Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey

August 11, 2009

A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits. *** The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the papers in its support,

states in the Preliminary Injunction that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines. The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination

against that person's free will and free choice. The government will not allow any state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free choice. It is further ordered that the government shall not deny any constitutional rights to any person who has not received a flu vaccine, nor allow any doctor, company, or other party to deny any of these people services such as medical care, attending school, or similar services or freedoms, nor can the government allow any doctors, companies, or other parties, to deny any of these people their constitutional rights. The only exception to this, where a person who does not get a

flu vaccination might be denied certain services, shall be after it is shown in a court of law, with clear and convincing evidence, on an individual case-by-case basis, where due process and a right to a defense is allowed. Only then can a person be denied a particular service because the person did not receive a flu vaccine. *** Copies of the Vawter's actual files can be viewed at: http://www.safetylawsuits.com/compl...http://www.safetylawsuits.com/motio...http://www.safetylawsuits.com/preli...SOURCE: http://www.naturalnews.com/026818_vaccination_vaccines_flu_vaccine.htmlConstitution Party Condemns Possible Mandatory Vaccination - Unacceptable to Force Unsafe, Untested Vaccine on Americans - Constitution Party via Pitchengine.com - "All liberty-loving Americans should shudder at the WHO directives which state: 'During a pandemic, it may be necessary to overrule existing legislation or (individual) human rights. Examples are the enforcement of quarantine (overruling individual freedom of movement), use of privately owned buildings for hospitals, off-license use of drugs, compulsory vaccination or implementation of emergency shifts in essential

services. These decisions need a legal framework to ensure transparent assessment and justification of the measures that are being considered, and to ensure coherence with international legislation (International Health Regulations).'"

Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!

August 11, 2009

Thanks Bea for the info! We will not succumb!

CJ --- On Tue, 8/11/09, Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen wrote:

Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen{Herbal Remedies} Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jerseythink-outside-the-box Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2009, 11:21 AM

A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits. *** The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines. The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free choice. The government

will not allow any state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free choice. It is further ordered that the government shall not deny any constitutional rights to any person who has not received a flu vaccine, nor allow any doctor, company, or other party to deny any of these people services such as medical care, attending school, or similar services or freedoms, nor can the government allow any doctors, companies, or other parties, to deny any of these people their constitutional rights. The only exception to this, where a person who does not get a flu vaccination might be denied certain services, shall be after

it is shown in a court of law, with clear and convincing evidence, on an individual case-by-case basis, where due process and a right to a defense is allowed. Only then can a person be denied a particular service because the person did not receive a flu vaccine. *** Copies of the Vawter's actual files can be viewed at: http://www.safetyla wsuits.com/ compl...http://www.safetyla wsuits.com/ motio...http://www.safetyla wsuits.com/ preli...SOURCE: http://www.naturaln ews.com/026818_ vaccination_ vaccines_ flu_vaccine. htmlConstitution Party Condemns Possible Mandatory Vaccination - Unacceptable to Force Unsafe, Untested Vaccine on Americans - Constitution Party via Pitchengine. com - "All liberty-loving Americans should shudder at the WHO directives which state: 'During a pandemic, it may be necessary to overrule existing legislation or (individual) human rights. Examples are the enforcement of quarantine (overruling individual freedom of movement), use of privately owned buildings for hospitals, off-license use of drugs, compulsory vaccination or implementation of emergency shifts in

essential services. These decisions need a legal framework to ensure transparent assessment and justification of the measures that are being considered, and to ensure coherence with international legislation (International Health Regulations) .'"

Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!