Guest guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Thank you, RoseAnne. When I asked the question about where Qi comes from, it disappeared without a trace! I asked for a couple of reasons: first, state the obvious and make sure people are not assuming they know. Are we born with Qi? Do we supplement Qi? If we're born with it, where does that come from? Secondly, there are theories that we 'share' Qi. Julian Scott, peadiatric acupuncturist from Britain, talks about children getting Qi from there parents (thereby confirming my long-held belief that the little darlings drained my energy around 3 in the afternoon, because their's always seemed to rise in direct proportion to mine falling). What I believe he says is that the Qi of very young children is undeveloped, or immature, and they will access the Qi of their parents to sustain them. I've also noticed one of the benefits of community style acupuncture is a weaving of the Qi of group members - which supplements the treatment for the individuals. So, do we share Qi with others? Do people develop Qi deficiency because they are in situations where they are bolstering someone else's Qi? I've lots more questions along this line, but I'd really like to know where folks think Qi comes from. If my speculations are valid, that changes the treatment picture some... Karen Karen R Adams, Lic Ac, Dipl Ac 296 Avenue A Turners Falls, MA 01376 413.863.0088 RoseAnne Spradlin <ra6151 2008/03/18 Tue AM 10:33:13 CDT Chinese Medicine Re: Re: Agree or Disagree? Since I am a relatively new practitioner, I usually don't chime in on these kinds of discussions. But in your summary of people's responses to the question about treating Qi deficiency, I do feel something is being missed. That is, our bodies are not closed systems. I think we can receive 'Heavenly Qi' or 'Earth's Qi' through the skillful needling of a practitioner who is him/herself in touch with this Qi. At least I think I have experienced this as a patient. --RoseAnne On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Hugo Ramiro wrote: > Hi all, thank you everybody for your comments, it's been an > interesting conversation. > So far it seems that most agree that Qi cannot come from the > acupuncture itself and needs to be present somewhere in the body. > There also seems to be a general concensus that acupuncture can > treat qi deficiency via channel balancing. It was also pointed out > that a primary qi deficiency is very different from a secondary qi > deficiency, i.e. a " qi deficiency " caused by blood stagnation. > There are also interesting points about what exactly " deficient " > means, as well as the fact that many acupuncture points are > specifically listed as treating one type of deficiency or another. > A final issue of qi as intentionality or as physical modality was > mentioned. > > So my question now becomes: > How many of you are willing to treat your patient population with > acupuncture only? If you are not willing, what is it that herbs (to > put a fine point on the matter) bring to the table that acupuncture > does not? > > Aha, let's see what all you smarty-pants come up with this time! > > Hugo > > > ________ > Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with For Good > > http://uk.promotions./forgood/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Thank you, RoseAnne, and Karen, for keep trying!! I haven't chimed in partly because of time, partly because the issue with practicing Qi was discussed long time ago in this forum but lead to somewhat unpleasant departure of some members, if my memory serves. Assuming we stick to Qi practice for the purpose of application and adminstration through acupuncture I will jump in. For the original survey, my response would be disagree. Several of my friends and myself explicitly " transmit Qi " or " allow Qi to flow " to patient and experiencing patient's Xie Qi (usually cold Qi) heading our direction through the our fingers. Most patients can exerience " receiving " Qi and get " energized " often on ST36, for example, or experience warmth on R4, for example. This is done without thrusting or turning the needles and without the " intention " to move Qi among different channels or different points of the same channel. Where does Qi come from? To my understanding, Qi is in between substance(yin) and function(yang); it's the intermediate state between substance and function. It can be transmitted. Where do the practitioners who transmit Qi to patients get their Qi from? They get it either from their own body's Qi (transformed from substance) or from external objects, or, eventually, the universal soure of Qi. Mike L. kradams1 wrote: Thank you, RoseAnne. When I asked the question about where Qi comes from, it disappeared without a trace! I asked for a couple of reasons: first, state the obvious and make sure people are not assuming they know. Are we born with Qi? Do we supplement Qi? If we're born with it, where does that come from? Secondly, there are theories that we 'share' Qi. Julian Scott, peadiatric acupuncturist from Britain, talks about children getting Qi from there parents (thereby confirming my long-held belief that the little darlings drained my energy around 3 in the afternoon, because their's always seemed to rise in direct proportion to mine falling). What I believe he says is that the Qi of very young children is undeveloped, or immature, and they will access the Qi of their parents to sustain them. I've also noticed one of the benefits of community style acupuncture is a weaving of the Qi of group members - which supplements the treatment for the individuals. So, do we share Qi with others? Do people develop Qi deficiency because they are in situations where they are bolstering someone else's Qi? I've lots more questions along this line, but I'd really like to know where folks think Qi comes from. If my speculations are valid, that changes the treatment picture some... Karen Karen R Adams, Lic Ac, Dipl Ac 296 Avenue A Turners Falls, MA 01376 413.863.0088 RoseAnne Spradlin <ra6151 2008/03/18 Tue AM 10:33:13 CDT Chinese Medicine Re: Re: Agree or Disagree? Since I am a relatively new practitioner, I usually don't chime in on these kinds of discussions. But in your summary of people's responses to the question about treating Qi deficiency, I do feel something is being missed. That is, our bodies are not closed systems. I think we can receive 'Heavenly Qi' or 'Earth's Qi' through the skillful needling of a practitioner who is him/herself in touch with this Qi. At least I think I have experienced this as a patient. --RoseAnne On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Hugo Ramiro wrote: > Hi all, thank you everybody for your comments, it's been an > interesting conversation. > So far it seems that most agree that Qi cannot come from the > acupuncture itself and needs to be present somewhere in the body. > There also seems to be a general concensus that acupuncture can > treat qi deficiency via channel balancing. It was also pointed out > that a primary qi deficiency is very different from a secondary qi > deficiency, i.e. a " qi deficiency " caused by blood stagnation. > There are also interesting points about what exactly " deficient " > means, as well as the fact that many acupuncture points are > specifically listed as treating one type of deficiency or another. > A final issue of qi as intentionality or as physical modality was > mentioned. > > So my question now becomes: > How many of you are willing to treat your patient population with > acupuncture only? If you are not willing, what is it that herbs (to > put a fine point on the matter) bring to the table that acupuncture > does not? > > Aha, let's see what all you smarty-pants come up with this time! > > Hugo > > > ________ > Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with For Good > > http://uk.promotions./forgood/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.