Is Ron Paul in Danger?

[Guest guest]

PAUL

IN CROSSHAIRS OF ELITE

Renowned bestselling author,

journalist Says Ron Paul’s life may be in danger

 

By Pat Shannan

Bilderberg

tracker Daniel Estulin says he has received information from sources

inside the U.S. intelligence community suggesting that people from the

highest levels of government are discussing “eliminating” Rep. Ron Paul

because its controlled political system is threatened by Paul’s

exploding popularity.

 

Estulin, whose information has proven

accurate in the past, went public with the bombshell story Dec. 14 on

Alex Jones’s national radio show.

 

“I am getting information from

my sources that there are people involved from a higher level of the

American establishment who are seriously considering

assassination,”Estulin said.

 

Estulin’s past predictions about

global events were accurate because of the solid information provided

to him from within the Bilderberg organization. Over 18 months ago

Estulin correctly made the call that the Iran invasion had been delayed

and was probably off the table, which appears now to be the case

following the release of the National Intelligence Estimate showing

that Iran had terminated its nuclear research in 2003.

 

Estulin,

an award-winning investigative journalist, said that he was given the

information from a source that has been reliable for over a decade in

providing accurate projections of future events based on what the elite

were discussing in their own circles and that assassination was a

serious option should the Ron Paul Revolution continue to grow.

 

Retired

FBI Special-Agent-in-Charge Ted Gunderson, 78, has been a whistleblower

since his retirement nearly 30 years ago. He said “Yes, absolutely,

they won’t hesitate to do it.”

 

Rather than shooting Paul, a more

sophisticated silent attack such as poisoning or the provocation of a

heart attack via exotic electronic technology would be more likely, he

said.

 

“That way the real killers are not required to put a

‘patsy’ in place, such as in the Kennedy assassination,” he continued.

“And don’t count out a plane crash or a car wreck, which has been

another method of choice in recent years.”

 

Paul himself has

stated on previous occasions that he is aware of the dangers of being

such a bold spokesman for freedom and understands what threat he

represents to those who would stoop to anything to preserve their grip

on America.

 

Paul acknowledged months before the Estulin report

that such a threat is “real,” agreeing with a number of historical

examples where leaders were killed or attacked for successfully

standing up to the system.

 

“That’s right. They’ll do it,” Paul

said, making reference to previous men of history such as Andrew

Jackson, Huey Long, Bobby Kennedy and GeorgeWallace. The attack on

Jackson, on the Capitol steps in 1835, was the only one of the four not

to be a successful “removal” because his attacker’s weapon misfired.

Both Long and Kennedy died and Wallace spent the rest of his life in a

wheelchair.

 

Estulin, author of the global bestseller Club Bilderberg: The True

Story of the Bilderberg Group,

described the concept as a “trial balloon from the inner core within

the inner core—it hasn’t gone beyond that but it is obviously on the

table because I think that they are very much concerned.”

 

Estulin

said his sources were from within the intelligence community and they

were telling him that “the people of the highest levels of

government—not related in any way, at least visibly, to George W.

Bush—the first initial conversation of what might happen if we were to

do this, has taken place.”

 

“The Ron Paul phenomenon has

galvanized an entire nation,” said Estulin, adding that both the people

who discovered the plot and its potential protagonists are terrified at

the consequences of what such an action might be because of the

difficulty in judging just how severely the general public will react.

 

Estulin

said that the conspirators, which he described as a “small circle of

intimates,” were discussing what the effect would be if Paul was

“removed” —they are being very careful to use the word “remove” rather

than more volatile terms. But Estulin was told directly that “remove”

was a euphemism for assassinate.

 

James P. Tucker Jr., who has

covered Bilderberg for more than 30 years for AFP, said he has been

collaborating with Estulin for years. “We always pool the information

we get out of Bilderberg, and Danny’s never been wrong,” he said.

 

Meanwhile Paul’s campaign raised more than $6 million on the

anniversary of the Boston Tea Party.

 

See more from reporter Pat Shannan at www.patshannan.com.

(Issue #53, December 31, 2007)