Rush!!! Urgent!!! Your help is needed NOW!!!

March 15, 2010

YOUR HELP IS

NEEDED NOW! Please do not ignore.

The U.S. Senate's version of the

'Health Care' bill is scheduled to be voted on by the U.S. House of

Representatives this week.

THIS BILL IS

LOADED WITH FUNDING FOR TOTALITARIAN PSYCHIATRIC SCREENING PROGRAMS!

Examples:

1) Funding for community based "Health Teams,"

which will establish a system of early identification and referral for

children at risk for developmental or behavioral problems.

2) Allocation of up to $5 billion every year for School Based Health Clinics to provide such services as: mental health assessments (screening), crisis intervention,

treatment, counseling and referral to emergency

psychiatric care.

3) Program for the Center for Disease Control to provide public health "interventions," screenings and clinical

referrals for individuals between 55 and 64 years of age.

4) The creation of a new "paraprofessional child and adolescent mental health worker." The legislation states that this is

"an individual who is not a mental or behavioral health

service professional, but who works at the first stage of

contact with children and families who are seeking mental or behavioral

health services."

The vote

looks like it will be very close and will be decided by those still 'on

the fence' and undecided. A 'surgical strike' is our best strategy.

A list of those House members publicly

known to be undecided (as of last week) are listed below with their

D.C. office phone numbers.

WE NEED

YOU TO CALL THE HOUSE MEMBERS BELOW:

These may

be the most important calls you ever make becasue of the long term

consequences of this bill.

Its easy:

1. Call the number next to the

Congressman's name. You can try this weekend (3/13)

and leave voice message but box mail be full. Call 3/15.

2. A receptionist will answer (or voice

mail).

3. Tell them you are calling to urge

the Congressman (woman) to vote NO (against) the Health Care bill.

4. Be civil, but tell them if the

Congressman votes yes you will be forced to support their opponent in

the next election.

5. FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO OTHERS.

IF LINES ARE BUSY PLEASE KEEP TRYING.

PLEASE TARGET TO HAVE ALL CONTACTED BY END OF DAY MONDAY 3/15.

THANKS!!!

Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao (202) 225-6636

State: Louisiana

Current position: Undecided. "Open" to supporting the

bill if abortion restrictions are strengthened, but would vote no

otherwise, according to an aide.

Rep. Bart Stupak 202-225-4735

State: Michigan

Current position: Leaning against. Says he and 11 other anti-abortion Democrats would

vote against the current bill if the abortion language is not changed.

Rep. Kurt Schrader (202) 225-5711

State: Oregon

Current position: Undecided. Amid pressure from the

National Republican Congressional Committee, Schrader's office said he had made no commitment to support

the final bill.

Rep. Shelly Berkley (202) 225-5965

State: Nevada

Current position: Leaning against. Told The New York Times that she was

"not inclined" to support the Senate version, which the House must pass

in the process toward final legislation.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (202) 225-2435

State: Arizona

Current position: Leaning against. A big public-option

supporter, he told Salon.com he would "lean toward" voting no,

saying the addition of Republican ideas was "a slap in the face."

Rep. Michael Arcuri (202) 225-3665

State: New York

Current position: Leaning against. Told his local paper that "there would

have to be some dramatic changes for me to change my position" and vote

yes on the final bill.

Rep. Bart Gordon 202-225-4231

State: Tennessee

Current position: Undecided. Released a statement Thursday saying

that while he initially voted against the bill because it did not do

enough to bring down costs, he is "pleased to see the discussion moving

in a more fiscally responsible direction now."

Rep. John Boccieri 202-225-3876

State: Ohio

Current position: Undecided. Told The Washington Post this week that

following last week's bipartisan summit, "I'm encouraged the proposal

contains important provisions to reduce fraud, waste and abuse and

reduce the deficit." Added that he was "hopeful" about achieving

quality, affordable health care. The original House legislation, he said at the time, did "not go far

enough" to reduce costs and get rid of waste, fraud and abuse.

Rep. Walt Minnick (202) 225-6611

State: Idaho

Current position: Wavering. His office had told The

Associated Press he was a definite no, but a spokesman later clarified to The Huffington Post

that he was back on the fence.

Rep. John Adler 202-225-4765

State: New Jersey

Current position: Undecided. Told The Wall Street Journal that the

Senate bill did a better job of containing costs than the House bill,

and indicated he would be willing to jeopardize his re-election to

support the final bill.

Rep. John Tanner (202) 225-4714

State: Tennessee

Current position: Undecided. Retiring this fall, he told The Wall Street Journal he was

taking "a wait-and-see approach."

Rep. Brian Baird 202-225-3536

State: Washington

Current position: Undecided. One of nine no-voters surveyed by The Associated Press who

say they are now undecided.

Rep. Suzanne Kosmas 202-225-2706

State: Florida