claim is bigger than yours.”

Fortunately we were spared having to watch that insanity, which is why the topic

never came up. That was the Troika Plan for the hoaxed 2008 elections in

America.

 

And what about Hillary and Obama. When did Hillary learn about Obama's birth

problem? Actually it was just about two weeks before the Democratic Convention,

about August 10, 2008. We know this from several documented news sources.

First, on August 1, 2008 democrat lawyer Philip Berg filed a lawsuit claiming no

birth certificate existed to prove Obama was a natural born citizen as required

by law. Also on the document was the fact that Berg had sent a copy to the head

of the Democrat Party, Howard Dean. We have no evidence that Dean then notified

Hillary nor any other Democrats. But we do have the strange incident of

Hillary bringing up the earlier maxim, “Obama is not electable” a statement made

by Hillary's mouthpiece and strategist Mark Penn as early as 2007. But for

Hillary to repeat that old statement on August 10, 2008 to her campaign workers

is curious. Earlier in 2007 when Hillary was ahead of Obama in the polls, the

“unelectable” comment was mere politics as usual. But for Hillary to repeat the

“unelectable” statement in August 2008 when Hillary was behind in the polls is

inexplicable, unless Hillary had already been informed by Howard Dean of the

pending birth certificate lawsuit. And even if Obama won the national election

on November 4th, he would be “unelectable” since as soon as he is inaugurated on

Jan 20, 2009. Hillary could use the same tactics she used on Nixon in 1974 to

hound Obama out of office, thus he was “unelectable.”

 

There have been since Phil Berg, on Aug 1, 2008 about 15 more lawsuits all

claiming Obama is not qualified to be President. Most suits were quashed by

the news media as nonsense, so most of the American public does not even know

that Obama has a serious legal problem which blocks him from ever becoming

President. But the Supreme Court finally has agreed, it will look at Obama's

birth certificate problem. But it was first put off until after the election in

November, and now even until right after the inauguration on Jan 23, 2009. So

you can expect that on this coming Friday, January 23, the shat will hit the

fin, as thousands of politicians in Washington all suddenly scramble to

rearrange their realities to the fact that Obama is not really an

" African-American " , as professed by such political experts as Oprah Winfrey.

He may look black, but he is only half-black, a mulatto, and he is not even

American, he is British by birth. What? So Obama is really a black-looking

Britisher. And not an " African-American " as everyone was made to believe. How

strange, who would have guessed?

 

So the reality of Obama is turned on its head, and Obama is Not Electable. And

if that were Obama's only problem, it might be forgivable given Barack's

charismatic popularity. But it is not. Two weeks from now a cascade of bad

news will suddenly hit the news media already planted by the Troika but not yet

published in the American news, a veritable flood of stories, aimed at Obama

and aided by Hillary. which for months have remained hidden from the public.

They were hidden from the American news media by being published in the foreign

press in places like Russia, but I follow the Russian press so the stories are

not hidden from me. But when added all together they will even force the

public to call for Obama's resignation. Thus even Hillary can seem to wash her

hands of the whole mess, and just let the public do the dirty house cleaning

while she walks in as the new President to save the public from “bad guy Obama's

nonsense.” It will seem all natural and normal, as do all Troika plans. But I

find them all disgusting, since I am a democrat and always have been since I was

old enough to vote. I like Barack Obama, but in the last year he has been

forced by the Troika news media, to lie in public to make him look like a liar

and a “Bad Guy.” He will soon be given the news media's “Bush treatment.” The

long laundry list of Obama's Troika dirty laundry is coming next...

 

 

Marshall Smith

Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette

newseditor

(or temporarily teddyspeaks )

 

 

 

To donate to the research work at BroJon Gazette go here:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations & business=admin%40brojon%2ec\

om & item_name=Emergency%20BroJon%20one%2dtime%20Donation & no_shipping=0 & no_note=1 & \

tax=0 & currency_code=USD & lc=US & bn=PP%2dDonationsBF & charset=UTF%2d8

 

 

To Subscribe to the Daily Digest go here:

http://www.brojon.org/digestform.html

Click here to find the live links to the full news stories in the Gazette -

http://www.brojon.com or brojon.org

 

 

*** Tell A Friend You Read About It In The Brother Jonathan Gazette ***

You can forward a copy of this Digest to a friend to let them know

what they can find in the latest edition of the Brother Jonathan Gazette.

==================================================

The BROJON DAILY DIGEST is published for readers and rs of the Brother

Jonathan Gazette.

Copyright © 2009 TeddySpeaks Foundation Inc.

Brother Jonathan Gazette -- All rights reserved.