Guest guest Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 Hi All, Andrea & Greg, Andrea wrote: > " Prophylactically, I took a wide-spectrum lactobacillus capsule that > is enterically-coated, with each dose of antibiotics. " Greg replied: > I have recently been wondering about this. Is it a good idea to take > probiotics when taking an antibiotic? Wouldn't the antibiotic be, at > least in part, " spent " on killing the probiotic bacteria, thus > reducing the amount of antibiotic remaining to attack the bacteria > it's meant to be attacking? Anyone have any idea about this? SS Biradar, ST Bahagvati, Baburao Shegunshi: Probiotics And Antibiotics: A Brief Overview. The Internet Journal of Nutrition and Wellness. 2005. Volume 2 Number 1. says:... Antibiotics are a double edged sword. Their power of fighting infection is indiscriminate towards all bacteria. All bacteria succumb to their powers, no mercy is shown towards beneficial strains. One should avoid the use of antibiotics unless it becomes life threatening. The human immune system has developed many ways to survive an infection and should be trusted, nourished, and given time. Our species would not have survived if our immune system was not the best defense we have against deleterious infections. If the use of antibiotics becomes absolutely necessary, proceed with caution. The longer the duration of antibiotic treatment, the more likely a candida albican infection can occur. Also, the use of probiotics during and immediately after antibiotic treatment will help minimize the destructive effects of antibiotics to the beneficial flora. ... During antibiotic therapy, taking probiotics as well keeps the intestinal flora in proper balance. They can be taken together, but not at the same time of day. In order for the probiotics to be the most effective, they should be taken at least two hours after each dose of antibiotic. When the treatment has been completed, double or triple the probiotic supplements for about 10-14 days. Probiotics should be taken with food or shortly after eating as food dilutes the stomach acids enough for them to survive their trip through to the intestines where they belong. See the full-text at: http://tinyurl.com/2ot2b5 However, the jury is still out on the wisdom of co-administration of pro- with anti- biotics because http://tinyurl.com/2vjl6q says: BC Johnston, AL Supina, M Ospina, S Vohra. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea [Review]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 Issue 4. 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub2 This version first published online: 18 April 2007 in Issue 2, 2007. Date of Most Recent Substantive Amendment: 24 January 2007 This record should be cited as: Johnston BC, Supina AL, Ospina M, Vohra S. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004827. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub2. Background: Antibiotics alter the microbial balance within the gastrointestinal tract. Probiotics may prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) via restoration of the gut microflora. Antibiotics are prescribed frequently in children and AAD is common in this population. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of probiotics (any specified strain or dose) for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. To assess adverse events associated with the use of probiotics when co-administered with antibiotics in children. Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL , AMED, and the Web of Science (inception to August 2006) were searched along with specialized registers including the Cochrane IBD/FBD Review Group, CISCOM, Chalmers PedCAM Research Register and trial registries from inception to 2005. Letters were sent to authors of included trials, nutra/pharmaceutical companies, and experts in the field requesting additional information on ongoing or unpublished trials. Conference proceedings, dissertation abstracts, and reference lists from included and relevant articles were hand searched. Selection criteria: Randomized, parallel, controlled (placebo, active, or no treatment) trials comparing co-administered probiotics with antibiotics for the prevention of diarrhea secondary to antibiotic use in children (0 to 18 years). Data collection and analysis: Methodological quality assessment and data extraction were conducted independently by two authors (BCJ, AS). Dichotomous data (incidence of diarrhea, adverse events) were combined using pooled relative risks, and continuous data (mean duration of diarrhea, mean daily stool frequency) as weighted mean differences, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Adverse events were summarized using risk difference. For overall pooled results on the incidence of diarrhea, a priori sensitivity analyses included per protocol versus intention to treat, random versus fixed effects, and methodological quality criterion. Subgroup analysis were conducted on probiotic strain, dose, definition of antibiotic- associated diarrhea, and antibiotic agent. Main results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Trials included treatment with either Lactobacilli spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., or Saccharomyces boulardii alone or in combination. Six studies used a single strain probiotic agent and four combined two probiotic strains. The per protocol analysis for 9/10 trials reporting on the incidence of diarrhea show statistically significant results favouring probiotics over active/non active controls (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.74). However, intention to treat analysis showed non-significant results overall (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.63). Five of ten trials monitored for adverse events (n = 647); none reported a serious adverse event. Authors' conclusions: Probiotics show promise for the prevention of pediatric AAD. While per protocol analysis yields treatment effect estimates that are both statistically and clinically significant, as does analysis of high quality studies, the estimate from the intention to treat analysis was not statistically significant. Future studies should involve probiotic strains and doses with the most promising evidence (e.g., Lactobacillus GG, Lactobacillus sporogenes, Saccharomyces boulardii at 5 to 40 billion colony forming units/day). Research done to date does not permit determination of the effect of age (e.g., infant versus older children) or antibiotic duration (e.g., 5 days versus 10 days). Future trials would benefit from a validated primary outcome measure for antibiotic-associated diarrhea that is sensitive to change and reflects what treatment effect clinicians, parents, and children consider important. The current data are promising, but it is premature to routinely recommend probiotics for the prevention of pediatric AAD. Plain language summary: It is premature to routinely recommend probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) Studies of probiotics for the prevention of pediatric AAD: Ten studies were reviewed and provide the best evidence we have. Study quality was mostly good overall. The studies tested 1986 children (aged 0 to 18 years) who were receiving probiotics co-administered with antibiotics to prevent AAD. The subjects received probiotics (Lactobacilli spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., or Saccharomyces boulardii alone or in combination), placebo (fake pills), other treatments thought to prevent AAD (i.e. diosmectite or infant formula) or no treatment. The studies were short term and ranged in length from 15 days to 3 months. What is AAD and could probiotics work to prevent AAD? AAD occurs when antibiotics disturb the natural balance of " good " and " bad " bacteria in the intestinal tract causing harmful bacteria to sometimes multiply beyond their normal numbers. The symptoms of AAD may include frequent watery bowel movements and crampy abdominal pain. Probiotics are dietary supplements containing potentially beneficial bacteria or yeast. Probiotics are thought to restore the natural balance of bacteria in the intestinal tract. What did the studies show? An analysis that included only patients who completed the studies showed that probiotics may be effective for preventing AAD. However, a more conservative analysis that counted study drop-outs as treatment failures did not show any differences between probiotic and comparison groups. How safe are probiotics? Probiotics were generally well tolerated and side effects occurred infrequently. What is the bottom line? Although current data are promising, there is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend the use of probiotics for the prevention of pediatric AAD. Best regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2007 Report Share Posted October 31, 2007 Thanks to everyone who replied to this thread. Recently a friend of mine has sent me some information on this subject that matches what others have said here, so it seems as if the majority are in favor of this routine. Now for one other question. Dr Tice, I believe, said it's best to take the probiotics with food, which seems to make sense to me, yet I've read elsewhere that they should be taken on an empty stomach. Can anyone speak to this seemingly important point? Thanks! Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.