Guest guest Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 1 MedicalConspiracies ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\ ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Good Morning -- BroJon Readers !! Here's the latest edition of BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE DAILY DIGEST MONDAY JANUARY 19, 2009 ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\ ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] " We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. " -- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OBAMA AND THE TROIKA (Part Two) This issue of the Digest is one of the most difficult things I have tried to write. That's why it has been months since I have written a Daily Digest. There have been a number of reasons. First, since I was born in December, I am a Winter Person. As I described earlier, a Winter Person has difficulty sleeping and maintaining normal circadian sleep/wake cycles in November, December and January -- so doing research during that time is difficult. Secondly, the last three months, I have been researching the “Meltdown” of the American economy. But it is not just the American economy, it is the whole world's economy. It is much worse elsewhere compared to America. To discover what is happening around the world, I have watched and timed the markets of the world, comparing market changes to the events occurring in the world. It is not at all what you were told in the American news. That is a 24 hours a day activity. Both the RTS market in Russia, and the Hong Kong market in China do not keep New York daytime business hours. So to watch them you must be awake and aware between one and six in the morning – which messes up my sleep cycle – and I have been doing that for months. But if you were aware in the middle of the night for the last three months, you would notice that the “meltdown” is not an American phenomenon, but it actually has affected other countries much worse than America. caused very serious damage to the economies of Russia and China. Many times the Russian Micex (The Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange) roughly equivalent to the American Federal Reserve has frequently shut down completely for days and weeks at a time, as the Russian stock market dives to near zero, mostly caused by the continuous drop in the world price of oil. What is causing the continuous drop in oil prices? It is actually economic warfare perpetrated by the American oil companies to put the Russian oil companies like Gasprom, Rosneft, and Naftogas out of business. The Russians are pissed and angry at the Americans, and getting ready to go to war over the falling price of gas. And the Russians still have nukes, so a gas war with Russia is not a pretty prospect. I remember “Troika gas wars” here in California in the 1950's when the price of gas at the pump went from a normal of about 20 cents a gallon sometimes during “gas wars” down to 10 and 5 cents a gallon, in some cases even a penny per gallon. I remember completely filling up my gas tank with Chevron gas for less than one dollar in 1960. The result was that many other California gas companies like Texaco, Hudson, Shell were forced out of business, and many no longer even exist in California. This same gas war tactic in no longer in California, it is now occurring all across Russia and even China. Both countries have had in recent weeks, massive layoffs, worse than in America, and a loss of money, causing the “middle class” in both countries to want to get rid of their “ruling class” and this would cause disaffection and revolt. It was stated by many economists several months ago, that if the cost of a barrel of oil dropped below 50 dollars, the effect would be to “eliminate” the middle class in Russia and China, and as a result even the middle class in America. With the cost of a barrel now hanging around 35 dollars, the middle classes of the world are facing extinction. Both governments in Russia and China are facing revolt and revolution, from their once rich “middle class” but who have have now lost their jobs, their houses, and their money so changing the government seems the only “reasonable” action for them – this is called “Regime Change in Russia and China.” This has the leaders of Russia and China running scared from there own people. And scared nervous leaders can lead to unpredictable results -- like World War. This is not reported in the American press, but is now a constant headline in Russia and China. This is the real purpose of the economic “meltdown,” but none of this is ever reported in the American “Troika-controlled” news media – since the “meltdown” was purposely created by the Troika. But in America this need for “Regime Change” means getting rid of Bush and putting Obama into power. That is part of the Troika Plan – but as you will soon see is also means getting rid of Obama. That is the part which I don't like. I like Barack Obama, he is an “ideal” candidate for President. But the Troika doesn't like him and and right after he is inaugurated in two days, the news media will turn and he will quickly be tossed out of office and forced to resign. This actually happened before in 1974, when the news media turned on the then most popular President, who had won by a massive landslide, and President Nixon was forced to resign from office. Six months ago, Hillary Clinton was asked about her Presidential experience, since it appeared she had no experience in national politics and her answer was she had “34 years of national political experience.” Amazingly, the News media never figured out what she meant. They only complained that they could not get access to the Clinton Presidential Library to look at her experience with the Hillary Health plan, etc. But what does the Clinton Library have to do with 34 years ago? Nothing. So the News media was completely clueless. 34 years before 2008 was 1974, not during the President Clinton years -- so not in the Library. What experience was Hillary referring to? In 1974, the new young attorney, Hillary was among several attorneys assigned to the Congressional Watergate committee investigating the Watergate Break-in. At that time, I was unemployed so I watched the live TV coverage live every day, twice a day and gavel to gavel. I also at that time was working with Mae Brussell on the Kennedy assassination research, so I spent most of every evening on the phone with Mae watching the replays of the hearings on the local PBS channel. I told Mae from my morning notes what was about to happen in the hearings which was not mentioned in the news. That's when I discovered there were actually two “Troika controlled” attorneys on the Watergate hearings legal staff. One one Hillary and the other was a young Republican named Fred Thompson. It was Thomson who created the 1974 constitutional crisis by asking White house staffer Butterfield, “were there recording devices in the Oval Office?” Butterfield's shocking/stunning answer was, “Yes.” Thus began the yearlong quest to force Nixon through the Supreme Court to give up the recorded tapes to the Congress. Which finally ended up causing Nixon to resign from office. This was not politics as usual. It was a Troika trick or hoax politics. The fact that Fred Thompson actually ran for President in 2008, but later resorted to being a promoter or adviser for John McCaine shows that even McCaine was and is Troika Controlled through his Troika “babysitter” Fred Thompson. Most Americans only know Fred Thompson as an actor on TV in 2003, but not so. And Troika “babysitters” are a common political tool. Even General and President Dwight Eisenhower had a Troika “Babysitter” in the 1950's. That babysitter's name was Richard Nixon. I'll explain more about Troika babysitters later. That Troika trick actually began four years earlier in November 1968, when President-elect Nixon was invited to stay for several weeks in the apartments of Governor Nelson Rockefeller in New York. The news media tried to examine this strange event but was stonewalled and got no answer. The deal or trick was simple. Nixon would stay in power as President if he, (1) finally completely removed the US Dollar from the gold standard, (2) prolonged the war in Vietnam for another 10 years, until the Rockefeller controlled Chevron Company had completed its offshore oil survey in 1975, and (3) Nixon would fire his Vice-President Spiro Agnew and appoint Nelson Rockefeller as a replacement, using the new Rockefeller 25th Amendment to the Constitution, which Rockefeller had passed in 1967. (What? Private citizens are now passing Amendments to the US Constitution? Youbetcha, if you are as rich as Rockefeller, and can “buyoff” the US Congress and 3/4th of the state legislatures. And all in several weeks time. The 25 Amendment is a case in point.) Apparently, Nixon agreed to Nelson Rockefeller's demands, but there carefully was no record of that deal. But Nixon's actions in the next 8 years shows that he was trying to comply but without actually signing over the government of the United States to the Rockefeller family dynasty. But Nixon partially chickened out and did not appoint Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice-President, instead he appointed a Troika Compromise, Gerald Ford, who had shown his true Troika colors during the Warren Commission investigation of the Kennedy Assassination. Later it was Ford who pardoned Nixon, since Nixon had actually done nothing wrong or criminal other than get on Nelson's “bad and wrong List”, by not obeying Troika commands, so then Ford appointed Nelson Rockefeller as Vice-President, so Nelson could complete the cover-up of Troika involvement in the Kennedy assassination by convening a new Congressional commission to investigate assassinations. I discussed all this during my daily phone calls with Mae Brussell in 1973, so for me, none of this is new, it is simply Troika Politics as usual. Using this knowledge, I recently predicted that what happened to Nixon in 1974, would also happen to Barack Obama in 2008. But I missed my prediction, since Nelson Rockefeller the fourth, AKA Senator Jay Rockefeller W Va, is more devious than I thought, its a Rockefeller family trait since 1885. But the Troika Plan remains in place. If something had happened to Obama after the November 4th elections, then the elections would be voided and Republican John McCain would become president. But that is Not the Troika Plan. So the Troika Plan was simply put on hold until just after Obama's inauguration a day from now on Jan 20th. Then the constitutional election laws would change and the Troika Plan, as with Nixon, could be used by Hillary to drive Obama from office, and Obama would appoint Hillary as his replacement. Why would Barack do that? Well, Barack and Hillary are Frienemies (Friendly enemies) they are both democrat Senators and they are often seen together in news media photos, it only seems natural. In public Barack and Hillary seem cordial friends but in private they probably hate each others guts, but that's the strange politics of Frienemies. And that's how Troika Tricks are made to appear, events that are easily explained in the Troika controlled News media as natural events. Such as the Vietnam war -- A complete Troika Trick to make trillions of offshore oil dollars for the Rockefeller Chevron company, and costing the US government billions of dollars and the lives of 50 thousand American boys. That was the Troika Plan for the 1950's - 1960'. It was knowing that fact, which caused President Johnson to decide not to run for President in 1968, and to cause Nixon to resign in 1974. What can a mere President of the US do to fight a massive world-wide behemoth called the Troika, other than resign in fear? Fear that if you don't go along with Troika orders then you may get a Kennedy Haircut, meaning your head blown off. It's happened before. It is about to happen again. You will hear about it splashed all over the headlines in next weeks news. Thus what I am about to do is show you, not past event stories reported in the press with links to that story, but references to the Troika story as shown by thousands or millions of web pages but still never reported by the main stream press. The main stream “Troika” press considers it a non-story or a “lie” so it is never reported in American newspapers or on TV. The main loser is you, who thinks you are informed, but in fact you have been lied to by the Troika. Without respect to chronological order or listed in any order of importance, here are recent stories in the last several years which you never heard: George Bush is a liar and is responsible for the costly and deadly war in Iraq. Completely and provably False. You were told that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but a search shows there were none. Again False. I heard on the John Bachelor show on WABC New York, in 2003 an Army Intelligence officer had observed hundreds of trucks driven into a ditch dug into the southern Iraqi desert to the west near Basra, the truck contents were unloaded, then covered in plastic and then the whole region was flooded to appear like a huge lake in the desert. That's how tons of WMDs had just been hidden under a lake in Iraq near the Euphrates River in 2002. The whole region was fenced off with signs saying “no trespassing” And who put up the signs? The American CIA – the Troika. And that was according to the American Army Intelligence officer in an eyewitness report in 2003. Were WMDs ever discovered Iraq? Yes. Last year it was reported on 350 thousand websites (do a search on “yellow cake Iraq”) and even in the press, AP and Reuters, that 500 tons of “yellow cake” was found in Iraq, and being sent to Canada for processing last summer in June 2008. BUT -- What was NOT reported is what the heck is “yellow cake?” Well, yellow cake is refined uranium ore. It is not processed or refined for nuclear uses, but yellow cake has been known since the 1930's as a pure yellow colored metal powder used to make yellow glaze on ceramics, or yellow ocher color in oil paints. Thus yellow cake also has non-nuclear artistic uses. But not 500 tons of it, which the US was shipping to Canada for nuclear enrichment and then to be sold to the US nuclear program, enough raw material to make hundreds of nuclear bombs. But that was something which neither Iraq nor Iran could do, but the US/Canada could. Thus simply by not explaining what yellow cake was, the news story of the non-discovery of tons of raw WMDs in Iraq made George Bush look like a liar. And it was the story that “Bush lied and people died” that was the basis for the winning Obama campaign of 2008. At no time did the American CIA/Troika news media announce the discovery of 500 tons of WMDs in Iraq. If they had, maybe the presidential election of 2008 might have been very different. Another related story is the news story of the Valerie Plame affair, and it was a Bush assistant who leaked the name of Plame. That whole story is false and designed to make Bush look bad. Plame was a low level clerk or agent in the CIA who was tasked to hire her husband, ambassador Wilson to investigate if Saddam Hussein was importing WMDs into Iraq. The CIA Troika purpose was to cover up the fact that it was the CIA itself which was brokering the deal to sell yellow cake from Niger to Saddam, through Libya. But Ambassador Wilson was not a nuclear scientist who didn't know Yellow Cake from Cheesecake. I heard a radio interview with Wilson in 2003, and my assessment, Wilson was clueless, even about the role his wife played in getting his CIA contract. So, Wilson falsely reported the Iraqi rumors were false and Hussein was Not importing raw WMD material into Iraq. The truth was actually Hussein WAS importing tons of yellow cake from Niger, but Wilson never reported that. In fact it was discovered late, in 2004, that tons of yellow cake were found in Libya, with Saddam Hussein's address still on it. But the Troika news media never put two and two together to show that Wilson and Plame were both lying to Congress and both should be put in Jail, not Bush's aid Scooter Libby. Another story closely related to that was the fact that the Iraq war has continued on for 6 years. It was George Bush's war. False. The war, “as directed by the Pentagon”, was actually over in two weeks, at low cost and very few casualties. So then what happened? The war had actually been taken over by the Troika for the last 6 years. Thus it was not a Bush War, it was a Rockefeller Troika war and it had nothing to do with oil. It had to do with world power and the collapse of the US economy which we are now only beginning to see. On May 1, 2003. Bush landed in a Navy S-3B Viking plane on the deck of the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. And still wearing a military flight suit Bush announced “mission accomplished” saying the war was over. Several days ago, Jan 17 2009, Bush, in his last press conference, said that “photo-op” event was one of his biggest mistakes in his 8 year administration. Wrong. The war actually WAS over then, on May 1, 2003 after a two week invasion in April 2003. Bush's big mistake was announcing that ambassador Paul Bremer would be the new “ruler” in Iraq. What nobody noticed was the Paul Bremer was not just an ambassador, he was 100 percent Troika, and Bush had just put him (Troika) in charge of the Iraq war. That would be like putting Richard Nixon in charge of ending the war in Vietnam, which then went on for another 8 years and cost 50 thousand American lives and many more Vietnamese. In 2003, nobody in Washington had heard of Paul Bremer. How could that be? And what's that got to do with Iraqi 40 years later? Lets see. A trip back in time shows that about the same time as Nixon. as president-elect, went to stay in Nelson Rockefeller's apartments in New York, Nelson's close and top legal advisor was Henry Kissinger. It was Kissinger, in 1973 who then went with Nixon to China, and made many “sweetheart” energy deals with the Chinese, which eventually lead to todays world economic meltdown. If Nelson Rockefeller was Troika III, according to my chronology, then Henry Kissinger was Troika IIIB, a Troika assistant for Nelson. and the Kissinger and Associates Inc.--New York offices became the home of Troika IIIB. What nobody noticed in 2003, was that Paul Bremer had been working in Kissinger's office, and was appointed as an ambassador to somewhere based on his friendship to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. And by 2003 ambassador Bremer had become the president or head of Kissinger and Associates, (Kissinger was entering his quiet retirement years as a frequent news commentator/Troika liar on FoxNews, while Bremer was left to run the world on his own) thus making Paul Bremer, Troika IIIC. If Bush made any mistake in 2003 it was appointing the “unknown” ambassador Paul Bremer to head Iraq and to take control of the war away from Bush and the Pentagon and hand it over to the Troika. At that point all hell broke loose in Iraq and cost the lives of many Americans in Iraq since then. The news story about who was Paul Bremer was never reported, and still remains a complete mystery until I just now told you in the Brojon Digest. You may remember Paul Bremer from his frequent TV appearances. After the army found Saddam Hussein hiding in a hole in Iraq it was Paul Bremer who announced proudly on TV “We found him.” Shortly after that Paul Bremer just disappeared. What happened to Bremer? The army and the Pentagon had just figured out that Paul Bremer was not working for America, he worked for Kissinger and Associates as Troika IIIC. The rumor leaked out that the Pentagon (meaning DIA, JAG, or NCIS) had “put out a hit on Bremer,” as if he were Troika agent Bin Laden or something. Then a strange thing happened. Bremer gave his public goodbye speech in Iraq in 2004, then was supposed to board the Presidential plane and head for America as a hero. But instead of entering the Presidential Boeing 747, he walked around the big plane and instead suddenly boarded a small Lear Jet, probably a small CIA or Troika contractor plane and instead of going to America and Washington, he took a fast short hop just across the Iraqi border and landed in nearby Jordan. And since then, Paul Bremer has been persona non-grata in the news. He is not connected to any government. After Bremer's leaving Iraq, I have found no web pages listing Bremer as even being alive. I hope Kissinger is still paying his protege, or Paul Bremer is permanently out of a job. He should be arrested and sentenced, or whatever the Pentagon and the DIA, JAG, or NCIS was trying to do to him in 2004. Beside using false Troika information about George Bush and the Iraqi war, Obama has many other campaign problems which will all come to a head in the next several days. The biggest problem facing Obama is the little issue of where he was born. Was he born in Hawaii, as he and his campaign claim since 2006. Or was he actually born in Kenya, Africa like all the members of his family, including older and younger bros and sisters and aunts and uncles. Even his maternal Grandmother claimed in June 2008, “whats all the fuss about Barry's (Barack's) certificate, I watched him being born in the hospital here in Kenya.” If he is born in Kenya, he is not a natural-born American and must resign the Presidency. In 1961 when Obama was born, Kenya was a British protectorate, so Obama is actually a British citizen. But can a popular charismatic British citizen, like Tony Blair, become an American president, even if elected by the American public. NO. The US constitution requires that a president must be born in the US and not be born somewhere else and then later be given citizenship sometime after birth. Strangely, the Republican John McCain has the same problem, he was born in Panama, not the US. That's why McCain could never bring up the obvious Obama birth certificate issue during the 2008 campaign, since the counter argument would be that McCain was also not born in the US. Many people thought that McCain was born on the military base called the Panama Canal Zone, and so legally it was part of America. But hold on. McCain's father was Admiral of the Pacific Fleet, not a small or lowly position in the Navy . So I find it hard to believe that McCain was born in a small MASH hospital on a military base in the Canal Zone. Rather the Admiral would send his wife to the largest nearby hospital in Panama with all the latest medical technology. But that would be outside the Canal Zone. I have not seen McCain's birth certificate either, which would prove he was born in America. I would assume that's why McCain was chosen as a Republican candidate since Hillary could easily dismiss him as president. Thus both Obama and McCain were carefully chosen by the Troika for the hoaxed 2008 elections, as equally not qualified to become president – and thus regardless of who won the popular vote, Hillary could handily dismiss either one. During the Obama/McCain debates if the birth issue ever came up, the debate would quickly devolve into sticking out tongues at each other with, “Nyah-Nyah, my birth claim is bigger than yours.” Fortunately we were spared having to watch that insanity, which is why the topic never came up. That was the Troika Plan for the hoaxed 2008 elections in America. And what about Hillary and Obama. When did Hillary learn about Obama's birth problem? Actually it was just about two weeks before the Democratic Convention, about August 10, 2008. We know this from several documented news sources. First, on August 1, 2008 democrat lawyer Philip Berg filed a lawsuit claiming no birth certificate existed to prove Obama was a natural born citizen as required by law. Also on the document was the fact that Berg had sent a copy to the head of the Democrat Party, Howard Dean. We have no evidence that Dean then notified Hillary nor any other Democrats. But we do have the strange incident of Hillary bringing up the earlier maxim, “Obama is not electable” a statement made by Hillary's mouthpiece and strategist Mark Penn as early as 2007. But for Hillary to repeat that old statement on August 10, 2008 to her campaign workers is curious. Earlier in 2007 when Hillary was ahead of Obama in the polls, the “unelectable” comment was mere politics as usual. But for Hillary to repeat the “unelectable” statement in August 2008 when Hillary was behind in the polls is inexplicable, unless Hillary had already been informed by Howard Dean of the pending birth certificate lawsuit. And even if Obama won the national election on November 4th, he would be “unelectable” since as soon as he is inaugurated on Jan 20, 2009. Hillary could use the same tactics she used on Nixon in 1974 to hound Obama out of office, thus he was “unelectable.” There have been since Phil Berg, on Aug 1, 2008 about 15 more lawsuits all claiming Obama is not qualified to be President. Most suits were quashed by the news media as nonsense, so most of the American public does not even know that Obama has a serious legal problem which blocks him from ever becoming President. But the Supreme Court finally has agreed, it will look at Obama's birth certificate problem. But it was first put off until after the election in November, and now even until right after the inauguration on Jan 23, 2009. So you can expect that on this coming Friday, January 23, the shat will hit the fin, as thousands of politicians in Washington all suddenly scramble to rearrange their realities to the fact that Obama is not really an " African-American " , as professed by such political experts as Oprah Winfrey. He may look black, but he is only half-black, a mulatto, and he is not even American, he is British by birth. What? So Obama is really a black-looking Britisher. And not an " African-American " as everyone was made to believe. How strange, who would have guessed? So the reality of Obama is turned on its head, and Obama is Not Electable. And if that were Obama's only problem, it might be forgivable given Barack's charismatic popularity. But it is not. Two weeks from now a cascade of bad news will suddenly hit the news media already planted by the Troika but not yet published in the American news, a veritable flood of stories, aimed at Obama and aided by Hillary. which for months have remained hidden from the public. They were hidden from the American news media by being published in the foreign press in places like Russia, but I follow the Russian press so the stories are not hidden from me. But when added all together they will even force the public to call for Obama's resignation. Thus even Hillary can seem to wash her hands of the whole mess, and just let the public do the dirty house cleaning while she walks in as the new President to save the public from “bad guy Obama's nonsense.” It will seem all natural and normal, as do all Troika plans. But I find them all disgusting, since I am a democrat and always have been since I was old enough to vote. I like Barack Obama, but in the last year he has been forced by the Troika news media, to lie in public to make him look like a liar and a “Bad Guy.” He will soon be given the news media's “Bush treatment.” The long laundry list of Obama's Troika dirty laundry is coming next... Marshall Smith Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette newseditor (or temporarily teddyspeaks ) To donate to the research work at BroJon Gazette go here: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations & business=admin%40brojon%2ec\ om & item_name=Emergency%20BroJon%20one%2dtime%20Donation & no_shipping=0 & no_note=1 & \ tax=0 & currency_code=USD & lc=US & bn=PP%2dDonationsBF & charset=UTF%2d8 To Subscribe to the Daily Digest go here: http://www.brojon.org/digestform.html Click here to find the live links to the full news stories in the Gazette - http://www.brojon.com or brojon.org *** Tell A Friend You Read About It In The Brother Jonathan Gazette *** You can forward a copy of this Digest to a friend to let them know what they can find in the latest edition of the Brother Jonathan Gazette. ================================================== The BROJON DAILY DIGEST is published for readers and rs of the Brother Jonathan Gazette. Copyright © 2009 TeddySpeaks Foundation Inc. Brother Jonathan Gazette -- All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.