Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

MARRIED COUPLES PAY MORE THAN UNMARRIEDUNDER HEALTH BILL

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hello, right now, if I would leave my wife, my retirement income would increase immediately by $300. A month and. I would qualify for free medical. I would further be able to get food stamps and housing assistance. When all was said and done I would be able to survive at at least the same level with around $400. More per month. This is today NOW in the USA. I am almost 70 yrs old. By the way my wifes income is unemployment that is ending soon. It puts us above the level to qualify for anything by around $45. When her benifits run out I can apply for some things and we will see what happens. It is a trip because we cannot apply until after the money ends. This creates a gap that could cause us to be homeless. Without an address you cannot get any help. If your family takes you in they consider their income and your back to zero. Health problems and high medical expenses caused our delima in the first place. Great story right? I am not worried because our family will not put us out to pasture, it is just a fact of life I never considered along the way. Pastor MarvinSent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® Ramona <ramonaFri, 08 Jan 2010 16:29:44 -0600<herbal remedies >Re: {Herbal Remedies} MARRIED COUPLES PAY MORE THAN UNMARRIEDUNDER HEALTH BILL Lori, this is actually worse than you think. My parents lived in Norway for a year and a half. It is the most socialized country in Europe, with a tax rate of more than 80%. The marriage penalty is so entrenched that it is almost unheard of to be married.My parents were there in a religious capacity, and they had occasion to speak to people about the importance of marriage quite often. It floored them that the people had never heard of why it was of benefit to be married. They went to the Bible, but found that the state church of Norway had changed those inconvenient scriptures on adultery and fornication, so as to not make people feel guilty.In schools the children were taught to have sex early and indiscriminately. They were told while they might feel guilty at first, to keep it up and eventually the feelings of guilt would go away. (As one boy remarked, " They are telling me to kill my conscience! " ) It is no big deal to have children out of wedlock as day cares are mandated to be open at 6 am til 10 pm to accommodate any work schedules the parents might have. Government pays for it, so no need to pick up your children when you get off work, have time to relax and do what you want.I could go on, but I am not giving up my family and I have a one year old boy at my elbow demanding attention. But, this kind of thing started with the government taking care of the people and taking care of those poor people who are not married with marriage penalties. It is a severe blow to the morals of society.RamonaQuoting Lori Smith <homeschoolmom42 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>:>> This legislation, if passed, will further erode our moral fabric. > Marriage and family is the backbone of every great nation, and when > people stop marrying and begin to live together, you have a > weakening of the fabric of that nation. It seems as if Congress and > the the Senate is wanting to destroy marriage in America. This > legislation needs stopped. It is wrong and unfair to higher tax > those who are married and living withing the moral and legal codes > of our nation.>>>> Lori/Mom>>>>>> January 8, 2010>>> MARRIED COUPLES PAY MORE THAN UNMARRIED UNDER HEALTH BILL> Some married couples would pay thousands of dollars more for the > same health insurance coverage as unmarried people living together, > under the health insurance overhaul plan pending in Congress, says > the Wall Street Journal.>> The built-in " marriage penalty " in both House and Senate health care > bills has received scant attention. But for scores of low-income > and middle-income couples, it could mean a hike of $2,000 or more in > annual insurance premiums the moment they say " I do. " >>> The disparity comes about in part because subsidies for purchasing > health insurance under the plan from congressional Democrats are > pegged to federal poverty guidelines.> That has the effect of limiting subsidies for married couples with a > combined income, compared to if the individuals are single.> People who get their health insurance through an employer wouldn't > be affected.> Only people that buy subsidized insurance through new exchanges set > up by the legislation stand to be impacted.> About 17 million people would receive such subsidies in 2016 under > the House plan, the Congressional Budget Office estimates.> The bills cap the annual amount people making less than 400 percent > of the federal poverty level must pay for health insurance premiums, > ranging from 1.5 percent of income for the poorest to 11 percent at > the top end, under the House plan:>>> For an unmarried couple with income of $25,000 each, combined > premiums would be capped at $3,076 per year, under the House bill.> If the couple gets married, with a combined income of $50,000, their > annual premium cap jumps to $5,160 -- a " penalty " of $2,084.> The disparity is slightly smaller in the Senate version of health > care legislation, chiefly because premium subsidies in the House > bill are more targeted towards low-wage earners, says the Journal:>>> Under the Senate bill, a couple with $50,000 in combined income > would pay $3,450 in annual premiums if unmarried, and $5,100 if > married -- a difference of $1,650.> Republicans say the effect on married couples whose combined income > makes them ineligible for subsidies is even greater -- up to $5,000 > or more -- but that is more difficult to measure because it includes > assumptions about the price of insurance policies.> Source: Martin Vaughan, " Married Couples Pay More Than Unmarried > Under Health Bill, " Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2010.>> For text:>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126281943134818675.html>> AllThingsHome/>>>> " ...‘How will they learn to read?’ you ask, and my answer is > ‘Remember the lessons of Massachusetts.’ When children are given > whole lives instead of age-graded ones in cellblocks, they learn to > read, write, and do arithmetic with ease, if those things make sense > in the kind of life that unfolds around them. " – John Taylor Gatto>>>>>>>>>>________> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/ " Live in faith, not fear. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...