Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global Population Reduction Policy

[Guest guest]

There are links all through this article - to access them go the webpage.

 

Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global Population Reduction Policy

_http://www.infowars.com/canadian-newspaper-calls-for-malthusian-global-popu

lation-reduction-policy/_

(http://www.infowars.com/canadian-newspaper-calls-for-malthusian-global-populati\

on-reduction-policy/)

Kurt Nimmo

 

 

Diane Francis, writing for Canada’s Financial Post, begins an editorial by

declaring a myth — the world is over-populated. “The ‘inconvenient

truth’

overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is

warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world,†she

writes.

“A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to

reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million

births every four days.â€

 

 

An interesting choice of words. Planetary law. In other words, a world

government with the power to decide if humans are allowed to procreate.

 

 

Currently we do not have such a world government. Behind the scenes at

Copenhagen, however, the powerbrokers are working feverishly to establish the

sort of world government only partially imagined by Ms. Francis.

 

 

The elite realized a big victory when they anointed the Bilderberg and

Trilateral commission member Herman Van Rompuy as the “permanent†(and

unelected) president of the European Union. Van Rompuy declared 2009 the

“first

year of global governance†and said Copenhagen is “another step towards the

global management of our planet.â€

 

 

It is also interesting that Francis cited China’s notorious one-child

policy as the desired template. The totalitarian rulers of China have enforced

a one-child policy since 1979. It is modern eugenics in practice. “China

currently has Galton-era eugenics laws on the books which only allow

pre-approved couples to marry and have children,†writes Daniel Taylor. “The

Law

of the People’s Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care states

that if the approved couples children are deemed to be inferior they are to

be terminated.â€

 

 

China’s draconian eugenics program is supported the Rockefellers, a clan

of infamous eugenicists. The Washington Post reported on October 12, 2000

that the Rockefeller Foundation had donated two million dollars to upgrade a

Chinese drug factory that produces the abortion drug RU-486. “RU-486 has

been a key ingredient in China’s population control strategy for years. Of

the estimated 10 million abortions performed annually in China, about half

are carried out with RU-486, said Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai

Institute of Planned Parenthood Research,†the CIA’s favorite newspaper

reported.

 

 

The globalist United Nations — soon to be cast off as useless (it was

revealed this week in Copenhagen) — is largely responsible for fostering

China’

s one-child policy.

 

 

China’s brutal totalitarian rulers base their Malthusian depopulation

program on Mao Zedong’s reading of Marxist theory on population growth, an

idea Marx took from Thomas Malthus. The British economist argued in favor of

“

positive checks†on population. Positive checks are those, according to

Thomas Malthus, that increase the death rate, specifically disease, war,

disaster, and finally, when other checks are ineffective, famine. Of course,

when Malthus formulated his macabre philosophy in 1798, the modern

totalitarian dictatorship had yet to come into existence.

 

 

Mao was a master at eliminating humans he deemed either inferior or

belonging to the wrong social class. Mao, like Stalin, killed more people than

Hitler. Unlike the mass murder campaign in the Soviet Union that began years

after the October Revolution, Mao started killing people almost immediately

after taking power. He starved millions to death under a forced

agricultural collectivization program. Mao considered these collectivized farms

too

individualistic, so he forced millions of peasants into communes where

family life, traditions, personal property and privacy, personal initiative and

individual freedom were drummed out of the victims.

 

 

The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia would later attempt to follow Mao’s lead and

killed more than 20% of the population under the rule of Pol Pot.

 

 

Mao’s so-called Great Leap Forward in industrialization killed at least 30

million Chinese, mostly through famine. A few years later, Mao launched

his Cultural Revolution and purged and executed large numbers of Communist

Party members and intellectuals. The Cultural Revolution killed an additional

10-15 million.

 

 

China’s so-called communist rulers continued Mao’s brutal policies after

his death. In 1989 the government engaged in the methodical murder of an

estimated 2,000-3,000 demonstrators in Tiananmen Square. Others have put the

number at over 12,000. However, the murderous zeal of Mao has waned in

China. Political criminals are no longer killed in large numbers. Instead,

political criminals are sent to “re-education†camps and exploited as

state-owned assets (an undetermined number of these state assets are harvested

for

their internal organs).

 

 

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded

not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also

in fostering high morale and community of purpose,†a praiseful David

Rockefeller has gushed (New York Times, August 10, 1973). “The social

experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most

important and

successful in human history.â€

 

 

Rockefeller and the New World Order gang are chomping at the bit to bring

Mao’s lessons to Europe and especially America where “high morale and

community of purpose†need to be inflicted on a population that still

remembers, however vaguely, the example of Jefferson and Madison.

 

 

Part of the plan is to drastically scale back the population through

eugenics. The “recalibration†of humanity Diane Francis writes about so

glowingly in her editorial published by the Financial Times on December 8 is

well

underway in the form of genetically modified food, a systematic poisoning

of the population through water and product fluoridation, and degradation of

the environment through industrial and military pollution (which the Ford

and Rockefeller foundation environmentalists ignore in favor of the

contrived scam they call “climate change,†formerly global warming before

it was

revealed as a scientifically disprovable fallacy).

 

 

The New World Order will ultimately have no use for Ms. Francis or the

rest of us, who are considered interlopers and trespassers on a planet they

consider their property.