'FLU' ACTION NEEDED--LAWYERS--EXPERTS--where are you?

[Guest guest]

We need to get seriously mobilized on this issue!!! Both Canada and the US!!

 

Lawyers, health workers--any experts---we have to put together a comprehensive package--a way of resisting this depopulation campaign!!!!! OUR CHILDREN ARE THE FRONT WAVE!!!

 

Excerpts:

"British researchers reported last week that targeting children first would protect not only them, but also unvaccinated adults".

 

"Under Canada's official pandemic plan, the entire population would ultimately be immunized against the H1N1 swine flu".

 

******************

 

The way I see it the next (probably 'mutated') wave will hit in the fall (which would normally be 'flu season' anyway--so they can really ramp it up)--by that time if the NWO depopulation agenda has its way---the 'laws' of forcing us will be in effect--along with the denial of any natural products with which we can protect ourselves. As we know similar laws of denial of 'Due Process' as well as wide open surveillance laws are being enacted as we speak in Canada, US UK and more----the usual suspects...

 

These vaccines arent even tested!!!!!!! Not that the ones that are--are any better...

 

What happened last time---

http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/cbs+60+minutes/video/x9mh9f_swine-flu-1976-propaganda_webcam

 

READ THIS!!! It's a good synopsis of the causes and effects--what is awaiting our children-- and all the poor f*ckers who fall for this depopulation move!!! Just ask the hundreds of thousands of war vets (guinea pigs) who are suffering from any number of debilitating diseases form vaccines and other murderous experiments!

 

Readying Americans for Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va & aid=13925

 

***********************

 

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1718981

Vaccinate Canadians under 40 and natives first: experts

Sharon Kirkey, Canwest News Service Published: Sunday, June 21, 2009

 

More On This Story

 

 

Canadian swine flu toll rises

 

Feds deny field hospital to reserve

 

Canada to step up flu vaccine research

 

 

 

Story tools presented by

 

 

Mike Cassese/ReutersHealth Minister Leona Aglukkaq watches researcher George Moussa test flu samples after announcing funding to speed up influenza research and test new vaccines against the H1N1 flu virus, Jun. 5, 2009.

 

Five-to-40-year-olds and Canada's aboriginal communities should be the first to get vaccinated against human swine flu, experts say as Canadian officials decide who gets priority for the flu shots.

Under Canada's official pandemic plan, the entire population would ultimately be immunized against the H1N1 swine flu.

But the vaccine will become available in batches, meaning the entire population can't be vaccinated at once. It might take four or five months to get all the vaccine we're going to get, during which time a second wave of swine flu may well be underway.

The Public Health Agency of Canada is working on a priority list, deciding where the first batches should go, and who should get the injections first. All provinces and territories would be expected to follow the national prioritization scheme.

Unlike normal seasonal flu, the H1N1 virus appears to be disproportionately infecting older children and young adults. So far the largest number of confirmed cases have occurred in people between the ages of five and 24.

"It doesn't mean they're all getting sick and need to be hospitalized, but they're getting significant illness," said Dr. Noni MacDonald, a leader in pediatric infectious diseases and a professor of pediatrics at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

British researchers reported last week that targeting children first would protect not only them, but also unvaccinated adults.

"Even if you are concerned about the elderly, who are often mentioned as another risk group, their main connection to the big pool of infection is often their grandchildren," said Dr. Thomas House of the University of Warwick.

But adults older than 64 don't appear to be at increased risk of H1N1-related complications so far in the outbreak. It's possible they have some antibodies against the virus.

As well, children "are known to be really important for transmitting flu," said Earl Brown, executive director of the Emerging Pathogens Research Centre at the University of Ottawa.

"They're important for the cycle of infection. They tend to be naive as far as not having flu antibodies in their system before. And really young kids, their immune systems aren't fully mature.

"Children tend to be hit, and they can be hit harder," Brown said. By immunizing children first, "you get to try to block spread, and protect a vulnerable group."

Gymnasiums would be used for mass school-based vaccination programs but experts say the harder to reach group will be the 18-to-30-year-olds.

"Some of them are in school, a lot of them are not," MacDonald said. "They're very much living in the moment and don't necessarily see themselves as being at risk. We need some fast thinking about how to reach those people."

She suggested booths could be set up outside bars for information and immunization.

"You've got to be creative about this and really think out of the box."

Canada's aboriginal communities also appear to be getting more serious infections. Crowded, poorly ventilated housing and poor access to high-quality running water and sanitization are some of the factors being blamed. Aboriginals also have higher rates of asthma, chronic lung disease, obesity and diabetes -- the very diseases early data suggests puts people at higher risk of life-threatening complications from swine flu.

The H1N1 vaccine will be a separate vaccine from the regular, annual flu shot. People will require two jabs, and possibly three, depending on how effective the vaccine is in producing immunity. The Public Health Agency of Canada says that no decisions have yet been made about who would get priority first.

One of the challenges will be getting people to agree to the shots. There will be limited information about any vaccine's safety before immunization campaigns are rolled out across the country.

"We usually do research in healthy adults before we do it in children, because this is a new vaccine, and you want to be sure that it's safe and effective before you give it to vulnerable populations, or populations who don't have full capacity to make an informed decision about getting it or not," said Dr. Joanne Langley, of Health Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization.

"There are pros and cons to putting [children] first."

Babies under six months of age are not vaccinated against flu.

Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Get it Now for Free!

[Guest guest]

I posted the below in another forum a few weeks back where someone was concerned about their child being vaccinated. I don't know about any "depopulation" strategy, but I'm open to the idea that it is possible.

 

It is not completely in sync with your post, but does hit the subject matter, so I'm re-posting it:

 

I have studied the law for over ten years now, both in college and personal study. Countless hours worth of intense study. As an attorney has stated on this matter: "The truth is, for most U.S. citizens, the law on vaccine religious exemptions is not clearly defined."THAT is where you start. Simply by asking the authority that claims you must get vaccinations to "show me the law requiring that me/my child be vaccinated."You then read any claimed law and see if it APPLIES to YOU. Run it by me if you need to, and I will explain how the words are being used and what they actually mean from a legal/lawful standpoint. Your perception of what they mean, versus what they're *actually* saying, are often two different things. This happens every day in law, because we're a nation ignorant of how the law actually works. You then make THEM prove that YOU fall within the definition of what that law

requires. Do NOT engage their argument; force THEM to prove their claim. They won't be able to do it, and the matter will disappear. There are tactics that handle this very effectively, I have direct experience with this locally. Case law is not "law." It applies ONLY to that specific case. A judge can not enact law from the bench, only the legislature has that authority. This crosses Separation of Powers doctrines. What often happens in many cases (I have seen it more times than you can imagine) is that judges will cite case law in an effort to convince the mover of the court that what they're asking cannot be granted because of such-and-such case. These cases are often completely unrelated to the motion, and the effort on the judiciary's part is accomplished then via your *consent* to their authority in rendering their decision, meaning that you accept their decision without challenge by

remaining silent on it. If you challenged it properly, you will often find reversals of these decisions.Everything is consent, consent, consent. What people don't understand is HOW they're giving that consent without realizing it. Assumption and presumption that is not challenged properly, remaining silent, etc.Simply ask them to show you the law. Then post the "law" that they show you, for everyone to see, contact me directly at my youtube channel, and I will address it here and there, and explain how it needs to be interpreted. There is absolutely no need to be even considering getting into an adversarial controversy on this topic (taking it to court) if you stop it at its inception properly, instead of allowing any branch of government to attempt to tell you what is and is not within your inherent rights. You assert those rights by understanding the nature of what THEY must prove that allegedly

makes you liable to their law.The problem is THEIRS...Do NOT make it YOURS.Thanks..........Tim, aka "facelessfatloss" on youtube"Right here, right Now."--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen wrote:

Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen{Herbal Remedies} 'FLU' ACTION NEEDED--LAWYERS--EXPERTS--where are you?think-outside-the-box Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 7:18 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We need to get seriously mobilized on this issue!!! Both Canada and the US!!

 

Lawyers, health workers--any experts---we have to put together a comprehensive package--a way of resisting this depopulation campaign!!!! ! OUR CHILDREN ARE THE FRONT WAVE!!!

 

Excerpts:

"British researchers reported last week that targeting children first would protect not only them, but also unvaccinated adults".

 

"Under Canada's official pandemic plan, the entire population would ultimately be immunized against the H1N1 swine flu".

 

************ ******

 

The way I see it the next (probably 'mutated') wave will hit in the fall (which would normally be 'flu season' anyway--so they can really ramp it up)--by that time if the NWO depopulation agenda has its way---the 'laws' of forcing us will be in effect--along with the denial of any natural products with which we can protect ourselves. As we know similar laws of denial of 'Due Process' as well as wide open surveillance laws are being enacted as we speak in Canada, US UK and more----the usual suspects...

 

These vaccines arent even tested!!!!!! ! Not that the ones that are--are any better...

 

What happened last time---

http://www.dailymot ion.com/relevanc e/search/ cbs+60+minutes/ video/x9mh9f_ swine-flu- 1976-propaganda_ webcam

 

READ THIS!!! It's a good synopsis of the causes and effects--what is awaiting our children-- and all the poor f*ckers who fall for this depopulation move!!! Just ask the hundreds of thousands of war vets (guinea pigs) who are suffering from any number of debilitating diseases form vaccines and other murderous experiments!

 

Readying Americans for Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations

http://globalresear ch.ca/index. php?context= va & aid=13925

 

************ ********* **

 

http://www.national post.com/ news/story. html?id=1718981

Vaccinate Canadians under 40 and natives first: experts

Sharon Kirkey, Canwest News Service Published: Sunday, June 21, 2009

 

More On This Story

 

 

Canadian swine flu toll rises

 

Feds deny field hospital to reserve

 

Canada to step up flu vaccine research

 

 

 

Story tools presented by

 

 

Mike Cassese/ReutersHealth Minister Leona Aglukkaq watches researcher George Moussa test flu samples after announcing funding to speed up influenza research and test new vaccines against the H1N1 flu virus, Jun. 5, 2009.

 

Five-to-40-year- olds and Canada's aboriginal communities should be the first to get vaccinated against human swine flu, experts say as Canadian officials decide who gets priority for the flu shots.

Under Canada's official pandemic plan, the entire population would ultimately be immunized against the H1N1 swine flu.

But the vaccine will become available in batches, meaning the entire population can't be vaccinated at once. It might take four or five months to get all the vaccine we're going to get, during which time a second wave of swine flu may well be underway.

The Public Health Agency of Canada is working on a priority list, deciding where the first batches should go, and who should get the injections first. All provinces and territories would be expected to follow the national prioritization scheme.

Unlike normal seasonal flu, the H1N1 virus appears to be disproportionately infecting older children and young adults. So far the largest number of confirmed cases have occurred in people between the ages of five and 24.

"It doesn't mean they're all getting sick and need to be hospitalized, but they're getting significant illness," said Dr. Noni MacDonald, a leader in pediatric infectious diseases and a professor of pediatrics at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

British researchers reported last week that targeting children first would protect not only them, but also unvaccinated adults.

"Even if you are concerned about the elderly, who are often mentioned as another risk group, their main connection to the big pool of infection is often their grandchildren, " said Dr. Thomas House of the University of Warwick.

But adults older than 64 don't appear to be at increased risk of H1N1-related complications so far in the outbreak. It's possible they have some antibodies against the virus.

As well, children "are known to be really important for transmitting flu," said Earl Brown, executive director of the Emerging Pathogens Research Centre at the University of Ottawa.

"They're important for the cycle of infection. They tend to be naive as far as not having flu antibodies in their system before. And really young kids, their immune systems aren't fully mature.

"Children tend to be hit, and they can be hit harder," Brown said. By immunizing children first, "you get to try to block spread, and protect a vulnerable group."

Gymnasiums would be used for mass school-based vaccination programs but experts say the harder to reach group will be the 18-to-30-year- olds.

"Some of them are in school, a lot of them are not," MacDonald said. "They're very much living in the moment and don't necessarily see themselves as being at risk. We need some fast thinking about how to reach those people."

She suggested booths could be set up outside bars for information and immunization.

"You've got to be creative about this and really think out of the box."

Canada's aboriginal communities also appear to be getting more serious infections. Crowded, poorly ventilated housing and poor access to high-quality running water and sanitization are some of the factors being blamed. Aboriginals also have higher rates of asthma, chronic lung disease, obesity and diabetes -- the very diseases early data suggests puts people at higher risk of life-threatening complications from swine flu.

The H1N1 vaccine will be a separate vaccine from the regular, annual flu shot. People will require two jabs, and possibly three, depending on how effective the vaccine is in producing immunity. The Public Health Agency of Canada says that no decisions have yet been made about who would get priority first.

One of the challenges will be getting people to agree to the shots. There will be limited information about any vaccine's safety before immunization campaigns are rolled out across the country.

"We usually do research in healthy adults before we do it in children, because this is a new vaccine, and you want to be sure that it's safe and effective before you give it to vulnerable populations, or populations who don't have full capacity to make an informed decision about getting it or not," said Dr. Joanne Langley, of Health Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization.

"There are pros and cons to putting [children] first."

Babies under six months of age are not vaccinated against flu.

 

Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Get it Now for Free!